- This topic has 150 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2010 at 9:59 PM #16944January 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM #505261EugeneParticipant
Cool!
January 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM #505407EugeneParticipantCool!
January 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM #505814EugeneParticipantCool!
January 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM #505906EugeneParticipantCool!
January 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM #506160EugeneParticipantCool!
January 24, 2010 at 10:38 PM #505271urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=Eugene]Cool![/quote]
And I totally had that coming.January 24, 2010 at 10:38 PM #505417urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=Eugene]Cool![/quote]
And I totally had that coming.January 24, 2010 at 10:38 PM #505824urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=Eugene]Cool![/quote]
And I totally had that coming.January 24, 2010 at 10:38 PM #505916urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=Eugene]Cool![/quote]
And I totally had that coming.January 24, 2010 at 10:38 PM #506170urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=Eugene]Cool![/quote]
And I totally had that coming.January 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM #505281EugeneParticipantInteresting.
A lot of that is really the change in sales structure from lower-priced to relatively higher-priced houses, at the lower end, and to lower-priced houses at the high end. (Surely nobody thinks that 92029 really did appreciate 37% in the last year!)
My own house price index calculations show strong growth near Camp Pendleton (92054, 92057, 92084 all up 6%+ YoY), Hillcrest/North Park and areas further east such as City Heights are doing well. Three biggest losers are 92009, 91914, 92037, and even those suffered most of their losses in Q4 ’08 to Q1 ’09 (91914 is down less than 2% since Q1 ’09).
January 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM #505427EugeneParticipantInteresting.
A lot of that is really the change in sales structure from lower-priced to relatively higher-priced houses, at the lower end, and to lower-priced houses at the high end. (Surely nobody thinks that 92029 really did appreciate 37% in the last year!)
My own house price index calculations show strong growth near Camp Pendleton (92054, 92057, 92084 all up 6%+ YoY), Hillcrest/North Park and areas further east such as City Heights are doing well. Three biggest losers are 92009, 91914, 92037, and even those suffered most of their losses in Q4 ’08 to Q1 ’09 (91914 is down less than 2% since Q1 ’09).
January 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM #505834EugeneParticipantInteresting.
A lot of that is really the change in sales structure from lower-priced to relatively higher-priced houses, at the lower end, and to lower-priced houses at the high end. (Surely nobody thinks that 92029 really did appreciate 37% in the last year!)
My own house price index calculations show strong growth near Camp Pendleton (92054, 92057, 92084 all up 6%+ YoY), Hillcrest/North Park and areas further east such as City Heights are doing well. Three biggest losers are 92009, 91914, 92037, and even those suffered most of their losses in Q4 ’08 to Q1 ’09 (91914 is down less than 2% since Q1 ’09).
January 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM #505926EugeneParticipantInteresting.
A lot of that is really the change in sales structure from lower-priced to relatively higher-priced houses, at the lower end, and to lower-priced houses at the high end. (Surely nobody thinks that 92029 really did appreciate 37% in the last year!)
My own house price index calculations show strong growth near Camp Pendleton (92054, 92057, 92084 all up 6%+ YoY), Hillcrest/North Park and areas further east such as City Heights are doing well. Three biggest losers are 92009, 91914, 92037, and even those suffered most of their losses in Q4 ’08 to Q1 ’09 (91914 is down less than 2% since Q1 ’09).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.