Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › interest rates in the USA v other advanced economies
- This topic has 126 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 2 months ago by JPJones.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 28, 2019 at 3:35 PM #813397September 1, 2019 at 3:56 PM #813406gzzParticipant
London is overpriced, the rest is stagnant economy and falling population.
UK stocks may be better, but they were mostly overpriced compared to French companies when I last compared.
September 4, 2019 at 4:34 PM #813430gzzParticipantAverage mortgage rates below 3.5% (3.46%) for the first time in 3+ years.
http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/consumer_rates/920655.aspx
Plenty of room to fall further: delinquencies and foreclosures at 10+ year lows.
September 4, 2019 at 7:44 PM #813431spdrunParticipantIf rates fall further, it will likely be because of a recession. People without jerbs can’t pay their mortgages…
September 13, 2019 at 9:02 AM #813531gzzParticipantRates bounced up from multiyear lows by about .3% in the USA and other big economies. Turns out buying Swiss bonds that yield -1.1% wasn’t a great idea, who would have thought? They went down the most to -0.6.
September 13, 2019 at 9:05 AM #813532gzzParticipantThe rate swings over tariffs that amount to less than $100 billion a year combined on both sides is irrational.
The way to take advantage is if there’s another breakdown in talks and round of tariffs, buy the dip in stocks and sell the bond rally.
September 15, 2019 at 10:25 PM #813570FlyerInHiGuestNegative rates coming to USA?
The idiots who predicted hyperinflation from the 2009 stimulus were so wrong. What’s worse is that their obstruction retarded the economy and caused us all loss of wealth. Of course, no apologies.
September 23, 2019 at 12:44 AM #813648FlyerInHiGuestThe next step is fiscal support to work in conjunction with monetary policy.
Where are the people who predicted hyperinflation? Ron Paul, anyone? I think it was Ross Perot before that. So wrong.
September 28, 2019 at 1:28 PM #813686phasterParticipantthe fed pumped a bunch more money in to keep the Repo rate down,… not too long ago it (the overnight lending for banks) spiked to 10%
consider that the US national debt goes up ONLY about a trillion a year,… seems the FED dumped in about an 1/8 of that amount OR about 142 billion (plus whatever they put in on the QT,…) to keep this key rate down
just wondering if anyone else has been paying attention to stuff like this,… (and considering the bigger picture)
[quote]
The Fed’s fix of the crucial repo lending market for banks will be put to the test on MondayThe Federal Reserve has used open market operations to soothe the short-term funding market, and now its temporary fix faces a test as the third quarter ends.
The Fed has used overnight and 14-day market operations to stabilize the repo market, used by financial institutions to fund themselves on a short term basis. The Fed was reacting to a sudden spike in rates Sept. 16 and 17, and it is under pressure to permanently resolve the issue, which seems to stem from a cash crunch in the overnight borrowing market, rather than a credit crisis.
During the temporary panic in the overnight funds market, rates spiked to as high as 10%, and the Fed’s own benchmark federal funds rate briefly traded at 2.30%, 0.05 above the Fed’s target range on Sept. 17. The weighted average Treasury repo rate in the Fed’s operation was at a subdued 1.80% Friday. In the past several days, the Fed expanded its facilities, as they met high demand, but by Friday, both its $100 billion overnight repo and its $60 billion 14-day were undersubscribed.
September 28, 2019 at 1:32 PM #813687outtamojoParticipantI keep seeing this on the news too- beyond me to know if this turns out to be a missed sign or nothing at all.
September 29, 2019 at 11:19 AM #813688phasterParticipant99.99% sure its not a missed sign or nothing at all
not too many are aware that,..
[quote]
Eurodollars are time deposits denominated in U.S. dollars at banks outside the United States, and thus are not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve. Consequently, such deposits are subject to much less regulation than similar deposits within the U.S. The term was originally coined for U.S. dollars in European banks, but it expanded over the years to its present definition.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurodollar
[/quote]it is assumed that the fed controls the money supply, BUT this only applies w/ in the USA,… so WHAT IF shadow banks outside of the USA w/ little or no regulation, initiated loans,… in other words created their own supply of “digital” Eurodollars?!
it would be akin to the left hand not knowing what the right hand of the same financial institution is doing,… if you think this isn’t possible then consider the story of various divisions of Deutsche Bank loaning money to POTUS
http://www.npr.org/2019/05/22/725893104/episode-914-trump-and-deutsche-a-long-affair
considering the bigger picture of an over all increase of the money supply due to unregulated Eurodollars over the years,… since money seeks its best return I don’t think it is too hard to imagine that off shore money eventually finds its way into the RE as well as stock market (which would bid up prices)
I’m just a basic science knucklehead that has never taken a formal economics or finance class,… but all my math background tells me at some point the figures on the balance sheet,… don’t balance
AND the only reason it seems there has not been a problem thus far is because the dollar is the international medium-of-exchange/store-of-value/unit-of-account
http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/1011/how-the-triffin-dilemma-affects-currencies.aspx
October 4, 2019 at 5:10 PM #813712gzzParticipantBest of both worlds: unemployment drops to new low (lowest since 1969) and rates are back down to 1.51%. Latest Y over Y wage growth was a solid 2.9%
October 5, 2019 at 8:41 AM #813713phasterParticipant[quote=gzz]Best of both worlds[/quote]
calm before the storm???
