- This topic has 75 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #363574March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #364060nostradamusParticipant
That’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #364024nostradamusParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #363868nostradamusParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #364173nostradamusParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #363579nostradamusParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #363892patientrenterParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #364085patientrenterParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #364049patientrenterParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #364198patientrenterParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #363604patientrenterParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #364195urbanrealtorParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #364307urbanrealtorParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #364159urbanrealtorParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #364001urbanrealtorParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.