Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Investing in bonds – Question for investing gurus
- This topic has 75 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 17, 2010 at 1:23 PM #605958September 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM #606722enron_by_the_seaParticipant
[1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)
September 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM #606060enron_by_the_seaParticipant[1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)
September 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM #605973enron_by_the_seaParticipant[1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)
September 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM #607040enron_by_the_seaParticipant[1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)
September 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM #606615enron_by_the_seaParticipant[1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)
September 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #609710equalizerParticipantFor the short term (5 years) I would look at alternative investments for at least 25% of your portfolio, esp higher yield and emerging. Not lowest cost, but better risk management. Here’s a list starting with the least volatile:
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Inc Inv
ATOIXHussman Strategic Total Return
HSTRXJanus Flexible Bond T
JAFIXDoubleLine Total Return Bond N
DLTNXPIMCO Unconstrained Bond D PUBDX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Income N
DLENXPermanent Portfolio (lots of gold, silver)
PRPFXMatthews Asia Dividend
MAPIXHarbor High-Yield Bond Inv
HYFIXFor longer term I would suggest variable annuity, but the benefits and guarantees by the Prudential’s and MetLife’s of the world have been greatly reduced since 2008.
From Financial Planning (Sep 2010), “VA’s Head for a Slowdown” – “Strong compensation and the continuation of guarantees, albeit somewhat more expensive and restrictive, are clearly appealing to the independent advisor.”
Damn, I just don’t know when to keep my mouth shut, that’s why I don’t have a Ferrari like the Grammy winning poster who was screaming about the value of VA’s earlier this year.
September 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #610688equalizerParticipantFor the short term (5 years) I would look at alternative investments for at least 25% of your portfolio, esp higher yield and emerging. Not lowest cost, but better risk management. Here’s a list starting with the least volatile:
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Inc Inv
ATOIXHussman Strategic Total Return
HSTRXJanus Flexible Bond T
JAFIXDoubleLine Total Return Bond N
DLTNXPIMCO Unconstrained Bond D PUBDX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Income N
DLENXPermanent Portfolio (lots of gold, silver)
PRPFXMatthews Asia Dividend
MAPIXHarbor High-Yield Bond Inv
HYFIXFor longer term I would suggest variable annuity, but the benefits and guarantees by the Prudential’s and MetLife’s of the world have been greatly reduced since 2008.
From Financial Planning (Sep 2010), “VA’s Head for a Slowdown” – “Strong compensation and the continuation of guarantees, albeit somewhat more expensive and restrictive, are clearly appealing to the independent advisor.”
Damn, I just don’t know when to keep my mouth shut, that’s why I don’t have a Ferrari like the Grammy winning poster who was screaming about the value of VA’s earlier this year.
September 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #610371equalizerParticipantFor the short term (5 years) I would look at alternative investments for at least 25% of your portfolio, esp higher yield and emerging. Not lowest cost, but better risk management. Here’s a list starting with the least volatile:
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Inc Inv
ATOIXHussman Strategic Total Return
HSTRXJanus Flexible Bond T
JAFIXDoubleLine Total Return Bond N
DLTNXPIMCO Unconstrained Bond D PUBDX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Income N
DLENXPermanent Portfolio (lots of gold, silver)
PRPFXMatthews Asia Dividend
MAPIXHarbor High-Yield Bond Inv
HYFIXFor longer term I would suggest variable annuity, but the benefits and guarantees by the Prudential’s and MetLife’s of the world have been greatly reduced since 2008.
From Financial Planning (Sep 2010), “VA’s Head for a Slowdown” – “Strong compensation and the continuation of guarantees, albeit somewhat more expensive and restrictive, are clearly appealing to the independent advisor.”
Damn, I just don’t know when to keep my mouth shut, that’s why I don’t have a Ferrari like the Grammy winning poster who was screaming about the value of VA’s earlier this year.
