- This topic has 210 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
jetonejet.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 27, 2008 at 5:57 PM #294172October 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM #293923
temeculaguy
Participantjet, I never said there are no jobs in this valley, I said that more of the commuters travel South vs North, there was no mention that all temeculans are commuters. I should just ignore your comment/insult because in reality it benefits me to perpetuate the sterotype you cast because i don’t want the competition. Personally there are about 4 school districts in S.D. county I would put my kids in, the rest is crap. I am also from there and but you could pay me to move back, exactly 350k is what it would take, because the neighborhood, schools and people that 300k would buy me here, would cost me 650k at least there. How big was your house in 1999 when you paid 150k? I paid 200k in 1998 for 2400 sq in Redhawk and my income was half what it is today doing the same job so 300k for 3200 sq ft doesn’t seem too far from 1999 prices. I checked i can buy my old house for about 250k. Plus S. Temec is pretty much built out, the building is to the north of temec and the farther north the less desirable but why am i responding, how did I get suckered into the “I wouldn’t live there for free” bullshit for the umpteenth time, you stay in your world and leave me alone in mine.
But this was never the question in the first place, i was asked my opinion and gave it, I think that the majority of the price declines in this valley have happened already as opposed to s.d. which is still overpriced. I have gone head to head with a number of people in an attempt to buy both my primary and rentals and they aren’t dirt people, they aren’t unemployed and they arent even 20% downers, most are coming in with a far larger warchest than I, which is why I am still here, because they will pay more than i think certain houses are worth. Because I want to pay 2009 prices now, more and more it looks like I will have to wait for 2009 prices in 2009, but I can argue the specific fundamentals as to why paying 2009 (same as 2001) prices makes sense and why certain rent multiplier fundamentals make sense in my hood while buying in sd right now does not make sense, you want to have that argument, point out specific errors or flaws in the data, dont make “dirt people” comments, you want to take on TG, ask around, i’ve been here a while, can’t remember ever losing, maybe my time has come and you will be one to knock me off the boards, or maybe you’ll reveal where you live and I’ll make generalizations about the community you love.
It’s probably the wine, maybe you didn’t mean to pick a fight, I should switch back to zoloft before someone gets hurt.
I know what it is that has me on edge, once again it is Norv Turner, blame him, not me, I’m just a victim.
October 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM #294255Participantjet, I never said there are no jobs in this valley, I said that more of the commuters travel South vs North, there was no mention that all temeculans are commuters. I should just ignore your comment/insult because in reality it benefits me to perpetuate the sterotype you cast because i don’t want the competition. Personally there are about 4 school districts in S.D. county I would put my kids in, the rest is crap. I am also from there and but you could pay me to move back, exactly 350k is what it would take, because the neighborhood, schools and people that 300k would buy me here, would cost me 650k at least there. How big was your house in 1999 when you paid 150k? I paid 200k in 1998 for 2400 sq in Redhawk and my income was half what it is today doing the same job so 300k for 3200 sq ft doesn’t seem too far from 1999 prices. I checked i can buy my old house for about 250k. Plus S. Temec is pretty much built out, the building is to the north of temec and the farther north the less desirable but why am i responding, how did I get suckered into the “I wouldn’t live there for free” bullshit for the umpteenth time, you stay in your world and leave me alone in mine.
But this was never the question in the first place, i was asked my opinion and gave it, I think that the majority of the price declines in this valley have happened already as opposed to s.d. which is still overpriced. I have gone head to head with a number of people in an attempt to buy both my primary and rentals and they aren’t dirt people, they aren’t unemployed and they arent even 20% downers, most are coming in with a far larger warchest than I, which is why I am still here, because they will pay more than i think certain houses are worth. Because I want to pay 2009 prices now, more and more it looks like I will have to wait for 2009 prices in 2009, but I can argue the specific fundamentals as to why paying 2009 (same as 2001) prices makes sense and why certain rent multiplier fundamentals make sense in my hood while buying in sd right now does not make sense, you want to have that argument, point out specific errors or flaws in the data, dont make “dirt people” comments, you want to take on TG, ask around, i’ve been here a while, can’t remember ever losing, maybe my time has come and you will be one to knock me off the boards, or maybe you’ll reveal where you live and I’ll make generalizations about the community you love.
