- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by evolusd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 22, 2011 at 9:06 AM #19059August 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM #722498briansd1Guest
mark-to-market rules have been eased.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/09/29/daily31.html
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/02/news/fair.value.fortune/index.htm
August 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM #722590briansd1Guestmark-to-market rules have been eased.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/09/29/daily31.html
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/02/news/fair.value.fortune/index.htm
August 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM #723701briansd1Guestmark-to-market rules have been eased.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/09/29/daily31.html
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/02/news/fair.value.fortune/index.htm
August 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM #723342briansd1Guestmark-to-market rules have been eased.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/09/29/daily31.html
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/02/news/fair.value.fortune/index.htm
August 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM #723190briansd1Guestmark-to-market rules have been eased.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/09/29/daily31.html
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/02/news/fair.value.fortune/index.htm
August 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM #723422evolusdParticipantQuote:
“The new FASB rules could help boost banks’ earnings by making it clear that institutions can account for mortgage-backed securities and other assets based on their internal estimates of cash flow and other factors, rather than relying on sales prices in largely inactive markets.”
This seems to address accounting for MBS – I’m inquiring about the loans that Banks hold directly in their portfolio. When a Borrower stops paying, the Bank has to address that change in some way on their balance sheet, typically through an increased reserve. They can’t PV the income stream because there isn’t one anymore, so you’d think they’d have to take into consideration their collateral value and reserve accordingly.
August 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM #723938evolusdParticipantQuote:
“The new FASB rules could help boost banks’ earnings by making it clear that institutions can account for mortgage-backed securities and other assets based on their internal estimates of cash flow and other factors, rather than relying on sales prices in largely inactive markets.”
This seems to address accounting for MBS – I’m inquiring about the loans that Banks hold directly in their portfolio. When a Borrower stops paying, the Bank has to address that change in some way on their balance sheet, typically through an increased reserve. They can’t PV the income stream because there isn’t one anymore, so you’d think they’d have to take into consideration their collateral value and reserve accordingly.
August 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM #723576evolusdParticipantQuote:
“The new FASB rules could help boost banks’ earnings by making it clear that institutions can account for mortgage-backed securities and other assets based on their internal estimates of cash flow and other factors, rather than relying on sales prices in largely inactive markets.”
This seems to address accounting for MBS – I’m inquiring about the loans that Banks hold directly in their portfolio. When a Borrower stops paying, the Bank has to address that change in some way on their balance sheet, typically through an increased reserve. They can’t PV the income stream because there isn’t one anymore, so you’d think they’d have to take into consideration their collateral value and reserve accordingly.
August 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM #722736evolusdParticipantQuote:
“The new FASB rules could help boost banks’ earnings by making it clear that institutions can account for mortgage-backed securities and other assets based on their internal estimates of cash flow and other factors, rather than relying on sales prices in largely inactive markets.”
This seems to address accounting for MBS – I’m inquiring about the loans that Banks hold directly in their portfolio. When a Borrower stops paying, the Bank has to address that change in some way on their balance sheet, typically through an increased reserve. They can’t PV the income stream because there isn’t one anymore, so you’d think they’d have to take into consideration their collateral value and reserve accordingly.
August 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM #722828evolusdParticipantQuote:
“The new FASB rules could help boost banks’ earnings by making it clear that institutions can account for mortgage-backed securities and other assets based on their internal estimates of cash flow and other factors, rather than relying on sales prices in largely inactive markets.”
This seems to address accounting for MBS – I’m inquiring about the loans that Banks hold directly in their portfolio. When a Borrower stops paying, the Bank has to address that change in some way on their balance sheet, typically through an increased reserve. They can’t PV the income stream because there isn’t one anymore, so you’d think they’d have to take into consideration their collateral value and reserve accordingly.
August 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM #722947SK in CVParticipantThe incentive to hold off so long on foreclosures theoretically has nothing to do with recognizing losses. Losses must be recognized when there is evidence of impairment. Though possibly sooner, such impairment must be evaluated if a loan is 90 days delinquent. Whether loans have to be individually evaluated depends on the relationship between the size of the loan and the size of the bank. Giant banks may not be required to individually evaluate most home mortgages. Smaller banks probably will. The larger banks can evaluate similar assets as a whole. But whether those loans must be evaluated individually or as a group, they must be re-evaluated at every balance sheet date, and appropriate loan loss reserves must be made. Foreclosure should finalized the loan loss evaluation process, because at foreclosure the impaired asset changes from a loan to REO. The REO must also be evaluated at each balance sheet date, and any additional impairment must be recognized. (It just changes from a loan loss to an REO loss.)
August 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM #724054SK in CVParticipantThe incentive to hold off so long on foreclosures theoretically has nothing to do with recognizing losses. Losses must be recognized when there is evidence of impairment. Though possibly sooner, such impairment must be evaluated if a loan is 90 days delinquent. Whether loans have to be individually evaluated depends on the relationship between the size of the loan and the size of the bank. Giant banks may not be required to individually evaluate most home mortgages. Smaller banks probably will. The larger banks can evaluate similar assets as a whole. But whether those loans must be evaluated individually or as a group, they must be re-evaluated at every balance sheet date, and appropriate loan loss reserves must be made. Foreclosure should finalized the loan loss evaluation process, because at foreclosure the impaired asset changes from a loan to REO. The REO must also be evaluated at each balance sheet date, and any additional impairment must be recognized. (It just changes from a loan loss to an REO loss.)
August 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM #723540SK in CVParticipantThe incentive to hold off so long on foreclosures theoretically has nothing to do with recognizing losses. Losses must be recognized when there is evidence of impairment. Though possibly sooner, such impairment must be evaluated if a loan is 90 days delinquent. Whether loans have to be individually evaluated depends on the relationship between the size of the loan and the size of the bank. Giant banks may not be required to individually evaluate most home mortgages. Smaller banks probably will. The larger banks can evaluate similar assets as a whole. But whether those loans must be evaluated individually or as a group, they must be re-evaluated at every balance sheet date, and appropriate loan loss reserves must be made. Foreclosure should finalized the loan loss evaluation process, because at foreclosure the impaired asset changes from a loan to REO. The REO must also be evaluated at each balance sheet date, and any additional impairment must be recognized. (It just changes from a loan loss to an REO loss.)
August 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM #723694SK in CVParticipantThe incentive to hold off so long on foreclosures theoretically has nothing to do with recognizing losses. Losses must be recognized when there is evidence of impairment. Though possibly sooner, such impairment must be evaluated if a loan is 90 days delinquent. Whether loans have to be individually evaluated depends on the relationship between the size of the loan and the size of the bank. Giant banks may not be required to individually evaluate most home mortgages. Smaller banks probably will. The larger banks can evaluate similar assets as a whole. But whether those loans must be evaluated individually or as a group, they must be re-evaluated at every balance sheet date, and appropriate loan loss reserves must be made. Foreclosure should finalized the loan loss evaluation process, because at foreclosure the impaired asset changes from a loan to REO. The REO must also be evaluated at each balance sheet date, and any additional impairment must be recognized. (It just changes from a loan loss to an REO loss.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.