- This topic has 265 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 30, 2008 at 9:03 PM #264157August 30, 2008 at 10:42 PM #263900RaybyrnesParticipant
That seems like an excellent solution and very professional way simplifying what cold otherwise be a complicated situation.
August 30, 2008 at 10:42 PM #264109RaybyrnesParticipantThat seems like an excellent solution and very professional way simplifying what cold otherwise be a complicated situation.
August 30, 2008 at 10:42 PM #264113RaybyrnesParticipantThat seems like an excellent solution and very professional way simplifying what cold otherwise be a complicated situation.
August 30, 2008 at 10:42 PM #264166RaybyrnesParticipantThat seems like an excellent solution and very professional way simplifying what cold otherwise be a complicated situation.
August 30, 2008 at 10:42 PM #264202RaybyrnesParticipantThat seems like an excellent solution and very professional way simplifying what cold otherwise be a complicated situation.
August 31, 2008 at 7:49 AM #263980EconProfParticipantThat was a smart move from several standpoints. It tells the LL you are paying rent, and he’ll get his due if he does the right thing. It tells the bank and LL you have someone to negotiate on your behalf for an interim solution. Finally, it shows you cannot be pushed around by empty legal threats by either of the other two parties.
August 31, 2008 at 7:49 AM #264188EconProfParticipantThat was a smart move from several standpoints. It tells the LL you are paying rent, and he’ll get his due if he does the right thing. It tells the bank and LL you have someone to negotiate on your behalf for an interim solution. Finally, it shows you cannot be pushed around by empty legal threats by either of the other two parties.
August 31, 2008 at 7:49 AM #264193EconProfParticipantThat was a smart move from several standpoints. It tells the LL you are paying rent, and he’ll get his due if he does the right thing. It tells the bank and LL you have someone to negotiate on your behalf for an interim solution. Finally, it shows you cannot be pushed around by empty legal threats by either of the other two parties.
August 31, 2008 at 7:49 AM #264246EconProfParticipantThat was a smart move from several standpoints. It tells the LL you are paying rent, and he’ll get his due if he does the right thing. It tells the bank and LL you have someone to negotiate on your behalf for an interim solution. Finally, it shows you cannot be pushed around by empty legal threats by either of the other two parties.
August 31, 2008 at 7:49 AM #264285EconProfParticipantThat was a smart move from several standpoints. It tells the LL you are paying rent, and he’ll get his due if he does the right thing. It tells the bank and LL you have someone to negotiate on your behalf for an interim solution. Finally, it shows you cannot be pushed around by empty legal threats by either of the other two parties.
September 17, 2008 at 6:30 AM #271305jrsygirl9ParticipantOne last note… We agreed to withdrawl the sept rent from escrow and pay to him in exchange for him signing the short sale offer. We have already been in contact with the bank so (small investment bank- easy to get through to negotiator) looks like we will own this property in about 30 days.
the rest of the rent is being escrowed should there be a hold up with the sale. No one gets any money until the transaction is complete. Once we own the house he gets any rent monies due.
On a personal note… I think the law that allows LL’s to collect rent on a foreclosing property with no intent to resolve the loan is pretty crappy. That law should be changed.
September 17, 2008 at 6:30 AM #271541jrsygirl9ParticipantOne last note… We agreed to withdrawl the sept rent from escrow and pay to him in exchange for him signing the short sale offer. We have already been in contact with the bank so (small investment bank- easy to get through to negotiator) looks like we will own this property in about 30 days.
the rest of the rent is being escrowed should there be a hold up with the sale. No one gets any money until the transaction is complete. Once we own the house he gets any rent monies due.
On a personal note… I think the law that allows LL’s to collect rent on a foreclosing property with no intent to resolve the loan is pretty crappy. That law should be changed.
September 17, 2008 at 6:30 AM #271554jrsygirl9ParticipantOne last note… We agreed to withdrawl the sept rent from escrow and pay to him in exchange for him signing the short sale offer. We have already been in contact with the bank so (small investment bank- easy to get through to negotiator) looks like we will own this property in about 30 days.
the rest of the rent is being escrowed should there be a hold up with the sale. No one gets any money until the transaction is complete. Once we own the house he gets any rent monies due.
On a personal note… I think the law that allows LL’s to collect rent on a foreclosing property with no intent to resolve the loan is pretty crappy. That law should be changed.
September 17, 2008 at 6:30 AM #271592jrsygirl9ParticipantOne last note… We agreed to withdrawl the sept rent from escrow and pay to him in exchange for him signing the short sale offer. We have already been in contact with the bank so (small investment bank- easy to get through to negotiator) looks like we will own this property in about 30 days.
the rest of the rent is being escrowed should there be a hold up with the sale. No one gets any money until the transaction is complete. Once we own the house he gets any rent monies due.
On a personal note… I think the law that allows LL’s to collect rent on a foreclosing property with no intent to resolve the loan is pretty crappy. That law should be changed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.