Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › How long until US default?
- This topic has 130 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 23, 2008 at 6:23 PM #274734September 23, 2008 at 9:42 PM #274484jonnycsdParticipant
Let’s say that I lease an apartment for $1000/month and I intend to continue leasing it for the next 100 years and pay as I go, out of my future earnings. Does it mean that I have $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 million in debt?
This analogy must be adjusted to get apples to apples.
Let’s say that you sign a 100 year lease for an apartment at $1000/month. YES, THIS MEANS THAT YOU HAVE $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 MILLION IN DEBT! Unless you PLAN to break the lease (equivalnt to telling those retirees, right when they need the money, that, sorry, no Social Security or Medical Care.)
To make it EVEN WORSE, if you do what the Federal Govt is doing, you start puting the monthly rent on your credit cards. Even though you make $800 a month after tax you spend that on a car, going out to eat and NEVER pay down your accumulating credit card debt. Your plan is to continue like this for the next 100 years.
It is not sustainable.
September 23, 2008 at 9:42 PM #274731jonnycsdParticipantLet’s say that I lease an apartment for $1000/month and I intend to continue leasing it for the next 100 years and pay as I go, out of my future earnings. Does it mean that I have $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 million in debt?
This analogy must be adjusted to get apples to apples.
Let’s say that you sign a 100 year lease for an apartment at $1000/month. YES, THIS MEANS THAT YOU HAVE $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 MILLION IN DEBT! Unless you PLAN to break the lease (equivalnt to telling those retirees, right when they need the money, that, sorry, no Social Security or Medical Care.)
To make it EVEN WORSE, if you do what the Federal Govt is doing, you start puting the monthly rent on your credit cards. Even though you make $800 a month after tax you spend that on a car, going out to eat and NEVER pay down your accumulating credit card debt. Your plan is to continue like this for the next 100 years.
It is not sustainable.
September 23, 2008 at 9:42 PM #274735jonnycsdParticipantLet’s say that I lease an apartment for $1000/month and I intend to continue leasing it for the next 100 years and pay as I go, out of my future earnings. Does it mean that I have $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 million in debt?
This analogy must be adjusted to get apples to apples.
Let’s say that you sign a 100 year lease for an apartment at $1000/month. YES, THIS MEANS THAT YOU HAVE $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 MILLION IN DEBT! Unless you PLAN to break the lease (equivalnt to telling those retirees, right when they need the money, that, sorry, no Social Security or Medical Care.)
To make it EVEN WORSE, if you do what the Federal Govt is doing, you start puting the monthly rent on your credit cards. Even though you make $800 a month after tax you spend that on a car, going out to eat and NEVER pay down your accumulating credit card debt. Your plan is to continue like this for the next 100 years.
It is not sustainable.
September 23, 2008 at 9:42 PM #274782jonnycsdParticipantLet’s say that I lease an apartment for $1000/month and I intend to continue leasing it for the next 100 years and pay as I go, out of my future earnings. Does it mean that I have $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 million in debt?
This analogy must be adjusted to get apples to apples.
Let’s say that you sign a 100 year lease for an apartment at $1000/month. YES, THIS MEANS THAT YOU HAVE $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 MILLION IN DEBT! Unless you PLAN to break the lease (equivalnt to telling those retirees, right when they need the money, that, sorry, no Social Security or Medical Care.)
To make it EVEN WORSE, if you do what the Federal Govt is doing, you start puting the monthly rent on your credit cards. Even though you make $800 a month after tax you spend that on a car, going out to eat and NEVER pay down your accumulating credit card debt. Your plan is to continue like this for the next 100 years.
It is not sustainable.
September 23, 2008 at 9:42 PM #274804jonnycsdParticipantLet’s say that I lease an apartment for $1000/month and I intend to continue leasing it for the next 100 years and pay as I go, out of my future earnings. Does it mean that I have $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 million in debt?
This analogy must be adjusted to get apples to apples.
Let’s say that you sign a 100 year lease for an apartment at $1000/month. YES, THIS MEANS THAT YOU HAVE $1000 * 12 * 100 = $1.2 MILLION IN DEBT! Unless you PLAN to break the lease (equivalnt to telling those retirees, right when they need the money, that, sorry, no Social Security or Medical Care.)
To make it EVEN WORSE, if you do what the Federal Govt is doing, you start puting the monthly rent on your credit cards. Even though you make $800 a month after tax you spend that on a car, going out to eat and NEVER pay down your accumulating credit card debt. Your plan is to continue like this for the next 100 years.
It is not sustainable.
September 23, 2008 at 10:07 PM #274508peterbParticipantAll these scenarios are made better for the debtor by having inflation. So that’s why they do it. But they have to be careful to not over do it.
But, I have to agree that as we grow this debt, the world will want a higher rate of return to compensate for the risk.
September 23, 2008 at 10:07 PM #274756peterbParticipantAll these scenarios are made better for the debtor by having inflation. So that’s why they do it. But they have to be careful to not over do it.
But, I have to agree that as we grow this debt, the world will want a higher rate of return to compensate for the risk.
September 23, 2008 at 10:07 PM #274760peterbParticipantAll these scenarios are made better for the debtor by having inflation. So that’s why they do it. But they have to be careful to not over do it.
But, I have to agree that as we grow this debt, the world will want a higher rate of return to compensate for the risk.
September 23, 2008 at 10:07 PM #274808peterbParticipantAll these scenarios are made better for the debtor by having inflation. So that’s why they do it. But they have to be careful to not over do it.
But, I have to agree that as we grow this debt, the world will want a higher rate of return to compensate for the risk.
September 23, 2008 at 10:07 PM #274829peterbParticipantAll these scenarios are made better for the debtor by having inflation. So that’s why they do it. But they have to be careful to not over do it.
But, I have to agree that as we grow this debt, the world will want a higher rate of return to compensate for the risk.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.