It’s probably the wine, maybe you didn’t mean to pick a fight, I should switch back to zoloft before someone gets hurt.
I know what it is that has me on edge, once again it is Norv Turner, blame him, not me, I’m just a victim.
October 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM #294278Participantjet, I never said there are no jobs in this valley, I said that more of the commuters travel South vs North, there was no mention that all temeculans are commuters. I should just ignore your comment/insult because in reality it benefits me to perpetuate the sterotype you cast because i don’t want the competition. Personally there are about 4 school districts in S.D. county I would put my kids in, the rest is crap. I am also from there and but you could pay me to move back, exactly 350k is what it would take, because the neighborhood, schools and people that 300k would buy me here, would cost me 650k at least there. How big was your house in 1999 when you paid 150k? I paid 200k in 1998 for 2400 sq in Redhawk and my income was half what it is today doing the same job so 300k for 3200 sq ft doesn’t seem too far from 1999 prices. I checked i can buy my old house for about 250k. Plus S. Temec is pretty much built out, the building is to the north of temec and the farther north the less desirable but why am i responding, how did I get suckered into the “I wouldn’t live there for free” bullshit for the umpteenth time, you stay in your world and leave me alone in mine.
But this was never the question in the first place, i was asked my opinion and gave it, I think that the majority of the price declines in this valley have happened already as opposed to s.d. which is still overpriced. I have gone head to head with a number of people in an attempt to buy both my primary and rentals and they aren’t dirt people, they aren’t unemployed and they arent even 20% downers, most are coming in with a far larger warchest than I, which is why I am still here, because they will pay more than i think certain houses are worth. Because I want to pay 2009 prices now, more and more it looks like I will have to wait for 2009 prices in 2009, but I can argue the specific fundamentals as to why paying 2009 (same as 2001) prices makes sense and why certain rent multiplier fundamentals make sense in my hood while buying in sd right now does not make sense, you want to have that argument, point out specific errors or flaws in the data, dont make “dirt people” comments, you want to take on TG, ask around, i’ve been here a while, can’t remember ever losing, maybe my time has come and you will be one to knock me off the boards, or maybe you’ll reveal where you live and I’ll make generalizations about the community you love.
It’s probably the wine, maybe you didn’t mean to pick a fight, I should switch back to zoloft before someone gets hurt.
I know what it is that has me on edge, once again it is Norv Turner, blame him, not me, I’m just a victim.
October 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM #294291Participantjet, I never said there are no jobs in this valley, I said that more of the commuters travel South vs North, there was no mention that all temeculans are commuters. I should just ignore your comment/insult because in reality it benefits me to perpetuate the sterotype you cast because i don’t want the competition. Personally there are about 4 school districts in S.D. county I would put my kids in, the rest is crap. I am also from there and but you could pay me to move back, exactly 350k is what it would take, because the neighborhood, schools and people that 300k would buy me here, would cost me 650k at least there. How big was your house in 1999 when you paid 150k? I paid 200k in 1998 for 2400 sq in Redhawk and my income was half what it is today doing the same job so 300k for 3200 sq ft doesn’t seem too far from 1999 prices. I checked i can buy my old house for about 250k. Plus S. Temec is pretty much built out, the building is to the north of temec and the farther north the less desirable but why am i responding, how did I get suckered into the “I wouldn’t live there for free” bullshit for the umpteenth time, you stay in your world and leave me alone in mine.
But this was never the question in the first place, i was asked my opinion and gave it, I think that the majority of the price declines in this valley have happened already as opposed to s.d. which is still overpriced. I have gone head to head with a number of people in an attempt to buy both my primary and rentals and they aren’t dirt people, they aren’t unemployed and they arent even 20% downers, most are coming in with a far larger warchest than I, which is why I am still here, because they will pay more than i think certain houses are worth. Because I want to pay 2009 prices now, more and more it looks like I will have to wait for 2009 prices in 2009, but I can argue the specific fundamentals as to why paying 2009 (same as 2001) prices makes sense and why certain rent multiplier fundamentals make sense in my hood while buying in sd right now does not make sense, you want to have that argument, point out specific errors or flaws in the data, dont make “dirt people” comments, you want to take on TG, ask around, i’ve been here a while, can’t remember ever losing, maybe my time has come and you will be one to knock me off the boards, or maybe you’ll reveal where you live and I’ll make generalizations about the community you love.
