- This topic has 40 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 16, 2007 at 11:57 AM #118517December 16, 2007 at 11:59 AM #118528patientlywaitingParticipant
We are going to have more than 2 million foreclosures as a result of the mortgage meltdown.
Add to that another 3 million homeowners who will walk away. That’s my gut feeling.
December 16, 2007 at 11:59 AM #118550patientlywaitingParticipantWe are going to have more than 2 million foreclosures as a result of the mortgage meltdown.
Add to that another 3 million homeowners who will walk away. That’s my gut feeling.
December 16, 2007 at 11:59 AM #118489patientlywaitingParticipantWe are going to have more than 2 million foreclosures as a result of the mortgage meltdown.
Add to that another 3 million homeowners who will walk away. That’s my gut feeling.
December 16, 2007 at 11:59 AM #118321patientlywaitingParticipantWe are going to have more than 2 million foreclosures as a result of the mortgage meltdown.
Add to that another 3 million homeowners who will walk away. That’s my gut feeling.
December 16, 2007 at 11:59 AM #118455patientlywaitingParticipantWe are going to have more than 2 million foreclosures as a result of the mortgage meltdown.
Add to that another 3 million homeowners who will walk away. That’s my gut feeling.
December 16, 2007 at 2:14 PM #118503ArrayaParticipant“Bad timing for the banks because the new law encourages people decide to walk from their mortgages rather than their credit card debts (which can no longer be discharged).”
Not sure what you mean by this. I was speaking of stricter eligibility for chapter 7 Filing. I think the fact that their home prices are so inflated and the disparity between thier motgage payment and what they can rent the same place for that encourages them to walk away.
“Underwriting is now upside-down where mortgages are riskier than credit card loans. Big problem for the banks is that mortgages pay low interest rates but have high risks. It’ll take the banks a few years to rethink their business models.”
agreed
December 16, 2007 at 2:14 PM #118537ArrayaParticipant“Bad timing for the banks because the new law encourages people decide to walk from their mortgages rather than their credit card debts (which can no longer be discharged).”
Not sure what you mean by this. I was speaking of stricter eligibility for chapter 7 Filing. I think the fact that their home prices are so inflated and the disparity between thier motgage payment and what they can rent the same place for that encourages them to walk away.
“Underwriting is now upside-down where mortgages are riskier than credit card loans. Big problem for the banks is that mortgages pay low interest rates but have high risks. It’ll take the banks a few years to rethink their business models.”
agreed
December 16, 2007 at 2:14 PM #118371ArrayaParticipant“Bad timing for the banks because the new law encourages people decide to walk from their mortgages rather than their credit card debts (which can no longer be discharged).”
Not sure what you mean by this. I was speaking of stricter eligibility for chapter 7 Filing. I think the fact that their home prices are so inflated and the disparity between thier motgage payment and what they can rent the same place for that encourages them to walk away.
“Underwriting is now upside-down where mortgages are riskier than credit card loans. Big problem for the banks is that mortgages pay low interest rates but have high risks. It’ll take the banks a few years to rethink their business models.”
agreed
December 16, 2007 at 2:14 PM #118577ArrayaParticipant“Bad timing for the banks because the new law encourages people decide to walk from their mortgages rather than their credit card debts (which can no longer be discharged).”
Not sure what you mean by this. I was speaking of stricter eligibility for chapter 7 Filing. I think the fact that their home prices are so inflated and the disparity between thier motgage payment and what they can rent the same place for that encourages them to walk away.
“Underwriting is now upside-down where mortgages are riskier than credit card loans. Big problem for the banks is that mortgages pay low interest rates but have high risks. It’ll take the banks a few years to rethink their business models.”
agreed
December 16, 2007 at 2:14 PM #118600ArrayaParticipant“Bad timing for the banks because the new law encourages people decide to walk from their mortgages rather than their credit card debts (which can no longer be discharged).”
Not sure what you mean by this. I was speaking of stricter eligibility for chapter 7 Filing. I think the fact that their home prices are so inflated and the disparity between thier motgage payment and what they can rent the same place for that encourages them to walk away.
“Underwriting is now upside-down where mortgages are riskier than credit card loans. Big problem for the banks is that mortgages pay low interest rates but have high risks. It’ll take the banks a few years to rethink their business models.”
agreed
December 16, 2007 at 6:33 PM #118511EugeneParticipantNumbers from calculatedrisk are misleading (I’d even say inaccurate). 20% nationwide decline is the average of 50% decline in California and maybe 10% in Minnesota.
Personally I expect 50% default rate among all homes bought or refinanced in CA/AZ/NV/FL between mid-2004 and 2007. Something like 700k foreclosures in CA and 50k foreclosures in San Diego county.
December 16, 2007 at 6:33 PM #118643EugeneParticipantNumbers from calculatedrisk are misleading (I’d even say inaccurate). 20% nationwide decline is the average of 50% decline in California and maybe 10% in Minnesota.
Personally I expect 50% default rate among all homes bought or refinanced in CA/AZ/NV/FL between mid-2004 and 2007. Something like 700k foreclosures in CA and 50k foreclosures in San Diego county.
December 16, 2007 at 6:33 PM #118739EugeneParticipantNumbers from calculatedrisk are misleading (I’d even say inaccurate). 20% nationwide decline is the average of 50% decline in California and maybe 10% in Minnesota.
Personally I expect 50% default rate among all homes bought or refinanced in CA/AZ/NV/FL between mid-2004 and 2007. Something like 700k foreclosures in CA and 50k foreclosures in San Diego county.
December 16, 2007 at 6:33 PM #118677EugeneParticipantNumbers from calculatedrisk are misleading (I’d even say inaccurate). 20% nationwide decline is the average of 50% decline in California and maybe 10% in Minnesota.
Personally I expect 50% default rate among all homes bought or refinanced in CA/AZ/NV/FL between mid-2004 and 2007. Something like 700k foreclosures in CA and 50k foreclosures in San Diego county.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.