- This topic has 290 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
barnaby33.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 27, 2010 at 5:41 AM #597924August 27, 2010 at 6:47 AM #596865
investor
Participantnor-la-sd-guy. I like your posts but I don’t feel confident in things turning for the better next spring. Too many homes that should be in foreclosure aren’t, too many commercial loans going bad. I would feel more confident in your estimation if the foreclosure process was allowed to go its natural course, get through the bad loans and then come out the other side having gone through the worst of it. I agree with the football analogy guys above that too much reinflating of the bubble has been done, trying to get the market back up artificially to avoid the bottom but all they have done is to postpone the enivatable and possibly make it worse.
August 27, 2010 at 6:47 AM #596959investor
Participantnor-la-sd-guy. I like your posts but I don’t feel confident in things turning for the better next spring. Too many homes that should be in foreclosure aren’t, too many commercial loans going bad. I would feel more confident in your estimation if the foreclosure process was allowed to go its natural course, get through the bad loans and then come out the other side having gone through the worst of it. I agree with the football analogy guys above that too much reinflating of the bubble has been done, trying to get the market back up artificially to avoid the bottom but all they have done is to postpone the enivatable and possibly make it worse.
August 27, 2010 at 6:47 AM #597504investor
Participantnor-la-sd-guy. I like your posts but I don’t feel confident in things turning for the better next spring. Too many homes that should be in foreclosure aren’t, too many commercial loans going bad. I would feel more confident in your estimation if the foreclosure process was allowed to go its natural course, get through the bad loans and then come out the other side having gone through the worst of it. I agree with the football analogy guys above that too much reinflating of the bubble has been done, trying to get the market back up artificially to avoid the bottom but all they have done is to postpone the enivatable and possibly make it worse.
August 27, 2010 at 6:47 AM #597611investor
Participantnor-la-sd-guy. I like your posts but I don’t feel confident in things turning for the better next spring. Too many homes that should be in foreclosure aren’t, too many commercial loans going bad. I would feel more confident in your estimation if the foreclosure process was allowed to go its natural course, get through the bad loans and then come out the other side having gone through the worst of it. I agree with the football analogy guys above that too much reinflating of the bubble has been done, trying to get the market back up artificially to avoid the bottom but all they have done is to postpone the enivatable and possibly make it worse.
August 27, 2010 at 6:47 AM #597929investor
Participantnor-la-sd-guy. I like your posts but I don’t feel confident in things turning for the better next spring. Too many homes that should be in foreclosure aren’t, too many commercial loans going bad. I would feel more confident in your estimation if the foreclosure process was allowed to go its natural course, get through the bad loans and then come out the other side having gone through the worst of it. I agree with the football analogy guys above that too much reinflating of the bubble has been done, trying to get the market back up artificially to avoid the bottom but all they have done is to postpone the enivatable and possibly make it worse.
August 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM #597030jpinpb
Participant[quote=captcha]
JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.[/quote]6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.
August 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM #597124jpinpb
Participant[quote=captcha]
JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.[/quote]6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.
August 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM #597669jpinpb
Participant[quote=captcha]
JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.[/quote]6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.
August 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM #597778jpinpb
Participant[quote=captcha]
JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.[/quote]6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.
August 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM #598098jpinpb
Participant[quote=captcha]
JTR says 90% of those who bought in 92130 since 06/01 put 20% or more down. I don’t remember the credit era numbers, but it was not much different. The prices would need to drop a lot for those to walk.[/quote]6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.
August 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM #597040zk
Participant[quote=jpinpb]
6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.[/quote]
While technically in the CV zip code, that end of CV goes to PQ schools, and is not generally considered as desireable as the rest of CV.
The damage does seem to be moving closer, though.
August 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM #597134zk
Participant[quote=jpinpb]
6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.[/quote]
While technically in the CV zip code, that end of CV goes to PQ schools, and is not generally considered as desireable as the rest of CV.
The damage does seem to be moving closer, though.
August 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM #597679zk
Participant[quote=jpinpb]
6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.[/quote]
While technically in the CV zip code, that end of CV goes to PQ schools, and is not generally considered as desireable as the rest of CV.
The damage does seem to be moving closer, though.
August 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM #597788zk
Participant[quote=jpinpb]
6364 Oleander sold close to 2003 pricing. I’m surprised for CV.[/quote]
While technically in the CV zip code, that end of CV goes to PQ schools, and is not generally considered as desireable as the rest of CV.
The damage does seem to be moving closer, though.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
