idea for stabilizing the housing market.

[outtamojo]

Here is a something from JTR’s site

“Do buyers pay more when sellers’ real estate agents are attractive?

Apparently so: Preliminary results of a study from Old Dominion University suggest that, put bluntly, the more attractive a male finds his female agent, the higher the price he’ll probably be willing to pay. Women also seem to be susceptible to attractive female agents, although not to the degree that men are. (Neither women nor men seem to respond much to attractive males.) “I’d like to think I wouldn’t fall prey to it,” says Seiler. “But I think that the people who were in our study would have said the exact same thing.”

Psychology of Real Estate

Deflation in home price problem solved!

[scaredyclassic]

A similar study in the 90s showed private sector lawyers were more attractive than govt lawyers.

[scaredyclassic]

A similar study in the 90s showed private sector lawyers were more attractive than govt lawyers.

[scaredyclassic]

A similar study in the 90s showed private sector lawyers were more attractive than govt lawyers.

[scaredyclassic]

A similar study in the 90s showed private sector lawyers were more attractive than govt lawyers.

[scaredyclassic]

A similar study in the 90s showed private sector lawyers were more attractive than govt lawyers.

[stockstradr]

Isn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing?

Exactly!

I think the initial post (not the one quoted above) was a bit odd, given poster should realize this is already happening. Besides, it is nutz for the original post to suggest even MORE of what is basically Ponzi Scheme support of the housing market forced upon the US taxpayer.

US government is indirectly already promising to cover like 90% of newly issuing mortgages, because if homeowners default for whatever reason (such as a price decline) then the US government (= you and me) will have to cover the bail out of those billions of mortgages that have been insured.

Oh, and YES, it is inevitable this will all end up with the US taxpayers covering the cost, but there isn’t enough tax revenue coming in to cover the cost of default of all those US government insured mortgages – which leads us again to why the US dollar is DOOMED. They will have to print huge amounts of dollars.

[stockstradr]

Isn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing?

Exactly!

I think the initial post (not the one quoted above) was a bit odd, given poster should realize this is already happening. Besides, it is nutz for the original post to suggest even MORE of what is basically Ponzi Scheme support of the housing market forced upon the US taxpayer.

US government is indirectly already promising to cover like 90% of newly issuing mortgages, because if homeowners default for whatever reason (such as a price decline) then the US government (= you and me) will have to cover the bail out of those billions of mortgages that have been insured.

Oh, and YES, it is inevitable this will all end up with the US taxpayers covering the cost, but there isn’t enough tax revenue coming in to cover the cost of default of all those US government insured mortgages – which leads us again to why the US dollar is DOOMED. They will have to print huge amounts of dollars.

[stockstradr]

Isn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing?

Exactly!

I think the initial post (not the one quoted above) was a bit odd, given poster should realize this is already happening. Besides, it is nutz for the original post to suggest even MORE of what is basically Ponzi Scheme support of the housing market forced upon the US taxpayer.

US government is indirectly already promising to cover like 90% of newly issuing mortgages, because if homeowners default for whatever reason (such as a price decline) then the US government (= you and me) will have to cover the bail out of those billions of mortgages that have been insured.

Oh, and YES, it is inevitable this will all end up with the US taxpayers covering the cost, but there isn’t enough tax revenue coming in to cover the cost of default of all those US government insured mortgages – which leads us again to why the US dollar is DOOMED. They will have to print huge amounts of dollars.

[stockstradr]

Isn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing?

Exactly!

I think the initial post (not the one quoted above) was a bit odd, given poster should realize this is already happening. Besides, it is nutz for the original post to suggest even MORE of what is basically Ponzi Scheme support of the housing market forced upon the US taxpayer.

US government is indirectly already promising to cover like 90% of newly issuing mortgages, because if homeowners default for whatever reason (such as a price decline) then the US government (= you and me) will have to cover the bail out of those billions of mortgages that have been insured.

Oh, and YES, it is inevitable this will all end up with the US taxpayers covering the cost, but there isn’t enough tax revenue coming in to cover the cost of default of all those US government insured mortgages – which leads us again to why the US dollar is DOOMED. They will have to print huge amounts of dollars.

[stockstradr]

Isn’t that pretty much what they’re already doing?

Exactly!

I think the initial post (not the one quoted above) was a bit odd, given poster should realize this is already happening. Besides, it is nutz for the original post to suggest even MORE of what is basically Ponzi Scheme support of the housing market forced upon the US taxpayer.

US government is indirectly already promising to cover like 90% of newly issuing mortgages, because if homeowners default for whatever reason (such as a price decline) then the US government (= you and me) will have to cover the bail out of those billions of mortgages that have been insured.

Oh, and YES, it is inevitable this will all end up with the US taxpayers covering the cost, but there isn’t enough tax revenue coming in to cover the cost of default of all those US government insured mortgages – which leads us again to why the US dollar is DOOMED. They will have to print huge amounts of dollars.

[sreeb]

Better yet, the govenment buys forclosures from the banks and demos them:

1) It puts money in the banks hands. They will pay it out in bonuses which will eventually stimulate the economy.

2) It reduces the supply making the remaining inventory more valuable. No more below water loans.

3) It provides demo jobs.

4) You may get a nifty mini park right next door.

All we need is a catchy name like “cash for caves” and we are good to go.

[sreeb]

Better yet, the govenment buys forclosures from the banks and demos them:

1) It puts money in the banks hands. They will pay it out in bonuses which will eventually stimulate the economy.

2) It reduces the supply making the remaining inventory more valuable. No more below water loans.

3) It provides demo jobs.

4) You may get a nifty mini park right next door.

All we need is a catchy name like “cash for caves” and we are good to go.

[sreeb]

Better yet, the govenment buys forclosures from the banks and demos them:

1) It puts money in the banks hands. They will pay it out in bonuses which will eventually stimulate the economy.

2) It reduces the supply making the remaining inventory more valuable. No more below water loans.

3) It provides demo jobs.

4) You may get a nifty mini park right next door.

All we need is a catchy name like “cash for caves” and we are good to go.

[sreeb]

Better yet, the govenment buys forclosures from the banks and demos them:

1) It puts money in the banks hands. They will pay it out in bonuses which will eventually stimulate the economy.

2) It reduces the supply making the remaining inventory more valuable. No more below water loans.

3) It provides demo jobs.

4) You may get a nifty mini park right next door.

All we need is a catchy name like “cash for caves” and we are good to go.

[Author]

Posts