- This topic has 40 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by chrisp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 14, 2010 at 9:17 AM #17341April 14, 2010 at 1:51 PM #539027treehuggerParticipant
I don’t see the problem? I am going to get the full amount.
I don’t make huge money, but I just looked at my paystub from a few weeks ago and it was already over $1000, if I multiply that out for the year it has my tax burden at close to $4000. If I understand this whole thing correctly, that means I get $3333 tax credit for the next 3 years.
This is different from the feds who are just going to give me an $8000 tax rebate (god bless those wonderful folks).
If I am misunderstanding someone please let me know??
I will be first in line May 3rd when I close (nothing is going to go wrong)! I am doing the happy dance already….I love the government!
Reality is I would have bought anyway, so it is a bonus (or is it big enough to be a windfall?).
April 14, 2010 at 1:51 PM #539978treehuggerParticipantI don’t see the problem? I am going to get the full amount.
I don’t make huge money, but I just looked at my paystub from a few weeks ago and it was already over $1000, if I multiply that out for the year it has my tax burden at close to $4000. If I understand this whole thing correctly, that means I get $3333 tax credit for the next 3 years.
This is different from the feds who are just going to give me an $8000 tax rebate (god bless those wonderful folks).
If I am misunderstanding someone please let me know??
I will be first in line May 3rd when I close (nothing is going to go wrong)! I am doing the happy dance already….I love the government!
Reality is I would have bought anyway, so it is a bonus (or is it big enough to be a windfall?).
April 14, 2010 at 1:51 PM #539709treehuggerParticipantI don’t see the problem? I am going to get the full amount.
I don’t make huge money, but I just looked at my paystub from a few weeks ago and it was already over $1000, if I multiply that out for the year it has my tax burden at close to $4000. If I understand this whole thing correctly, that means I get $3333 tax credit for the next 3 years.
This is different from the feds who are just going to give me an $8000 tax rebate (god bless those wonderful folks).
If I am misunderstanding someone please let me know??
I will be first in line May 3rd when I close (nothing is going to go wrong)! I am doing the happy dance already….I love the government!
Reality is I would have bought anyway, so it is a bonus (or is it big enough to be a windfall?).
April 14, 2010 at 1:51 PM #539615treehuggerParticipantI don’t see the problem? I am going to get the full amount.
I don’t make huge money, but I just looked at my paystub from a few weeks ago and it was already over $1000, if I multiply that out for the year it has my tax burden at close to $4000. If I understand this whole thing correctly, that means I get $3333 tax credit for the next 3 years.
This is different from the feds who are just going to give me an $8000 tax rebate (god bless those wonderful folks).
If I am misunderstanding someone please let me know??
I will be first in line May 3rd when I close (nothing is going to go wrong)! I am doing the happy dance already….I love the government!
Reality is I would have bought anyway, so it is a bonus (or is it big enough to be a windfall?).
April 14, 2010 at 1:51 PM #539148treehuggerParticipantI don’t see the problem? I am going to get the full amount.
I don’t make huge money, but I just looked at my paystub from a few weeks ago and it was already over $1000, if I multiply that out for the year it has my tax burden at close to $4000. If I understand this whole thing correctly, that means I get $3333 tax credit for the next 3 years.
This is different from the feds who are just going to give me an $8000 tax rebate (god bless those wonderful folks).
If I am misunderstanding someone please let me know??
I will be first in line May 3rd when I close (nothing is going to go wrong)! I am doing the happy dance already….I love the government!
Reality is I would have bought anyway, so it is a bonus (or is it big enough to be a windfall?).
April 15, 2010 at 5:57 AM #539453EconProfParticipantTreehugger, your last statement is telling…”I would have bought anyway…”
So let’s see, the bankrupt CA government is about to hand you a bundle of $1000s to do something you were going to do anyway. All to “support” housing prices and thus further make buying that first house more unaffordable for those faithfully renting and saving up for their down payment. And BTW, Sacramento will soon have to raise taxes on all of us, including those renters, to pay for those subsidies.
Ah that CA legislator and and governor, sure glad they are on our side.April 15, 2010 at 5:57 AM #540287EconProfParticipantTreehugger, your last statement is telling…”I would have bought anyway…”
So let’s see, the bankrupt CA government is about to hand you a bundle of $1000s to do something you were going to do anyway. All to “support” housing prices and thus further make buying that first house more unaffordable for those faithfully renting and saving up for their down payment. And BTW, Sacramento will soon have to raise taxes on all of us, including those renters, to pay for those subsidies.