had an invite the other day to hear what one of the NY fed officials had to say,…
John Williams
President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Vice Chairman, FOMC (@ucsd)FWIW at the table I sat at,… sensed there was not such a warm and fuzzy feeling given recent news and the discussion of the inverted yield curve and unexpected spike of the Repo rate
looking at the bigger picture there is the ever growing unsustainable off balance sheet debt which is fractal in nature,… meaning debt obligations are happening at the local level
http://www.TinyURL.com/13thcheck
as well as at the state AND national levels
http://www.TinyURL.com/InvestorWarning
so while the nation is being distracted w/ various political POTUS shenanigans,… there is a storm brewing on the horizon that few are paying attention to
[quote]
PBGC Projections: Multiemployer Program Insolvent in FY 2025
May 31, 2018WASHINGTON – The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s Multiemployer Insurance Program continues to face insolvency by the end of fiscal year 2025, according to findings in the FY 2017 Projections Report. The agency’s insurance program for multiemployer pension plans covers over 10 million people.
The new projections show a narrower range of years for the likely date of insolvency of the Multiemployer Program. The likelihood that the Multiemployer Program will run out of money before the end of FY 2025 has grown to over 90 percent, and there remains a significant chance the program will run out of money during FY 2024. The likelihood the program will remain solvent after FY 2026 is now less than 1 percent.
October 5, 2019 at 7:04 PM #813714gzzParticipantPhaster the PBGC is not economically significant. It pays reduced pensions to old industrials whose defined benefit pension plans went bust. It will likely be bailed out if it becomes insolvent, but it won’t be that much money.
While not a good thing if a bunch of 85 year old widows of steelworkers see their pension cut another 15%, it just won’t have any larger effect.
Arguably it wouldn’t even be unfair. A lot of these plans agreed to benefits when inflation was high, and it was expected by everyone that inflation would reduce the obligations more than actually happened. So some of these old pensions would, as a worst case, just be reduced to the expected real value.
October 6, 2019 at 12:13 PM #813716phasterParticipant[quote=gzz]Phaster the PBGC is not economically significant. It pays reduced pensions to old industrials whose defined benefit pension plans went bust. It will likely be bailed out if it becomes insolvent, but it won’t be that much money.[/quote]
unto itself the failure of PBGC might not be economically significant,… BUT what I am pondering is something akin to the expression “death by a thousand cuts”
IOW let’s first consider a failure of PBGC,… 10 million workers who bitch to politicians they are screwed, are going to demand taxpayers make them whole
now let’s look at the city of SD,…
http://www.TinyURL.com/13thcheck
here we have another issue which it is assumed local taxpayers are the financial backstop (i.e. the california rule),… AND these two potential failures are only first order taxpayer burden effects,… what of all the various negative feed backs if/when the economic house of cards falls???
speaking of a potential house of cards
[quote]
Repo glitches expose flaws in Fed’s approachCentral bank might have acted more quickly if the repo market were its primary target
Overnight repo rates — the interest rate paid to borrow cash in exchange for Treasuries for just 24 hours — began rising on Monday, September 16. But it was not until after 9am the next day that the New York Fed, which is responsible for implementing the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, stepped in to try to ease the strain.
According to John Williams, president of the New York Fed, the announcement was timed to coincide with the release of data showing a rise in the effective federal funds rate. That makes the mandate for intervention clear.
…But the Fed’s sortie into the repo market — since repeated several times — has stirred conversations about whether policymakers are focused on the right short-term rate. Fed funds was once the driving force of cash markets. Now it is a back-seat passenger and repo is at the wheel.
…fed funds is hardly representative of the dynamics affecting short-term lending markets. As was seen in September, its basic function — to track the Fed’s target rate — has broken down, because it is now susceptible to movements in other rates such as repo rather than driving them.
…Since the Fed has started reversing QE, reserves have fallen and some — but not all — players have consequently run short of cash again. Such shortages are threatening the ability of the Fed to maintain control of the effective fed funds rate
http://www.ft.com/content/d2cd761a-e64d-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc
[/quote]in related news,…
[quote]
Fed to Keep Pumping Liquidity Into Repo Market Through October
By Alex HarrisOctober 4, 2019, 11:02 AM PDT Updated on October 4, 2019, 11:37 AM PDT
…The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said Friday that it will conduct operations for overnight repurchase agreements through Nov. 4, having previously only scheduled them through Oct. 10. The central bank also announced eight new term offerings to provide additional funding through this month.
…These measures are officially aimed at keeping the fed funds rate within the central bank’s target range. While those measures did bring the market more in line with this, there was a brief move upward in repo rates at the end of September as participants fulfilled quarter-end funding needs.
just saying w/ all the various issues not being directly addressed or well understood by those at the controls, I think we’re going to see a yuge example of murphy’s law in action
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.