- This topic has 290 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
barnaby33.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 24, 2010 at 7:04 PM #596670August 24, 2010 at 7:17 PM #595621
briansd1
Guest[quote=andymajumder][quote=Scarlett]I’d be happy with a 2002 nominal pricing for Rancho Penasquitos…[/quote]
That may be possible quite soon. Actually even now if you negotiate hard you can get early 2003 nominal price…and than factor in that interest rates are about 2% lower now than early 2003, you are probably getting early to mid 2002 prices. You do have to take the cost of financing into account.[/quote]
Since real estate is all about monthly payments, maybe we should look at monthly nominal mortgage payments.
OK, I’ll shoot for that theoretical Year-2000 nominal mortgage payment. 😉
August 24, 2010 at 7:17 PM #595714briansd1
Guest[quote=andymajumder][quote=Scarlett]I’d be happy with a 2002 nominal pricing for Rancho Penasquitos…[/quote]
That may be possible quite soon. Actually even now if you negotiate hard you can get early 2003 nominal price…and than factor in that interest rates are about 2% lower now than early 2003, you are probably getting early to mid 2002 prices. You do have to take the cost of financing into account.[/quote]
Since real estate is all about monthly payments, maybe we should look at monthly nominal mortgage payments.
OK, I’ll shoot for that theoretical Year-2000 nominal mortgage payment. 😉
August 24, 2010 at 7:17 PM #596253briansd1
Guest[quote=andymajumder][quote=Scarlett]I’d be happy with a 2002 nominal pricing for Rancho Penasquitos…[/quote]
That may be possible quite soon. Actually even now if you negotiate hard you can get early 2003 nominal price…and than factor in that interest rates are about 2% lower now than early 2003, you are probably getting early to mid 2002 prices. You do have to take the cost of financing into account.[/quote]
Since real estate is all about monthly payments, maybe we should look at monthly nominal mortgage payments.
OK, I’ll shoot for that theoretical Year-2000 nominal mortgage payment. 😉
August 24, 2010 at 7:17 PM #596362briansd1
Guest[quote=andymajumder][quote=Scarlett]I’d be happy with a 2002 nominal pricing for Rancho Penasquitos…[/quote]
That may be possible quite soon. Actually even now if you negotiate hard you can get early 2003 nominal price…and than factor in that interest rates are about 2% lower now than early 2003, you are probably getting early to mid 2002 prices. You do have to take the cost of financing into account.[/quote]
Since real estate is all about monthly payments, maybe we should look at monthly nominal mortgage payments.
OK, I’ll shoot for that theoretical Year-2000 nominal mortgage payment. 😉
August 24, 2010 at 7:17 PM #596675briansd1
Guest[quote=andymajumder][quote=Scarlett]I’d be happy with a 2002 nominal pricing for Rancho Penasquitos…[/quote]
That may be possible quite soon. Actually even now if you negotiate hard you can get early 2003 nominal price…and than factor in that interest rates are about 2% lower now than early 2003, you are probably getting early to mid 2002 prices. You do have to take the cost of financing into account.[/quote]
Since real estate is all about monthly payments, maybe we should look at monthly nominal mortgage payments.
OK, I’ll shoot for that theoretical Year-2000 nominal mortgage payment. 😉
August 24, 2010 at 7:50 PM #595636sdrealtor
ParticipantYou may be there already.
August 24, 2010 at 7:50 PM #595729sdrealtor
ParticipantYou may be there already.
August 24, 2010 at 7:50 PM #596268sdrealtor
ParticipantYou may be there already.
August 24, 2010 at 7:50 PM #596377sdrealtor
ParticipantYou may be there already.
August 24, 2010 at 7:50 PM #596690sdrealtor
ParticipantYou may be there already.
August 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM #595681all
Participant[quote=briansd1]I wonder how many tax credit recipients will walk if we get the double dip.
[/quote]JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.
August 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM #595774all
Participant[quote=briansd1]I wonder how many tax credit recipients will walk if we get the double dip.
[/quote]JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.
August 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM #596313all
Participant[quote=briansd1]I wonder how many tax credit recipients will walk if we get the double dip.
[/quote]JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.
August 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM #596422all
Participant[quote=briansd1]I wonder how many tax credit recipients will walk if we get the double dip.
[/quote]JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.