Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Jeremy Grantham’s 1Q09 Letter: Fantastic as usual
- This topic has 200 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 12, 2009 at 10:48 PM #398360May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #397691
scaredyclassic
Participantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #397938scaredyclassic
Participantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #398162scaredyclassic
Participantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #398221scaredyclassic
Participantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #398365scaredyclassic
Participantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #397701scaredyclassic
Participantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #397948scaredyclassic
Participantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #398172scaredyclassic
Participantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #398231scaredyclassic
Participantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #398375scaredyclassic
Participantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #397715scaredyclassic
Participantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #397963scaredyclassic
Participantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #398187scaredyclassic
Participantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #398246scaredyclassic
Participantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
