Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › How to lowball a builder
- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by sheilawellington.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 2, 2008 at 2:29 PM #180212April 2, 2008 at 3:24 PM #179781crParticipant
I’m in the SFV too and many people here think LA is insulated even though we’ve already seen 17-20% depending on where you look. I believe LA is behind SD by 6-12 months in terms of trends and will still fall 20% or so in the next year.
You can always raise your low-ball offer, but you can’t reduce it once they accept.
You have the money, they have a depreciating asset.
April 2, 2008 at 3:24 PM #180150crParticipantI’m in the SFV too and many people here think LA is insulated even though we’ve already seen 17-20% depending on where you look. I believe LA is behind SD by 6-12 months in terms of trends and will still fall 20% or so in the next year.
You can always raise your low-ball offer, but you can’t reduce it once they accept.
You have the money, they have a depreciating asset.
April 2, 2008 at 3:24 PM #180151crParticipantI’m in the SFV too and many people here think LA is insulated even though we’ve already seen 17-20% depending on where you look. I believe LA is behind SD by 6-12 months in terms of trends and will still fall 20% or so in the next year.
You can always raise your low-ball offer, but you can’t reduce it once they accept.
You have the money, they have a depreciating asset.
April 2, 2008 at 3:24 PM #180168crParticipantI’m in the SFV too and many people here think LA is insulated even though we’ve already seen 17-20% depending on where you look. I believe LA is behind SD by 6-12 months in terms of trends and will still fall 20% or so in the next year.
You can always raise your low-ball offer, but you can’t reduce it once they accept.
You have the money, they have a depreciating asset.
April 2, 2008 at 3:24 PM #180242crParticipantI’m in the SFV too and many people here think LA is insulated even though we’ve already seen 17-20% depending on where you look. I believe LA is behind SD by 6-12 months in terms of trends and will still fall 20% or so in the next year.
You can always raise your low-ball offer, but you can’t reduce it once they accept.
You have the money, they have a depreciating asset.
April 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM #180002sd_mattParticipantTuba
You mentioned timing for builders. Whats the best timing for banks with a REO property?April 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM #180461sd_mattParticipantTuba
You mentioned timing for builders. Whats the best timing for banks with a REO property?April 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM #180386sd_mattParticipantTuba
You mentioned timing for builders. Whats the best timing for banks with a REO property?April 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM #180373sd_mattParticipantTuba
You mentioned timing for builders. Whats the best timing for banks with a REO property?April 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM #180369sd_mattParticipantTuba
You mentioned timing for builders. Whats the best timing for banks with a REO property?April 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM #180146sheilawellingtonParticipantsd_matt, I don’t think banks have to meet sales targets in a given calendar/fiscal quarter. What I’ve heard from accountant friends, is that internal and external auditors are pressuring the banks (very effectively) to mark their assets to market.
Without this “pressure” banks’ asset managers would be happy to keep a REO property on their books at a fantasy price (say, whatever the defaulted loan amount was). Over time, as they value their assets at more realistic prices, it becomes easier to sell them because they are not as ridiculously overpriced as only a year ago.
April 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM #180514sheilawellingtonParticipantsd_matt, I don’t think banks have to meet sales targets in a given calendar/fiscal quarter. What I’ve heard from accountant friends, is that internal and external auditors are pressuring the banks (very effectively) to mark their assets to market.
Without this “pressure” banks’ asset managers would be happy to keep a REO property on their books at a fantasy price (say, whatever the defaulted loan amount was). Over time, as they value their assets at more realistic prices, it becomes easier to sell them because they are not as ridiculously overpriced as only a year ago.
April 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM #180518sheilawellingtonParticipantsd_matt, I don’t think banks have to meet sales targets in a given calendar/fiscal quarter. What I’ve heard from accountant friends, is that internal and external auditors are pressuring the banks (very effectively) to mark their assets to market.
Without this “pressure” banks’ asset managers would be happy to keep a REO property on their books at a fantasy price (say, whatever the defaulted loan amount was). Over time, as they value their assets at more realistic prices, it becomes easier to sell them because they are not as ridiculously overpriced as only a year ago.
April 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM #180530sheilawellingtonParticipantsd_matt, I don’t think banks have to meet sales targets in a given calendar/fiscal quarter. What I’ve heard from accountant friends, is that internal and external auditors are pressuring the banks (very effectively) to mark their assets to market.
Without this “pressure” banks’ asset managers would be happy to keep a REO property on their books at a fantasy price (say, whatever the defaulted loan amount was). Over time, as they value their assets at more realistic prices, it becomes easier to sell them because they are not as ridiculously overpriced as only a year ago.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.