Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › HOUSING: Feds suspend anti-flipping rule
- This topic has 300 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 18, 2010 at 8:22 AM #504011January 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM #503149UCGalParticipant
[quote=CA renter]When I refer to the ~40% being investors, I’m including the off-market stuff like bulk sales, bulk MBS purchases, etc… in addition to flippers, landlords, second-home “investors,” etc. Hundreds of billions of dollars (trillions???) are being transacted that we are not privy to. What we see on the MLS is likely a very small portion of what’s really going on, IMHO.
[/quote]Why are landlords who buy a property, hold it, rent it out, pay the mortgage, insurance, maintenance, etc in the same category as bulk sale buyers and flippers?
Disclaimer – I’m considering getting into the landlord business if I can find a deal that pencils. And I’d pay cash at the steps if it would get me a better deal. I’d be stupid not to consider trustee sales as a way of reducing my investment hit.
January 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM #503296UCGalParticipant[quote=CA renter]When I refer to the ~40% being investors, I’m including the off-market stuff like bulk sales, bulk MBS purchases, etc… in addition to flippers, landlords, second-home “investors,” etc. Hundreds of billions of dollars (trillions???) are being transacted that we are not privy to. What we see on the MLS is likely a very small portion of what’s really going on, IMHO.
[/quote]Why are landlords who buy a property, hold it, rent it out, pay the mortgage, insurance, maintenance, etc in the same category as bulk sale buyers and flippers?
Disclaimer – I’m considering getting into the landlord business if I can find a deal that pencils. And I’d pay cash at the steps if it would get me a better deal. I’d be stupid not to consider trustee sales as a way of reducing my investment hit.
January 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM #503695UCGalParticipant[quote=CA renter]When I refer to the ~40% being investors, I’m including the off-market stuff like bulk sales, bulk MBS purchases, etc… in addition to flippers, landlords, second-home “investors,” etc. Hundreds of billions of dollars (trillions???) are being transacted that we are not privy to. What we see on the MLS is likely a very small portion of what’s really going on, IMHO.
[/quote]Why are landlords who buy a property, hold it, rent it out, pay the mortgage, insurance, maintenance, etc in the same category as bulk sale buyers and flippers?
Disclaimer – I’m considering getting into the landlord business if I can find a deal that pencils. And I’d pay cash at the steps if it would get me a better deal. I’d be stupid not to consider trustee sales as a way of reducing my investment hit.
January 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM #503788UCGalParticipant[quote=CA renter]When I refer to the ~40% being investors, I’m including the off-market stuff like bulk sales, bulk MBS purchases, etc… in addition to flippers, landlords, second-home “investors,” etc. Hundreds of billions of dollars (trillions???) are being transacted that we are not privy to. What we see on the MLS is likely a very small portion of what’s really going on, IMHO.
[/quote]Why are landlords who buy a property, hold it, rent it out, pay the mortgage, insurance, maintenance, etc in the same category as bulk sale buyers and flippers?
Disclaimer – I’m considering getting into the landlord business if I can find a deal that pencils. And I’d pay cash at the steps if it would get me a better deal. I’d be stupid not to consider trustee sales as a way of reducing my investment hit.
January 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM #504035UCGalParticipant[quote=CA renter]When I refer to the ~40% being investors, I’m including the off-market stuff like bulk sales, bulk MBS purchases, etc… in addition to flippers, landlords, second-home “investors,” etc. Hundreds of billions of dollars (trillions???) are being transacted that we are not privy to. What we see on the MLS is likely a very small portion of what’s really going on, IMHO.
[/quote]Why are landlords who buy a property, hold it, rent it out, pay the mortgage, insurance, maintenance, etc in the same category as bulk sale buyers and flippers?
Disclaimer – I’m considering getting into the landlord business if I can find a deal that pencils. And I’d pay cash at the steps if it would get me a better deal. I’d be stupid not to consider trustee sales as a way of reducing my investment hit.
January 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM #503154garysearsParticipant“The banks should be forced by the FDIC and other govt regulators to take these properties back and they should then be forced to auction them off on a national site (with a minimum 30-day marketing time) where online bidders are pre-qualified through the GSEs and every transaction can be tracked.”
