Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › HS teacher-$70K for 9 months of work
- This topic has 470 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM #482287November 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM #481456
outtamojo
ParticipantI didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.
November 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM #481625outtamojo
ParticipantI didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.
November 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM #481990outtamojo
ParticipantI didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.
November 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM #482069outtamojo
ParticipantI didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.
November 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM #482292outtamojo
ParticipantI didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.
November 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM #481471dbapig
Participant[quote=outtamojo]I didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.[/quote]
haha, I once heard of a math prof who quit teaching Math 1A (not sure just undergrad or entirely) at UC Berkeley because he was disappointed by the level of the students. I think he was assuming the students would be at the level of MIT or something…
November 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM #481640dbapig
Participant[quote=outtamojo]I didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.[/quote]
haha, I once heard of a math prof who quit teaching Math 1A (not sure just undergrad or entirely) at UC Berkeley because he was disappointed by the level of the students. I think he was assuming the students would be at the level of MIT or something…
November 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM #482005dbapig
Participant[quote=outtamojo]I didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.[/quote]
haha, I once heard of a math prof who quit teaching Math 1A (not sure just undergrad or entirely) at UC Berkeley because he was disappointed by the level of the students. I think he was assuming the students would be at the level of MIT or something…
November 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM #482083dbapig
Participant[quote=outtamojo]I didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.[/quote]
haha, I once heard of a math prof who quit teaching Math 1A (not sure just undergrad or entirely) at UC Berkeley because he was disappointed by the level of the students. I think he was assuming the students would be at the level of MIT or something…
November 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM #482307dbapig
Participant[quote=outtamojo]I didn’t mind Ochem, for me, it was Enzyme Kinetics. The professor stated outright that “nobody gets this stuff” and the school was basically wasting everyone’s time offering the class to undergrads.[/quote]
haha, I once heard of a math prof who quit teaching Math 1A (not sure just undergrad or entirely) at UC Berkeley because he was disappointed by the level of the students. I think he was assuming the students would be at the level of MIT or something…
November 12, 2009 at 12:17 PM #481461dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]You people crack me up. Arguing about whether someone deserves to make $100K or $70K a year or whatever. Meanwhile the hedge fund managers and Goldman Sachs goons are raking in millions a year by gutting your country and stealing your tax money. Nary a peep about whether they’re overpaid, let’s instead focus on a principal making $150K or a teacher making $70K or whatever.
This country is doomed! Back to sleep, everyone…[/quote]
People on this thread are arguing about teachers’ pay because, well, the thread is about teachers’ pay.
I’m sure people would rant about the excessive profit the fund managers are making in a relevant thread. And yes the country is doomed because we don’t care as much about the education for our kids as we should.
November 12, 2009 at 12:17 PM #481630dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]You people crack me up. Arguing about whether someone deserves to make $100K or $70K a year or whatever. Meanwhile the hedge fund managers and Goldman Sachs goons are raking in millions a year by gutting your country and stealing your tax money. Nary a peep about whether they’re overpaid, let’s instead focus on a principal making $150K or a teacher making $70K or whatever.
This country is doomed! Back to sleep, everyone…[/quote]
People on this thread are arguing about teachers’ pay because, well, the thread is about teachers’ pay.
I’m sure people would rant about the excessive profit the fund managers are making in a relevant thread. And yes the country is doomed because we don’t care as much about the education for our kids as we should.
November 12, 2009 at 12:17 PM #481995dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]You people crack me up. Arguing about whether someone deserves to make $100K or $70K a year or whatever. Meanwhile the hedge fund managers and Goldman Sachs goons are raking in millions a year by gutting your country and stealing your tax money. Nary a peep about whether they’re overpaid, let’s instead focus on a principal making $150K or a teacher making $70K or whatever.
This country is doomed! Back to sleep, everyone…[/quote]
People on this thread are arguing about teachers’ pay because, well, the thread is about teachers’ pay.
I’m sure people would rant about the excessive profit the fund managers are making in a relevant thread. And yes the country is doomed because we don’t care as much about the education for our kids as we should.
November 12, 2009 at 12:17 PM #482074dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]You people crack me up. Arguing about whether someone deserves to make $100K or $70K a year or whatever. Meanwhile the hedge fund managers and Goldman Sachs goons are raking in millions a year by gutting your country and stealing your tax money. Nary a peep about whether they’re overpaid, let’s instead focus on a principal making $150K or a teacher making $70K or whatever.
This country is doomed! Back to sleep, everyone…[/quote]
People on this thread are arguing about teachers’ pay because, well, the thread is about teachers’ pay.
I’m sure people would rant about the excessive profit the fund managers are making in a relevant thread. And yes the country is doomed because we don’t care as much about the education for our kids as we should.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
