- This topic has 170 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 21, 2010 at 12:44 PM #516984February 21, 2010 at 1:12 PM #516078HobieParticipant
Twisterfilms is from England. It would make a good story comparing the views from abroad. How did their financial papers discuss/predict our RE bubble compared to ours. Should be an interesting piece… if the PBS editors leave him alone.
February 21, 2010 at 1:12 PM #516221HobieParticipantTwisterfilms is from England. It would make a good story comparing the views from abroad. How did their financial papers discuss/predict our RE bubble compared to ours. Should be an interesting piece… if the PBS editors leave him alone.
February 21, 2010 at 1:12 PM #516650HobieParticipantTwisterfilms is from England. It would make a good story comparing the views from abroad. How did their financial papers discuss/predict our RE bubble compared to ours. Should be an interesting piece… if the PBS editors leave him alone.
February 21, 2010 at 1:12 PM #516742HobieParticipantTwisterfilms is from England. It would make a good story comparing the views from abroad. How did their financial papers discuss/predict our RE bubble compared to ours. Should be an interesting piece… if the PBS editors leave him alone.
February 21, 2010 at 1:12 PM #516994HobieParticipantTwisterfilms is from England. It would make a good story comparing the views from abroad. How did their financial papers discuss/predict our RE bubble compared to ours. Should be an interesting piece… if the PBS editors leave him alone.
February 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM #516103Matt SFParticipant@ temeculaguy
Yeah, I’d say you’re dead on. I’ve been saying for a while that we’re looking at a potential gold bubble due the rampant speculation in the basic commodity and the several gold ETFs that have sprung up of late (7 at last count I think), and all the cheesy ads pumping gold as the next sure thing.
Retail investors are usually the last to get in on the bubble since they’re usually the least informed and fall for the worst ads possible, so I’d say using your friends as an observational metric is justifiable. For example, think back to all those Countrywide and DiTech ads for home equity loans and liar loans back in 2000 to 2006.
But what I find disturbing are the ads that pump gold just like they did real estate back in the mid 2000s. Phrases like “X can’t go down in value”, where they once said this for real estate because “we all know real estate never depreciates”. Yeah, right!
But I certainly won’t deny that gold proponents have a strong case. I still think the US Dollar has some problems and will continue to depreciate maybe a little faster than it has in the past, but I think gold may have ran too far to fast due to speculators and momentum investors.
So as a long term investor, and most gold investors like to think of themselves as buy & hold investors, I think the big question you have to ask yourself is do you really want to buy something that’s tripled in price over the last 5 years or buy something else that’s fallen 50% of more?
Also, I wrote a post a few months ago saying “10 reasons you shouldn’t invest in gold” and man, did I get slammed! The gold bugs teed off on me bigtime!
February 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM #516246Matt SFParticipant@ temeculaguy
Yeah, I’d say you’re dead on. I’ve been saying for a while that we’re looking at a potential gold bubble due the rampant speculation in the basic commodity and the several gold ETFs that have sprung up of late (7 at last count I think), and all the cheesy ads pumping gold as the next sure thing.
Retail investors are usually the last to get in on the bubble since they’re usually the least informed and fall for the worst ads possible, so I’d say using your friends as an observational metric is justifiable. For example, think back to all those Countrywide and DiTech ads for home equity loans and liar loans back in 2000 to 2006.
But what I find disturbing are the ads that pump gold just like they did real estate back in the mid 2000s. Phrases like “X can’t go down in value”, where they once said this for real estate because “we all know real estate never depreciates”. Yeah, right!
But I certainly won’t deny that gold proponents have a strong case. I still think the US Dollar has some problems and will continue to depreciate maybe a little faster than it has in the past, but I think gold may have ran too far to fast due to speculators and momentum investors.
So as a long term investor, and most gold investors like to think of themselves as buy & hold investors, I think the big question you have to ask yourself is do you really want to buy something that’s tripled in price over the last 5 years or buy something else that’s fallen 50% of more?
Also, I wrote a post a few months ago saying “10 reasons you shouldn’t invest in gold” and man, did I get slammed! The gold bugs teed off on me bigtime!
February 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM #516675Matt SFParticipant@ temeculaguy
Yeah, I’d say you’re dead on. I’ve been saying for a while that we’re looking at a potential gold bubble due the rampant speculation in the basic commodity and the several gold ETFs that have sprung up of late (7 at last count I think), and all the cheesy ads pumping gold as the next sure thing.
Retail investors are usually the last to get in on the bubble since they’re usually the least informed and fall for the worst ads possible, so I’d say using your friends as an observational metric is justifiable. For example, think back to all those Countrywide and DiTech ads for home equity loans and liar loans back in 2000 to 2006.
