Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Inflation – Has it arrived?
- This topic has 1,050 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 29, 2010 at 7:01 AM #611488September 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM #610484kev374Participant
unless wages go up how can there be inflation? Sure, commodities can go up because there is some fixed demand (people have to buy food, pay for gas, heating etc.) but any inflation in commodities will be at the expense of other asset classes I think.
Wages are definitely not going up but are dropping. If people don’t have more money I don’t see how there can be inflation regardless of how much Uncle Ben prints.
September 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM #610572kev374Participantunless wages go up how can there be inflation? Sure, commodities can go up because there is some fixed demand (people have to buy food, pay for gas, heating etc.) but any inflation in commodities will be at the expense of other asset classes I think.
Wages are definitely not going up but are dropping. If people don’t have more money I don’t see how there can be inflation regardless of how much Uncle Ben prints.
September 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM #611117kev374Participantunless wages go up how can there be inflation? Sure, commodities can go up because there is some fixed demand (people have to buy food, pay for gas, heating etc.) but any inflation in commodities will be at the expense of other asset classes I think.
Wages are definitely not going up but are dropping. If people don’t have more money I don’t see how there can be inflation regardless of how much Uncle Ben prints.
September 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM #611229kev374Participantunless wages go up how can there be inflation? Sure, commodities can go up because there is some fixed demand (people have to buy food, pay for gas, heating etc.) but any inflation in commodities will be at the expense of other asset classes I think.
Wages are definitely not going up but are dropping. If people don’t have more money I don’t see how there can be inflation regardless of how much Uncle Ben prints.
September 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM #611543kev374Participantunless wages go up how can there be inflation? Sure, commodities can go up because there is some fixed demand (people have to buy food, pay for gas, heating etc.) but any inflation in commodities will be at the expense of other asset classes I think.
Wages are definitely not going up but are dropping. If people don’t have more money I don’t see how there can be inflation regardless of how much Uncle Ben prints.
September 29, 2010 at 10:16 AM #610489AKParticipantMaybe we’re not seeing classic “inflation” in the same sense that the recession is officially “over” … but yeah I don’t see prices as uniformly stable or dropping across the board either.
Copper and nickel prices are way up again, presumably due to speculation and Chinese stockpiling. Same with food prices — down from ridiculous heights of the 2008 grain bubble, but definitely going up again.
September 29, 2010 at 10:16 AM #610577AKParticipantMaybe we’re not seeing classic “inflation” in the same sense that the recession is officially “over” … but yeah I don’t see prices as uniformly stable or dropping across the board either.
Copper and nickel prices are way up again, presumably due to speculation and Chinese stockpiling. Same with food prices — down from ridiculous heights of the 2008 grain bubble, but definitely going up again.
September 29, 2010 at 10:16 AM #611122AKParticipantMaybe we’re not seeing classic “inflation” in the same sense that the recession is officially “over” … but yeah I don’t see prices as uniformly stable or dropping across the board either.
Copper and nickel prices are way up again, presumably due to speculation and Chinese stockpiling. Same with food prices — down from ridiculous heights of the 2008 grain bubble, but definitely going up again.
September 29, 2010 at 10:16 AM #611234AKParticipantMaybe we’re not seeing classic “inflation” in the same sense that the recession is officially “over” … but yeah I don’t see prices as uniformly stable or dropping across the board either.
Copper and nickel prices are way up again, presumably due to speculation and Chinese stockpiling. Same with food prices — down from ridiculous heights of the 2008 grain bubble, but definitely going up again.
September 29, 2010 at 10:16 AM #611548AKParticipantMaybe we’re not seeing classic “inflation” in the same sense that the recession is officially “over” … but yeah I don’t see prices as uniformly stable or dropping across the board either.
Copper and nickel prices are way up again, presumably due to speculation and Chinese stockpiling. Same with food prices — down from ridiculous heights of the 2008 grain bubble, but definitely going up again.
September 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM #610529urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=ocrenter]there is no doubt that the government is planning and hoping for inflation.
the citizens would prefer it over additional collapse in their home value.
inflation is preferred over deflation.
but the most important thing:
inflation makes the debt less burdensome. and globally we are still in the position to inflate our way out of certain doom.[/quote]
I think you are right that at a micro foundational level, democratic republics are inclined to inflate.
