- This topic has 520 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM #481683November 11, 2009 at 6:32 PM #480933ucodegenParticipant
Since you’ve already asked your dad’s nursing home, what’s their patient to RN ratio?
It was 6 to 8.. (day was probably 6, night was 8). It was a more ‘critical care’ nursing home. I didn’t make sure that I was clear on ‘RN’ vs ‘LVN’ on the question. I also know they had a staffed pharmacy with pharmacologist and pharm tech as well as staff doctors.. no surgeons though.
Scripps has always been a non-profit organization, since its first inception many many years ago. I wonder what’s the # for VA hospital. That might tell you what’s the real market rate. profit vs non-profit vs VA.
That would be interesting.. I used to work at a VA hospital, but not in that category. I was working as an engineer with R&D people in anaesthesiology.
I assume family doctors get paid a lot less then surgeons too.
That is my impression, but these charges are generally not billed as the ‘room’..
November 11, 2009 at 6:32 PM #481101ucodegenParticipantSince you’ve already asked your dad’s nursing home, what’s their patient to RN ratio?
It was 6 to 8.. (day was probably 6, night was 8). It was a more ‘critical care’ nursing home. I didn’t make sure that I was clear on ‘RN’ vs ‘LVN’ on the question. I also know they had a staffed pharmacy with pharmacologist and pharm tech as well as staff doctors.. no surgeons though.
Scripps has always been a non-profit organization, since its first inception many many years ago. I wonder what’s the # for VA hospital. That might tell you what’s the real market rate. profit vs non-profit vs VA.
That would be interesting.. I used to work at a VA hospital, but not in that category. I was working as an engineer with R&D people in anaesthesiology.
I assume family doctors get paid a lot less then surgeons too.
That is my impression, but these charges are generally not billed as the ‘room’..
November 11, 2009 at 6:32 PM #481467ucodegenParticipantSince you’ve already asked your dad’s nursing home, what’s their patient to RN ratio?
It was 6 to 8.. (day was probably 6, night was 8). It was a more ‘critical care’ nursing home. I didn’t make sure that I was clear on ‘RN’ vs ‘LVN’ on the question. I also know they had a staffed pharmacy with pharmacologist and pharm tech as well as staff doctors.. no surgeons though.
Scripps has always been a non-profit organization, since its first inception many many years ago. I wonder what’s the # for VA hospital. That might tell you what’s the real market rate. profit vs non-profit vs VA.
That would be interesting.. I used to work at a VA hospital, but not in that category. I was working as an engineer with R&D people in anaesthesiology.
I assume family doctors get paid a lot less then surgeons too.
That is my impression, but these charges are generally not billed as the ‘room’..
November 11, 2009 at 6:32 PM #481546ucodegenParticipantSince you’ve already asked your dad’s nursing home, what’s their patient to RN ratio?
It was 6 to 8.. (day was probably 6, night was 8). It was a more ‘critical care’ nursing home. I didn’t make sure that I was clear on ‘RN’ vs ‘LVN’ on the question. I also know they had a staffed pharmacy with pharmacologist and pharm tech as well as staff doctors.. no surgeons though.
Scripps has always been a non-profit organization, since its first inception many many years ago. I wonder what’s the # for VA hospital. That might tell you what’s the real market rate. profit vs non-profit vs VA.
That would be interesting.. I used to work at a VA hospital, but not in that category. I was working as an engineer with R&D people in anaesthesiology.
I assume family doctors get paid a lot less then surgeons too.
That is my impression, but these charges are generally not billed as the ‘room’..
November 11, 2009 at 6:32 PM #481767ucodegenParticipantSince you’ve already asked your dad’s nursing home, what’s their patient to RN ratio?
It was 6 to 8.. (day was probably 6, night was 8). It was a more ‘critical care’ nursing home. I didn’t make sure that I was clear on ‘RN’ vs ‘LVN’ on the question. I also know they had a staffed pharmacy with pharmacologist and pharm tech as well as staff doctors.. no surgeons though.