Ah that CA legislator and and governor, sure glad they are on our side.April 15, 2010 at 5:57 AM #540014EconProfParticipantTreehugger, your last statement is telling…”I would have bought anyway…”
So let’s see, the bankrupt CA government is about to hand you a bundle of $1000s to do something you were going to do anyway. All to “support” housing prices and thus further make buying that first house more unaffordable for those faithfully renting and saving up for their down payment. And BTW, Sacramento will soon have to raise taxes on all of us, including those renters, to pay for those subsidies.
Ah that CA legislator and and governor, sure glad they are on our side.April 15, 2010 at 5:57 AM #539331EconProfParticipantTreehugger, your last statement is telling…”I would have bought anyway…”
So let’s see, the bankrupt CA government is about to hand you a bundle of $1000s to do something you were going to do anyway. All to “support” housing prices and thus further make buying that first house more unaffordable for those faithfully renting and saving up for their down payment. And BTW, Sacramento will soon have to raise taxes on all of us, including those renters, to pay for those subsidies.
Ah that CA legislator and and governor, sure glad they are on our side.April 15, 2010 at 5:57 AM #539919EconProfParticipantTreehugger, your last statement is telling…”I would have bought anyway…”
So let’s see, the bankrupt CA government is about to hand you a bundle of $1000s to do something you were going to do anyway. All to “support” housing prices and thus further make buying that first house more unaffordable for those faithfully renting and saving up for their down payment. And BTW, Sacramento will soon have to raise taxes on all of us, including those renters, to pay for those subsidies.
Ah that CA legislator and and governor, sure glad they are on our side.April 15, 2010 at 8:40 AM #540368livinincaliParticipantAfter itemizing taxes especially with the mortgage interest deduction you’d probably have to make a little over $100K gross to get the full credit. For example you could pay CA 4,000 dollars, normally get back 1,200 and then the tax credit would be worth 2,800 instead of 3,333. I guess the way to look at it is you won’t be paying CA taxes for the next 3 years but that might not add up to 10,000.
The other thing to think about is the stipulation in the bill that if too many people take the credit then the amount you receive will be reduced. I.e. the first time buyer credit can be reduced to a total of 5,700 or 1900 a year if too many people take it and the money runs out. There’s 100 million dollars for the first time buyers credit but it’s difficult to estimate how far that money will go because not everyone will get the full amount. I’d assume that once 15K to 20K homes are sold to first time buyers there will be some deduction in payment.
April 15, 2010 at 8:40 AM #539533livinincaliParticipantAfter itemizing taxes especially with the mortgage interest deduction you’d probably have to make a little over $100K gross to get the full credit. For example you could pay CA 4,000 dollars, normally get back 1,200 and then the tax credit would be worth 2,800 instead of 3,333. I guess the way to look at it is you won’t be paying CA taxes for the next 3 years but that might not add up to 10,000.
The other thing to think about is the stipulation in the bill that if too many people take the credit then the amount you receive will be reduced. I.e. the first time buyer credit can be reduced to a total of 5,700 or 1900 a year if too many people take it and the money runs out. There’s 100 million dollars for the first time buyers credit but it’s difficult to estimate how far that money will go because not everyone will get the full amount. I’d assume that once 15K to 20K homes are sold to first time buyers there will be some deduction in payment.
April 15, 2010 at 8:40 AM #540096livinincaliParticipantAfter itemizing taxes especially with the mortgage interest deduction you’d probably have to make a little over $100K gross to get the full credit. For example you could pay CA 4,000 dollars, normally get back 1,200 and then the tax credit would be worth 2,800 instead of 3,333. I guess the way to look at it is you won’t be paying CA taxes for the next 3 years but that might not add up to 10,000.
The other thing to think about is the stipulation in the bill that if too many people take the credit then the amount you receive will be reduced. I.e. the first time buyer credit can be reduced to a total of 5,700 or 1900 a year if too many people take it and the money runs out. There’s 100 million dollars for the first time buyers credit but it’s difficult to estimate how far that money will go because not everyone will get the full amount. I’d assume that once 15K to 20K homes are sold to first time buyers there will be some deduction in payment.
April 15, 2010 at 8:40 AM #540000livinincaliParticipantAfter itemizing taxes especially with the mortgage interest deduction you’d probably have to make a little over $100K gross to get the full credit. For example you could pay CA 4,000 dollars, normally get back 1,200 and then the tax credit would be worth 2,800 instead of 3,333. I guess the way to look at it is you won’t be paying CA taxes for the next 3 years but that might not add up to 10,000.
The other thing to think about is the stipulation in the bill that if too many people take the credit then the amount you receive will be reduced. I.e. the first time buyer credit can be reduced to a total of 5,700 or 1900 a year if too many people take it and the money runs out. There’s 100 million dollars for the first time buyers credit but it’s difficult to estimate how far that money will go because not everyone will get the full amount. I’d assume that once 15K to 20K homes are sold to first time buyers there will be some deduction in payment.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.