September 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #610263equalizerParticipantFor the short term (5 years) I would look at alternative investments for at least 25% of your portfolio, esp higher yield and emerging. Not lowest cost, but better risk management. Here’s a list starting with the least volatile:
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Inc Inv
ATOIXHussman Strategic Total Return
HSTRXJanus Flexible Bond T
JAFIXDoubleLine Total Return Bond N
DLTNXPIMCO Unconstrained Bond D PUBDX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Income N
DLENXPermanent Portfolio (lots of gold, silver)
PRPFXMatthews Asia Dividend
MAPIXHarbor High-Yield Bond Inv
HYFIXFor longer term I would suggest variable annuity, but the benefits and guarantees by the Prudential’s and MetLife’s of the world have been greatly reduced since 2008.
From Financial Planning (Sep 2010), “VA’s Head for a Slowdown” – “Strong compensation and the continuation of guarantees, albeit somewhat more expensive and restrictive, are clearly appealing to the independent advisor.”
Damn, I just don’t know when to keep my mouth shut, that’s why I don’t have a Ferrari like the Grammy winning poster who was screaming about the value of VA’s earlier this year.
September 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #609623equalizerParticipantFor the short term (5 years) I would look at alternative investments for at least 25% of your portfolio, esp higher yield and emerging. Not lowest cost, but better risk management. Here’s a list starting with the least volatile:
Alpine Ultra Short Tax Optimized Inc Inv
ATOIXHussman Strategic Total Return
HSTRXJanus Flexible Bond T
JAFIXDoubleLine Total Return Bond N
DLTNXPIMCO Unconstrained Bond D PUBDX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Income N
DLENXPermanent Portfolio (lots of gold, silver)
PRPFXMatthews Asia Dividend
MAPIXHarbor High-Yield Bond Inv
HYFIXFor longer term I would suggest variable annuity, but the benefits and guarantees by the Prudential’s and MetLife’s of the world have been greatly reduced since 2008.
From Financial Planning (Sep 2010), “VA’s Head for a Slowdown” – “Strong compensation and the continuation of guarantees, albeit somewhat more expensive and restrictive, are clearly appealing to the independent advisor.”
Damn, I just don’t know when to keep my mouth shut, that’s why I don’t have a Ferrari like the Grammy winning poster who was screaming about the value of VA’s earlier this year.
September 27, 2010 at 11:45 AM #609836patbParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea][1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)[/quote]
look at utility preferred shares also.
fixed dividend, decent biz model
look at SCE or CMS
September 27, 2010 at 11:45 AM #609749patbParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea][1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)[/quote]
look at utility preferred shares also.
fixed dividend, decent biz model
look at SCE or CMS
September 27, 2010 at 11:45 AM #610384patbParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea][1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)[/quote]
look at utility preferred shares also.
fixed dividend, decent biz model
look at SCE or CMS
September 27, 2010 at 11:45 AM #610496patbParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea][1] for your situation, there are only 3 catagories of bonds that you should consider – Treasury, GNMA and CA GO. Or spread money in these 3 catagories. [If you don’t know about them google or wikipedia them.] Default risk in everything else is too high.
[2] Do not expect miracles in investing in above catagories. I would expect returns of 3% or less going forward.
[3] Do not buy individual bonds (transaction costs may be too high and less diversification.) Consider low cost bond funds from Vanguard for example. I do not recommend bond ETFs because most of them do not have sufficient trading volume so that their price can diverge from NAV by a lot during periods of market stress (e.g. flash crash)
[4] You CAN lose money by investing in bonds – either because of default or because interest rates rise. You have reduced default probability by staying with above catagories. You can estimate the sensitivity of bond fund to interest rates changes by looking at its “duration”. For example, If “duration” is 5 years then 1% rise in rates translates into 5% loss of principal. Intermediate bond funds will typically have duration of 3-7 years.
[3] If you can not take risk of losing 5-10% ( to earn a return of ~3% per year) do not invest in bonds. ( Or you can buy gold & gun – someone is bound to suggest this sooner or later π ….)[/quote]
look at utility preferred shares also.
fixed dividend, decent biz model
look at SCE or CMS
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.