Scripps has always been a non-profit organization, since its first inception many many years ago. I wonder what’s the # for VA hospital. That might tell you what’s the real market rate. profit vs non-profit vs VA.
That would be interesting.. I used to work at a VA hospital, but not in that category. I was working as an engineer with R&D people in anaesthesiology.
I assume family doctors get paid a lot less then surgeons too.
That is my impression, but these charges are generally not billed as the ‘room’..
November 11, 2009 at 7:56 PM #480991sd_mattParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
I still think it would be better to fire Congress and then start with subtle changes to the current system like allowing interstate competition and getting rid of the anti-trust exemption.
I think the best way is a progressive series of legislations.. This way you don’t make a big, hard to correct mistake.
1) remove anti-trust exemption
2) allow interstate competition
3) allow people to carry their insurance after job loss at their current payout rate(from the same provider) – but they also have to pay the company contrib part after the job loss.
4) Treat health savings accounts like a 401K.. unspent money can be rolled over to the next year.
5) Insurer can’t cancel a policy once a person has a systemic illness while covered. All of the payments the person made up to then was to cover such an event.
… just a start.[/quote]Yup
This or some variation. And any additional changes done over time.
November 11, 2009 at 7:56 PM #481158sd_mattParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
I still think it would be better to fire Congress and then start with subtle changes to the current system like allowing interstate competition and getting rid of the anti-trust exemption.
I think the best way is a progressive series of legislations.. This way you don’t make a big, hard to correct mistake.
1) remove anti-trust exemption
2) allow interstate competition
3) allow people to carry their insurance after job loss at their current payout rate(from the same provider) – but they also have to pay the company contrib part after the job loss.
4) Treat health savings accounts like a 401K.. unspent money can be rolled over to the next year.
5) Insurer can’t cancel a policy once a person has a systemic illness while covered. All of the payments the person made up to then was to cover such an event.
… just a start.[/quote]Yup
This or some variation. And any additional changes done over time.
November 11, 2009 at 7:56 PM #481526sd_mattParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
I still think it would be better to fire Congress and then start with subtle changes to the current system like allowing interstate competition and getting rid of the anti-trust exemption.
I think the best way is a progressive series of legislations.. This way you don’t make a big, hard to correct mistake.
1) remove anti-trust exemption
2) allow interstate competition
3) allow people to carry their insurance after job loss at their current payout rate(from the same provider) – but they also have to pay the company contrib part after the job loss.
4) Treat health savings accounts like a 401K.. unspent money can be rolled over to the next year.
5) Insurer can’t cancel a policy once a person has a systemic illness while covered. All of the payments the person made up to then was to cover such an event.
… just a start.[/quote]Yup
This or some variation. And any additional changes done over time.
November 11, 2009 at 7:56 PM #481604sd_mattParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
I still think it would be better to fire Congress and then start with subtle changes to the current system like allowing interstate competition and getting rid of the anti-trust exemption.
I think the best way is a progressive series of legislations.. This way you don’t make a big, hard to correct mistake.
1) remove anti-trust exemption
2) allow interstate competition
3) allow people to carry their insurance after job loss at their current payout rate(from the same provider) – but they also have to pay the company contrib part after the job loss.
4) Treat health savings accounts like a 401K.. unspent money can be rolled over to the next year.
5) Insurer can’t cancel a policy once a person has a systemic illness while covered. All of the payments the person made up to then was to cover such an event.
… just a start.[/quote]Yup
This or some variation. And any additional changes done over time.
November 11, 2009 at 7:56 PM #481827sd_mattParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
I still think it would be better to fire Congress and then start with subtle changes to the current system like allowing interstate competition and getting rid of the anti-trust exemption.
I think the best way is a progressive series of legislations.. This way you don’t make a big, hard to correct mistake.
1) remove anti-trust exemption
2) allow interstate competition
3) allow people to carry their insurance after job loss at their current payout rate(from the same provider) – but they also have to pay the company contrib part after the job loss.
