Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › It’s when you buy…
- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by
no_such_reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2011 at 5:39 AM #657880January 25, 2011 at 7:45 AM #658671
UCGal
ParticipantHow dare they factor in inflation, taxes, etc… That’s not how we’re supposed to look at things if you listen to Wall Street.
Thanks for the chart.
January 25, 2011 at 7:45 AM #657930ParticipantHow dare they factor in inflation, taxes, etc… That’s not how we’re supposed to look at things if you listen to Wall Street.
Thanks for the chart.
January 25, 2011 at 7:45 AM #657868ParticipantHow dare they factor in inflation, taxes, etc… That’s not how we’re supposed to look at things if you listen to Wall Street.
Thanks for the chart.
January 25, 2011 at 7:45 AM #658999ParticipantHow dare they factor in inflation, taxes, etc… That’s not how we’re supposed to look at things if you listen to Wall Street.
Thanks for the chart.
January 25, 2011 at 7:45 AM #658532ParticipantHow dare they factor in inflation, taxes, etc… That’s not how we’re supposed to look at things if you listen to Wall Street.
Thanks for the chart.
January 25, 2011 at 8:05 AM #658686Anonymous
GuestThe chart is interesting.
The interpretation is misguided:
But historical averages can vary widely depending on their starting and ending points.
In other words, you can prove anything with statistics if you pick and choose your data. Not exactly a revelation.
The interesting conclusion is that there is enough volatility that the “long term” is at least 20+ years.
So there really is not any such thing as “dependable” long-term returns, at least for one person’s working lifetime.
But all investment outcomes are relative. What are the alternatives?
January 25, 2011 at 8:05 AM #658547GuestThe chart is interesting.
The interpretation is misguided:
But historical averages can vary widely depending on their starting and ending points.
In other words, you can prove anything with statistics if you pick and choose your data. Not exactly a revelation.
The interesting conclusion is that there is enough volatility that the “long term” is at least 20+ years.
So there really is not any such thing as “dependable” long-term returns, at least for one person’s working lifetime.
But all investment outcomes are relative. What are the alternatives?
January 25, 2011 at 8:05 AM #659014GuestThe chart is interesting.
The interpretation is misguided:
But historical averages can vary widely depending on their starting and ending points.
In other words, you can prove anything with statistics if you pick and choose your data. Not exactly a revelation.
The interesting conclusion is that there is enough volatility that the “long term” is at least 20+ years.
So there really is not any such thing as “dependable” long-term returns, at least for one person’s working lifetime.
But all investment outcomes are relative. What are the alternatives?
January 25, 2011 at 8:05 AM #657883GuestThe chart is interesting.
The interpretation is misguided:
But historical averages can vary widely depending on their starting and ending points.
In other words, you can prove anything with statistics if you pick and choose your data. Not exactly a revelation.
The interesting conclusion is that there is enough volatility that the “long term” is at least 20+ years.
So there really is not any such thing as “dependable” long-term returns, at least for one person’s working lifetime.
But all investment outcomes are relative. What are the alternatives?
January 25, 2011 at 8:05 AM #657945GuestThe chart is interesting.
The interpretation is misguided:
But historical averages can vary widely depending on their starting and ending points.
In other words, you can prove anything with statistics if you pick and choose your data. Not exactly a revelation.
The interesting conclusion is that there is enough volatility that the “long term” is at least 20+ years.
So there really is not any such thing as “dependable” long-term returns, at least for one person’s working lifetime.
But all investment outcomes are relative. What are the alternatives?
January 25, 2011 at 8:14 AM #658557sdduuuude
ParticipantIt is a cool chart, but nobody really invests all their money in one year, then brings it all out in another year.
Long-term appreciation averages are more meaningful when people invest a little each year, then take it out bit by bit for retirement.
This chart suggests that you can lower risks by dollar-cost average when entering and diversifying in investments that are not all correlated to the market.
January 25, 2011 at 8:14 AM #657893ParticipantIt is a cool chart, but nobody really invests all their money in one year, then brings it all out in another year.
Long-term appreciation averages are more meaningful when people invest a little each year, then take it out bit by bit for retirement.
This chart suggests that you can lower risks by dollar-cost average when entering and diversifying in investments that are not all correlated to the market.
January 25, 2011 at 8:14 AM #657955ParticipantIt is a cool chart, but nobody really invests all their money in one year, then brings it all out in another year.
Long-term appreciation averages are more meaningful when people invest a little each year, then take it out bit by bit for retirement.
This chart suggests that you can lower risks by dollar-cost average when entering and diversifying in investments that are not all correlated to the market.
January 25, 2011 at 8:14 AM #659024ParticipantIt is a cool chart, but nobody really invests all their money in one year, then brings it all out in another year.
Long-term appreciation averages are more meaningful when people invest a little each year, then take it out bit by bit for retirement.
This chart suggests that you can lower risks by dollar-cost average when entering and diversifying in investments that are not all correlated to the market.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.