It’s probably the wine, maybe you didn’t mean to pick a fight, I should switch back to zoloft before someone gets hurt.
I know what it is that has me on edge, once again it is Norv Turner, blame him, not me, I’m just a victim.
October 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM #294327Participantjet, I never said there are no jobs in this valley, I said that more of the commuters travel South vs North, there was no mention that all temeculans are commuters. I should just ignore your comment/insult because in reality it benefits me to perpetuate the sterotype you cast because i don’t want the competition. Personally there are about 4 school districts in S.D. county I would put my kids in, the rest is crap. I am also from there and but you could pay me to move back, exactly 350k is what it would take, because the neighborhood, schools and people that 300k would buy me here, would cost me 650k at least there. How big was your house in 1999 when you paid 150k? I paid 200k in 1998 for 2400 sq in Redhawk and my income was half what it is today doing the same job so 300k for 3200 sq ft doesn’t seem too far from 1999 prices. I checked i can buy my old house for about 250k. Plus S. Temec is pretty much built out, the building is to the north of temec and the farther north the less desirable but why am i responding, how did I get suckered into the “I wouldn’t live there for free” bullshit for the umpteenth time, you stay in your world and leave me alone in mine.
But this was never the question in the first place, i was asked my opinion and gave it, I think that the majority of the price declines in this valley have happened already as opposed to s.d. which is still overpriced. I have gone head to head with a number of people in an attempt to buy both my primary and rentals and they aren’t dirt people, they aren’t unemployed and they arent even 20% downers, most are coming in with a far larger warchest than I, which is why I am still here, because they will pay more than i think certain houses are worth. Because I want to pay 2009 prices now, more and more it looks like I will have to wait for 2009 prices in 2009, but I can argue the specific fundamentals as to why paying 2009 (same as 2001) prices makes sense and why certain rent multiplier fundamentals make sense in my hood while buying in sd right now does not make sense, you want to have that argument, point out specific errors or flaws in the data, dont make “dirt people” comments, you want to take on TG, ask around, i’ve been here a while, can’t remember ever losing, maybe my time has come and you will be one to knock me off the boards, or maybe you’ll reveal where you live and I’ll make generalizations about the community you love.
It’s probably the wine, maybe you didn’t mean to pick a fight, I should switch back to zoloft before someone gets hurt.
I know what it is that has me on edge, once again it is Norv Turner, blame him, not me, I’m just a victim.
October 27, 2008 at 10:37 PM #293943jficquette
ParticipantFind some articles on the internet that are discussing expected future declines in home prices here in SoCal. Find he worst ones you can and let her read them.
John
October 27, 2008 at 10:37 PM #294275ParticipantFind some articles on the internet that are discussing expected future declines in home prices here in SoCal. Find he worst ones you can and let her read them.
John
October 27, 2008 at 10:37 PM #294298ParticipantFind some articles on the internet that are discussing expected future declines in home prices here in SoCal. Find he worst ones you can and let her read them.
John
October 27, 2008 at 10:37 PM #294311ParticipantFind some articles on the internet that are discussing expected future declines in home prices here in SoCal. Find he worst ones you can and let her read them.
John
October 27, 2008 at 10:37 PM #294347ParticipantFind some articles on the internet that are discussing expected future declines in home prices here in SoCal. Find he worst ones you can and let her read them.
John
October 27, 2008 at 10:55 PM #293953SD Realtor
ParticipantJust remember TG, you need to have a good defense (or maybe even an average defense) to win right?
October 27, 2008 at 10:55 PM #294285ParticipantJust remember TG, you need to have a good defense (or maybe even an average defense) to win right?
October 27, 2008 at 10:55 PM #294308ParticipantJust remember TG, you need to have a good defense (or maybe even an average defense) to win right?
October 27, 2008 at 10:55 PM #294321ParticipantJust remember TG, you need to have a good defense (or maybe even an average defense) to win right?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.