4) Treat health savings accounts like a 401K.. unspent money can be rolled over to the next year.
5) Insurer can’t cancel a policy once a person has a systemic illness while covered. All of the payments the person made up to then was to cover such an event.
… just a start.[/quote]Yup
This or some variation. And any additional changes done over time.
November 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM #481298dbapigParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
Since 1974, Hawaii has required all employers to provide relatively generous health care benefits to any employee who works 20 hours a week or more. If health care legislation passes in Congress, the rest of the country may barely catch up.
And Hawaii has almost no high paying businesses other than the military base. It also has a disproportionate number of people living at or below the poverty line. No businesses want to locate there because of all the mandated social costs. My S.O. lived in Hawaii.. she is paid much better on the mainland than she was in Hawaii and she mentioned that jobs are much more plentiful here. Many Hawaiians are relocating to the mainland because of the jobs situation in Hawaii.[/quote]
So by your logic the businesses will leave USA if they are required to insure more employees? Where will they go? Especially the high paying businesses, the ones who can afford to pay for more health insurance coverage?
I disagree businesses are moving out of Hawaii mainly due to the health insurance issue. The bigger reason is that it’s more pensive there because of the distance from the mainland.
November 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM #481468dbapigParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
Since 1974, Hawaii has required all employers to provide relatively generous health care benefits to any employee who works 20 hours a week or more. If health care legislation passes in Congress, the rest of the country may barely catch up.
And Hawaii has almost no high paying businesses other than the military base. It also has a disproportionate number of people living at or below the poverty line. No businesses want to locate there because of all the mandated social costs. My S.O. lived in Hawaii.. she is paid much better on the mainland than she was in Hawaii and she mentioned that jobs are much more plentiful here. Many Hawaiians are relocating to the mainland because of the jobs situation in Hawaii.[/quote]
So by your logic the businesses will leave USA if they are required to insure more employees? Where will they go? Especially the high paying businesses, the ones who can afford to pay for more health insurance coverage?
I disagree businesses are moving out of Hawaii mainly due to the health insurance issue. The bigger reason is that it’s more pensive there because of the distance from the mainland.
November 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM #481833dbapigParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
Since 1974, Hawaii has required all employers to provide relatively generous health care benefits to any employee who works 20 hours a week or more. If health care legislation passes in Congress, the rest of the country may barely catch up.
And Hawaii has almost no high paying businesses other than the military base. It also has a disproportionate number of people living at or below the poverty line. No businesses want to locate there because of all the mandated social costs. My S.O. lived in Hawaii.. she is paid much better on the mainland than she was in Hawaii and she mentioned that jobs are much more plentiful here. Many Hawaiians are relocating to the mainland because of the jobs situation in Hawaii.[/quote]
So by your logic the businesses will leave USA if they are required to insure more employees? Where will they go? Especially the high paying businesses, the ones who can afford to pay for more health insurance coverage?
I disagree businesses are moving out of Hawaii mainly due to the health insurance issue. The bigger reason is that it’s more pensive there because of the distance from the mainland.
November 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM #481911dbapigParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
Since 1974, Hawaii has required all employers to provide relatively generous health care benefits to any employee who works 20 hours a week or more. If health care legislation passes in Congress, the rest of the country may barely catch up.
And Hawaii has almost no high paying businesses other than the military base. It also has a disproportionate number of people living at or below the poverty line. No businesses want to locate there because of all the mandated social costs. My S.O. lived in Hawaii.. she is paid much better on the mainland than she was in Hawaii and she mentioned that jobs are much more plentiful here. Many Hawaiians are relocating to the mainland because of the jobs situation in Hawaii.[/quote]
So by your logic the businesses will leave USA if they are required to insure more employees? Where will they go? Especially the high paying businesses, the ones who can afford to pay for more health insurance coverage?
I disagree businesses are moving out of Hawaii mainly due to the health insurance issue. The bigger reason is that it’s more pensive there because of the distance from the mainland.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.