It occurred to me one day a few weeks ago that Ebay would be a much better way of selling properties than the current system. It is just unbelievable to me that bids offered on properties are not public knowledge. If I am interested in a property I should immediately be able to see what offers have already been made so I can judge whether it is worth my time.
This monopoly on RE information has got to end. The only “fair” part of the current system is the Trustee Sale. After that, all bets are off, and the game begins. A game of deceit and misinformation that I’d rather not play.
January 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM #503301garysearsParticipant“The banks should be forced by the FDIC and other govt regulators to take these properties back and they should then be forced to auction them off on a national site (with a minimum 30-day marketing time) where online bidders are pre-qualified through the GSEs and every transaction can be tracked.”
It occurred to me one day a few weeks ago that Ebay would be a much better way of selling properties than the current system. It is just unbelievable to me that bids offered on properties are not public knowledge. If I am interested in a property I should immediately be able to see what offers have already been made so I can judge whether it is worth my time.
This monopoly on RE information has got to end. The only “fair” part of the current system is the Trustee Sale. After that, all bets are off, and the game begins. A game of deceit and misinformation that I’d rather not play.
January 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM #503700garysearsParticipant“The banks should be forced by the FDIC and other govt regulators to take these properties back and they should then be forced to auction them off on a national site (with a minimum 30-day marketing time) where online bidders are pre-qualified through the GSEs and every transaction can be tracked.”
It occurred to me one day a few weeks ago that Ebay would be a much better way of selling properties than the current system. It is just unbelievable to me that bids offered on properties are not public knowledge. If I am interested in a property I should immediately be able to see what offers have already been made so I can judge whether it is worth my time.
This monopoly on RE information has got to end. The only “fair” part of the current system is the Trustee Sale. After that, all bets are off, and the game begins. A game of deceit and misinformation that I’d rather not play.
January 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM #503793garysearsParticipant“The banks should be forced by the FDIC and other govt regulators to take these properties back and they should then be forced to auction them off on a national site (with a minimum 30-day marketing time) where online bidders are pre-qualified through the GSEs and every transaction can be tracked.”
It occurred to me one day a few weeks ago that Ebay would be a much better way of selling properties than the current system. It is just unbelievable to me that bids offered on properties are not public knowledge. If I am interested in a property I should immediately be able to see what offers have already been made so I can judge whether it is worth my time.
This monopoly on RE information has got to end. The only “fair” part of the current system is the Trustee Sale. After that, all bets are off, and the game begins. A game of deceit and misinformation that I’d rather not play.
January 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM #504040garysearsParticipant“The banks should be forced by the FDIC and other govt regulators to take these properties back and they should then be forced to auction them off on a national site (with a minimum 30-day marketing time) where online bidders are pre-qualified through the GSEs and every transaction can be tracked.”
It occurred to me one day a few weeks ago that Ebay would be a much better way of selling properties than the current system. It is just unbelievable to me that bids offered on properties are not public knowledge. If I am interested in a property I should immediately be able to see what offers have already been made so I can judge whether it is worth my time.
This monopoly on RE information has got to end. The only “fair” part of the current system is the Trustee Sale. After that, all bets are off, and the game begins. A game of deceit and misinformation that I’d rather not play.
January 18, 2010 at 11:49 AM #503159SD RealtorParticipantThat is the thing. Nobody has to play. Go find a hard money lender and buy the home from trustee sale. Buy the home and refinance it 6 months down the road.
January 18, 2010 at 11:49 AM #503306SD RealtorParticipantThat is the thing. Nobody has to play. Go find a hard money lender and buy the home from trustee sale. Buy the home and refinance it 6 months down the road.
January 18, 2010 at 11:49 AM #503705SD RealtorParticipantThat is the thing. Nobody has to play. Go find a hard money lender and buy the home from trustee sale. Buy the home and refinance it 6 months down the road.
January 18, 2010 at 11:49 AM #503798SD RealtorParticipantThat is the thing. Nobody has to play. Go find a hard money lender and buy the home from trustee sale. Buy the home and refinance it 6 months down the road.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.