If enough people want it, then their interests will get expressed.
However, the issue here is bit more complex.
Specifically, inflation is generally driven primarily from increased nominal effective demand.
That demand is composed of 2 primary components.
Those are desire (wanting the thing) and capacity (the ability to afford it).
Desire is influenced by capacity because, of course, having money does tend to dictate a certain new interests (money no object, wouldn’t you want a corvette as a commuter car?).The trick is the capacity.
We don’t (so far as I know) have a truly good metric for capacity.
It used to be that M1 or M2 gave a pretty good indicator.
However, with the advent of innovative consumer leverage (mostly since 1980), I don’t think those measures really work so well.
I think that credit cards, auto loans, mortgage standards, and unsecured lending have a pretty huge effect.
The effective demand for that debt, in turn, has also dropped dramatically.
This is mostly due to higher lending standards and generally decreased sentimental tendency.
That sentiment issue is driven because there is a perceived lack of safety in those lending products.
HELOCS and card shutoffs as well as a general fear of bankruptcy (probably a good fear to have) are the bases of that perception.In other words, demand is down due to general capacity drop and the demand for increase capacity is down and showing no signs of real change.
Dumping money into banks (thus raising monetary base) can’t really change aggregate demand by itself. If we see inflation, it will be one of 2 distinct animals:
1: as part of the cost-push (reference by CAR above) with commodity and exchange prices pushing us into greater brokeness
or
2: as part of an intentional effort to reduce effective debt burdensHonestly, I think that the second strategy is more likely in Eurozone. There they have the unenviable role of issuing and managing debt without owning their own printing presses.
I would not be surprised to see the ECB lose relevance over this.
Yes this puts me at odds with many people here.
Flame on if you like.
My 2 bits.
September 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM #610617urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=ocrenter]there is no doubt that the government is planning and hoping for inflation.
the citizens would prefer it over additional collapse in their home value.
inflation is preferred over deflation.
but the most important thing:
inflation makes the debt less burdensome. and globally we are still in the position to inflate our way out of certain doom.[/quote]
I think you are right that at a micro foundational level, democratic republics are inclined to inflate.
If enough people want it, then their interests will get expressed.
However, the issue here is bit more complex.
Specifically, inflation is generally driven primarily from increased nominal effective demand.
That demand is composed of 2 primary components.
Those are desire (wanting the thing) and capacity (the ability to afford it).
Desire is influenced by capacity because, of course, having money does tend to dictate a certain new interests (money no object, wouldn’t you want a corvette as a commuter car?).The trick is the capacity.
We don’t (so far as I know) have a truly good metric for capacity.
It used to be that M1 or M2 gave a pretty good indicator.
However, with the advent of innovative consumer leverage (mostly since 1980), I don’t think those measures really work so well.
I think that credit cards, auto loans, mortgage standards, and unsecured lending have a pretty huge effect.
The effective demand for that debt, in turn, has also dropped dramatically.
This is mostly due to higher lending standards and generally decreased sentimental tendency.
That sentiment issue is driven because there is a perceived lack of safety in those lending products.
HELOCS and card shutoffs as well as a general fear of bankruptcy (probably a good fear to have) are the bases of that perception.In other words, demand is down due to general capacity drop and the demand for increase capacity is down and showing no signs of real change.
Dumping money into banks (thus raising monetary base) can’t really change aggregate demand by itself. If we see inflation, it will be one of 2 distinct animals:
1: as part of the cost-push (reference by CAR above) with commodity and exchange prices pushing us into greater brokeness
or
2: as part of an intentional effort to reduce effective debt burdensHonestly, I think that the second strategy is more likely in Eurozone. There they have the unenviable role of issuing and managing debt without owning their own printing presses.
I would not be surprised to see the ECB lose relevance over this.
Yes this puts me at odds with many people here.
Flame on if you like.
My 2 bits.