But what I find disturbing are the ads that pump gold just like they did real estate back in the mid 2000s. Phrases like “X can’t go down in value”, where they once said this for real estate because “we all know real estate never depreciates”. Yeah, right!
But I certainly won’t deny that gold proponents have a strong case. I still think the US Dollar has some problems and will continue to depreciate maybe a little faster than it has in the past, but I think gold may have ran too far to fast due to speculators and momentum investors.
So as a long term investor, and most gold investors like to think of themselves as buy & hold investors, I think the big question you have to ask yourself is do you really want to buy something that’s tripled in price over the last 5 years or buy something else that’s fallen 50% of more?
Also, I wrote a post a few months ago saying “10 reasons you shouldn’t invest in gold” and man, did I get slammed! The gold bugs teed off on me bigtime!
February 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM #516767Matt SFParticipant@ temeculaguy
Yeah, I’d say you’re dead on. I’ve been saying for a while that we’re looking at a potential gold bubble due the rampant speculation in the basic commodity and the several gold ETFs that have sprung up of late (7 at last count I think), and all the cheesy ads pumping gold as the next sure thing.
Retail investors are usually the last to get in on the bubble since they’re usually the least informed and fall for the worst ads possible, so I’d say using your friends as an observational metric is justifiable. For example, think back to all those Countrywide and DiTech ads for home equity loans and liar loans back in 2000 to 2006.
But what I find disturbing are the ads that pump gold just like they did real estate back in the mid 2000s. Phrases like “X can’t go down in value”, where they once said this for real estate because “we all know real estate never depreciates”. Yeah, right!
But I certainly won’t deny that gold proponents have a strong case. I still think the US Dollar has some problems and will continue to depreciate maybe a little faster than it has in the past, but I think gold may have ran too far to fast due to speculators and momentum investors.
So as a long term investor, and most gold investors like to think of themselves as buy & hold investors, I think the big question you have to ask yourself is do you really want to buy something that’s tripled in price over the last 5 years or buy something else that’s fallen 50% of more?
Also, I wrote a post a few months ago saying “10 reasons you shouldn’t invest in gold” and man, did I get slammed! The gold bugs teed off on me bigtime!
February 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM #517019Matt SFParticipant@ temeculaguy
Yeah, I’d say you’re dead on. I’ve been saying for a while that we’re looking at a potential gold bubble due the rampant speculation in the basic commodity and the several gold ETFs that have sprung up of late (7 at last count I think), and all the cheesy ads pumping gold as the next sure thing.
Retail investors are usually the last to get in on the bubble since they’re usually the least informed and fall for the worst ads possible, so I’d say using your friends as an observational metric is justifiable. For example, think back to all those Countrywide and DiTech ads for home equity loans and liar loans back in 2000 to 2006.
But what I find disturbing are the ads that pump gold just like they did real estate back in the mid 2000s. Phrases like “X can’t go down in value”, where they once said this for real estate because “we all know real estate never depreciates”. Yeah, right!
But I certainly won’t deny that gold proponents have a strong case. I still think the US Dollar has some problems and will continue to depreciate maybe a little faster than it has in the past, but I think gold may have ran too far to fast due to speculators and momentum investors.
So as a long term investor, and most gold investors like to think of themselves as buy & hold investors, I think the big question you have to ask yourself is do you really want to buy something that’s tripled in price over the last 5 years or buy something else that’s fallen 50% of more?
Also, I wrote a post a few months ago saying “10 reasons you shouldn’t invest in gold” and man, did I get slammed! The gold bugs teed off on me bigtime!
February 21, 2010 at 1:36 PM #516108sdduuuudeParticipanttwisterfilms,
It may be interesting to compare those who got caught up in the bubble to those who didn’t. Compare those who saw this coming to those who got caught up in the mood.
February 21, 2010 at 1:36 PM #516251sdduuuudeParticipanttwisterfilms,
It may be interesting to compare those who got caught up in the bubble to those who didn’t. Compare those who saw this coming to those who got caught up in the mood.
February 21, 2010 at 1:36 PM #516680sdduuuudeParticipanttwisterfilms,
It may be interesting to compare those who got caught up in the bubble to those who didn’t. Compare those who saw this coming to those who got caught up in the mood.
February 21, 2010 at 1:36 PM #516772sdduuuudeParticipanttwisterfilms,
It may be interesting to compare those who got caught up in the bubble to those who didn’t. Compare those who saw this coming to those who got caught up in the mood.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.