Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Jeremy Grantham’s 1Q09 Letter: Fantastic as usual
- This topic has 200 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 12, 2009 at 10:48 PM #398360May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #397691scaredyclassicParticipant
social security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #397938scaredyclassicParticipantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #398162scaredyclassicParticipantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #398221scaredyclassicParticipantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM #398365scaredyclassicParticipantsocial security’s bust. the usa may lose its triple AAA rating. we’re broke. we’re rpinting dollars like no tomorrow. consumers are debt choked.
i feel money is less risky sitting in gold miners stock than in the bank, practically…esp. if dollar cost averaged as aprt of regular savings…
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #397701scaredyclassicParticipantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #397948scaredyclassicParticipantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #398172scaredyclassicParticipantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #398231scaredyclassicParticipantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 10:57 PM #398375scaredyclassicParticipantallan wrote: You’re buying into the notion that gold (or silver) will have intrinsic value if the paper currency collapses. Well, I have news for you. Prior to 1971, the paper currency’s value was tied to existing gold reserves. Do you think that prior to 1971 there were no boom and bust cycles? Or inflationary and deflationary cycles?.Yours are specious arguments and not supported by fact or history.
gold will have value if the paper currency collapses. and yeah, there were cycles, and all kinds of frauds and panics, but gold always came through. there is never a time in any financial history where people went broke holding on to gold.
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #397715scaredyclassicParticipantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #397963scaredyclassicParticipantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #398187scaredyclassicParticipantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
May 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM #398246scaredyclassicParticipantwhere is the next bubble gonna be?
green technology. naah.
no guarantees, but i wouldnt fall over and have a heart attack if it were gold. im not talking my book. i’d be a little bit surprised. but not shocked. 500 or 5000 an oz, either way, times are so crazy, i think it’s a decent bet. i think the chance of catching the next bubble in gold is a hell of a lot giher than plugging along in the us stock market
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.