September 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM #611162urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=ocrenter]there is no doubt that the government is planning and hoping for inflation.
the citizens would prefer it over additional collapse in their home value.
inflation is preferred over deflation.
but the most important thing:
inflation makes the debt less burdensome. and globally we are still in the position to inflate our way out of certain doom.[/quote]
I think you are right that at a micro foundational level, democratic republics are inclined to inflate.
If enough people want it, then their interests will get expressed.
However, the issue here is bit more complex.
Specifically, inflation is generally driven primarily from increased nominal effective demand.
That demand is composed of 2 primary components.
Those are desire (wanting the thing) and capacity (the ability to afford it).
Desire is influenced by capacity because, of course, having money does tend to dictate a certain new interests (money no object, wouldn’t you want a corvette as a commuter car?).The trick is the capacity.
We don’t (so far as I know) have a truly good metric for capacity.
It used to be that M1 or M2 gave a pretty good indicator.
However, with the advent of innovative consumer leverage (mostly since 1980), I don’t think those measures really work so well.
I think that credit cards, auto loans, mortgage standards, and unsecured lending have a pretty huge effect.
The effective demand for that debt, in turn, has also dropped dramatically.
This is mostly due to higher lending standards and generally decreased sentimental tendency.
That sentiment issue is driven because there is a perceived lack of safety in those lending products.
HELOCS and card shutoffs as well as a general fear of bankruptcy (probably a good fear to have) are the bases of that perception.In other words, demand is down due to general capacity drop and the demand for increase capacity is down and showing no signs of real change.
Dumping money into banks (thus raising monetary base) can’t really change aggregate demand by itself. If we see inflation, it will be one of 2 distinct animals:
1: as part of the cost-push (reference by CAR above) with commodity and exchange prices pushing us into greater brokeness
or
2: as part of an intentional effort to reduce effective debt burdensHonestly, I think that the second strategy is more likely in Eurozone. There they have the unenviable role of issuing and managing debt without owning their own printing presses.
I would not be surprised to see the ECB lose relevance over this.
Yes this puts me at odds with many people here.
Flame on if you like.
My 2 bits.
September 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM #611273urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=ocrenter]there is no doubt that the government is planning and hoping for inflation.
the citizens would prefer it over additional collapse in their home value.
inflation is preferred over deflation.
but the most important thing:
inflation makes the debt less burdensome. and globally we are still in the position to inflate our way out of certain doom.[/quote]
I think you are right that at a micro foundational level, democratic republics are inclined to inflate.
If enough people want it, then their interests will get expressed.
However, the issue here is bit more complex.
Specifically, inflation is generally driven primarily from increased nominal effective demand.
That demand is composed of 2 primary components.
Those are desire (wanting the thing) and capacity (the ability to afford it).
Desire is influenced by capacity because, of course, having money does tend to dictate a certain new interests (money no object, wouldn’t you want a corvette as a commuter car?).The trick is the capacity.
We don’t (so far as I know) have a truly good metric for capacity.
It used to be that M1 or M2 gave a pretty good indicator.
However, with the advent of innovative consumer leverage (mostly since 1980), I don’t think those measures really work so well.
I think that credit cards, auto loans, mortgage standards, and unsecured lending have a pretty huge effect.
The effective demand for that debt, in turn, has also dropped dramatically.
This is mostly due to higher lending standards and generally decreased sentimental tendency.
That sentiment issue is driven because there is a perceived lack of safety in those lending products.
HELOCS and card shutoffs as well as a general fear of bankruptcy (probably a good fear to have) are the bases of that perception.In other words, demand is down due to general capacity drop and the demand for increase capacity is down and showing no signs of real change.
Dumping money into banks (thus raising monetary base) can’t really change aggregate demand by itself. If we see inflation, it will be one of 2 distinct animals:
1: as part of the cost-push (reference by CAR above) with commodity and exchange prices pushing us into greater brokeness
or
2: as part of an intentional effort to reduce effective debt burdensHonestly, I think that the second strategy is more likely in Eurozone. There they have the unenviable role of issuing and managing debt without owning their own printing presses.
I would not be surprised to see the ECB lose relevance over this.
Yes this puts me at odds with many people here.
Flame on if you like.
My 2 bits.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.