Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Job Creation w/o Added Debt, Taxes or Inflation
- This topic has 95 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by
cr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 1, 2008 at 12:27 PM #310746December 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM #310685
Eugene
Participant[quote]Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending. [/quote]
The Government managed to put a man on the moon for less money (in inflation-adjusted dollars) than competent and efficient Goldman Sachs lost in market capitalization in the last 12 months.
Government-managed health insurance system (Medicare) has the lowest administrative overhead of all insurance companies in the United States.
Raising taxes is not the answer. Spending less is not the answer, either. To minimize the effects of this recession, we need more government spending and lower taxes at the same time.
December 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM #310751Participant[quote]Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending. [/quote]
The Government managed to put a man on the moon for less money (in inflation-adjusted dollars) than competent and efficient Goldman Sachs lost in market capitalization in the last 12 months.
Government-managed health insurance system (Medicare) has the lowest administrative overhead of all insurance companies in the United States.
Raising taxes is not the answer. Spending less is not the answer, either. To minimize the effects of this recession, we need more government spending and lower taxes at the same time.
December 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM #310668Participant[quote]Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending. [/quote]
The Government managed to put a man on the moon for less money (in inflation-adjusted dollars) than competent and efficient Goldman Sachs lost in market capitalization in the last 12 months.
Government-managed health insurance system (Medicare) has the lowest administrative overhead of all insurance companies in the United States.
Raising taxes is not the answer. Spending less is not the answer, either. To minimize the effects of this recession, we need more government spending and lower taxes at the same time.
December 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM #310642Participant[quote]Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending. [/quote]
The Government managed to put a man on the moon for less money (in inflation-adjusted dollars) than competent and efficient Goldman Sachs lost in market capitalization in the last 12 months.
Government-managed health insurance system (Medicare) has the lowest administrative overhead of all insurance companies in the United States.
Raising taxes is not the answer. Spending less is not the answer, either. To minimize the effects of this recession, we need more government spending and lower taxes at the same time.
December 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM #310279Participant[quote]Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending. [/quote]
The Government managed to put a man on the moon for less money (in inflation-adjusted dollars) than competent and efficient Goldman Sachs lost in market capitalization in the last 12 months.
Government-managed health insurance system (Medicare) has the lowest administrative overhead of all insurance companies in the United States.
Raising taxes is not the answer. Spending less is not the answer, either. To minimize the effects of this recession, we need more government spending and lower taxes at the same time.
December 1, 2008 at 1:02 PM #310673UCGal
Participant[quote=cooprider][quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.
[/quote]
Businesses can be extremely competant and run very efficiently – but if they are in a marketplace that doesn’t have demand for what they are providing… They’ll still fail.I’m not disagreeing with the inefficiencies of large companies… I work for a behometh that boggles my mind, on a daily basis, with their inept, stupid decision making. Larger isn’t better. I’m just saying that being small, well run, efficient is not enough if it’s a business that provides a product or service that does not have corresponding demand.
December 1, 2008 at 1:02 PM #310647Participant[quote=cooprider][quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.
[/quote]
Businesses can be extremely competant and run very efficiently – but if they are in a marketplace that doesn’t have demand for what they are providing… They’ll still fail.I’m not disagreeing with the inefficiencies of large companies… I work for a behometh that boggles my mind, on a daily basis, with their inept, stupid decision making. Larger isn’t better. I’m just saying that being small, well run, efficient is not enough if it’s a business that provides a product or service that does not have corresponding demand.
December 1, 2008 at 1:02 PM #310690Participant[quote=cooprider][quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.
[/quote]
Businesses can be extremely competant and run very efficiently – but if they are in a marketplace that doesn’t have demand for what they are providing… They’ll still fail.I’m not disagreeing with the inefficiencies of large companies… I work for a behometh that boggles my mind, on a daily basis, with their inept, stupid decision making. Larger isn’t better. I’m just saying that being small, well run, efficient is not enough if it’s a business that provides a product or service that does not have corresponding demand.
December 1, 2008 at 1:02 PM #310284Participant[quote=cooprider][quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.
[/quote]
Businesses can be extremely competant and run very efficiently – but if they are in a marketplace that doesn’t have demand for what they are providing… They’ll still fail.I’m not disagreeing with the inefficiencies of large companies… I work for a behometh that boggles my mind, on a daily basis, with their inept, stupid decision making. Larger isn’t better. I’m just saying that being small, well run, efficient is not enough if it’s a business that provides a product or service that does not have corresponding demand.
December 1, 2008 at 1:02 PM #310756Participant[quote=cooprider][quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.
[/quote]
Businesses can be extremely competant and run very efficiently – but if they are in a marketplace that doesn’t have demand for what they are providing… They’ll still fail.I’m not disagreeing with the inefficiencies of large companies… I work for a behometh that boggles my mind, on a daily basis, with their inept, stupid decision making. Larger isn’t better. I’m just saying that being small, well run, efficient is not enough if it’s a business that provides a product or service that does not have corresponding demand.
December 1, 2008 at 6:23 PM #310850Carl Veritas
ParticipantThe answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.
December 1, 2008 at 6:23 PM #310831ParticipantThe answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.
December 1, 2008 at 6:23 PM #310917ParticipantThe answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.
December 1, 2008 at 6:23 PM #310807ParticipantThe answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.