- This topic has 42 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 11 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 16, 2007 at 8:09 AM #43488January 16, 2007 at 8:27 AM #43490TheBreezeParticipant
I think there have been some studies done that say once you have enough assets that you can live on 3% to 4% of that, then you don’t need to work anymore. I’m sure $100,000 per year would be plenty for me, so I would need between $2.5 million and $3.3 million to never have to work again. You can read more about this stuff here:
January 16, 2007 at 8:59 AM #43491calidesignerParticipantI often think of Bill Gates when questions of wealth/success come up. I’m no student of his trust me. However, I do wonder if he genuninely considers himself “successful”. Does he consider himself wealthy? Or is he continuously chasing the illusive realm of “I’ve made it, this is it”…
I am the sort who day-dreams about financial wealth but frankly isn’t the sort who is capable or willing to do what it takes. As a result, as financial needs increase (car, rent, children etc., 401k), I take steps necessary to fulfill those obligations, such as getting a better-paying job, taking an exam, courses, etc. I guess I like my weekends and sleeping in on Saturdays a bit much!
I don’t have what it takes to be a billionaire, and I say this because I sense that besides intelligence, timing and financial acumen, a person needs to be, in my opinion, somewhat pathelogically obsessed (or driven you might say), to really “make it”, such as Bill Gates, Richard Branson, etc. So you see, I make myself happy by convincing myself that infact really really rich people are essentially slightly demented. I’m normal, yeah! Maybe if inflation keeps up I might be a millionaire by my sixties, huh? Unless my 401(k) tanks! Nonetheless, I am serious about not getting bamboozled by the local-socal housing market. The last few years have got me upset enough to take the time to learn as much as I can, as Perry Chase says, so I can perhaps actually make housing work for me, or at least not work against me. This site and the contributors have opened my eyes over the past year, given me psychological support and data to counter the “owning a home is a blessing” crowd (yes it would be if I hade bought 10 years ago but I didn’t have a real job back then). Thanks to all of you…and may 2007 bring good sense and hasten the collapse of our glorious housing market.
calidesigner
January 16, 2007 at 10:18 AM #43496DoofratParticipantI think it differs depending on the person. For my wife and I, I think we’d have to agree with “the breeze” that being wealthy for us would be not having to work for a living, but have enough money to travel when we want to.
January 16, 2007 at 9:17 PM #43550sdnativesonParticipantI agree with sdrealtor. He has the proper perspective. I find that his perspective/belief being so easily dismissed fascinating, and more than a little sad.
Some might find this interesting;January 16, 2007 at 9:18 PM #43552sdrealtorParticipantInteresting read sdnativeson. While I know very little about Bhuddhism my older brother (very successful but previously very unhappy and self-destructive)is a practicing Bhuddhist and it saved his life IMHO.
January 16, 2007 at 9:53 PM #43558sdnativesonParticipantYou might know little about Buddhism, but it sounds like you know about life sdrealtor. I added that for all the other posters, maybe it will give them pause.
Thank you for sharing about your brother.January 17, 2007 at 6:10 AM #43563BikeRiderParticipantThe story of Bill Gates is rather interesting. He was just some computer geek. Would show up at computer trade shows unshaven and needing a bath. Actually stunk. It was mostly timing for him. IBM needed a PC. They were looking for an OS. They went to Bill’s place and I think they sent IBM to this other software company. The guy that owned that shop was out and his second in command would not sign a non-disclosure aggreement. So, IBM goes back to Bill’s place and Bill says, sure, I’ll sign whatever. Then Bill buys some other guys OS for like $50K, tweeks it a bit, tells IBM that EVERY PC must have it’s own box of DOS, and the rest is history. He got lots of money to work with. Then Apple and him steal Xerox’s mouse idea and on and on.
As for wealth, you can be wealthy many ways. I think this thread was started thinking of money. For me, I want a mix. Good friends and also I don’t want to worry about paying the bills. My wife and I combined make $160K. We have a paid for house that the county assess at $280K. We have around $40K in savings and other money invested, plus the old 401K. So, we are not really wealthy and by no means can retire. I hope one day we can retire and have enough money to do a little traveling. I think if I can always do that, be happy, have good friends…… I will always feel wealthy.
January 17, 2007 at 8:29 AM #43572AnonymousGuestNice parable; thanks, sns.
No one on this forum likes Christianity, but it teaches one to value the important things in life.
Little appreciated observation: the late Pope John Paul wrote a few years ago that because Westerners had fallen away from Christianity but still needed an anchor in life, they turned to Eastern mysticism and meditation. He stated that Catholics needed to return to praying the rosary, which is a form of meditation. I do so (abbreviated form) on my morning walks with my dog, and find it relaxing and comforting. I think my dog finds it perplexing (ha, ha).
January 17, 2007 at 8:52 AM #43576nooneParticipantI agree with sdrealtor. He has the proper perspective. I find that his perspective/belief being so easily dismissed fascinating, and more than a little sad.
Yes, sdrealtor definitely has the proper definition of success or happiness. In fact every month or so, while my wife points out all the things that we don’t have, I have to remind her of all the things that we do have. We have two beautiful, happy children, a roof over our heads, clothes on our back, and never go to bed hungry (unless we’re trying to lose a few pounds), and time to spend with each other. Those are the things that are really important in life.
I think those who dismiss this as a valid response, are doing so because the original question was about wealth, not about happiness or success. Since the primary definition of wealth is An abundance of valuable material possessions or resources; riches, they are trying to answer that question.
January 17, 2007 at 9:58 AM #43581sdnativesonParticipantObviously I gave the impression that I am or may be buddhist – which I am not, I am a practicing Catholic. I believe that to grow in my chosen faith I need to know more not just about it, but other faiths as well. I can say that for the most part, I have found “gold” in most all (MKP speak).
I concur, Western civilization has fallen away from Christianity (IMHO to it’s detriment). Still, religous or faith affiliation of any nature(sadly, as we all know) doesn’t necessarily mean there is any deep-rooted desire to better oneself and/or those around them. However, That does not invalidate the acheivements, beliefs, values, morals of those who do.January 17, 2007 at 10:18 AM #43582sdnativesonParticipantnoone; or, an abundance or profusion of something desirable, which can be construed as, well whatever you want, right? Your point though, is accurate.
Of course, your children, wife, roof over your heads, clothes on your backs and food in your stomach are all tangible items are they not?January 17, 2007 at 1:03 PM #43599AnonymousGuestsns, I’ll ask the question on behalf of PC, lk, kjm, et al.: why are you practicing Catholics so darned judgemental and intolerant?
January 17, 2007 at 1:04 PM #43601jztzParticipantWealth means satisfaction and independence.
Satisfaction — always get what I want, and I want not much more than what I need.
Independence — work because I’d like to, not because I have to.
If you feel that you have all the options in life open to you, limited not by financial resources, then you’re fairly wealthy.
January 17, 2007 at 1:13 PM #43603sdnativesonParticipantjg; a subconcious desire to be liberal?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.