- This topic has 75 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #364167March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #363579
nostradamus
ParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #363868nostradamus
ParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #364024nostradamus
ParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #364060nostradamus
ParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 4:31 PM #364173nostradamus
ParticipantThat’s good advice!
I guess this loan program is good for people who– perhaps to save their credit rating or their dignity– want to stay in the house at all cost.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #363604patientrenter
ParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #363892patientrenter
ParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #364049patientrenter
ParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #364085patientrenter
ParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM #364198patientrenter
ParticipantIt’s pretty clear why they chose the 105%. If you can take supply off the market all the way up to (5%) more than the market price, that should drive up the market price. If successful, that allows the price to be driven up again off the new higher price, etc, until we have reinflated the bubble.
It may only be 5% at a time, but this is yet another measure designed to ultimately boost home prices so they stay in the stratosphere, and maybe even go higher than they are today.
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #363714urbanrealtor
ParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #364001urbanrealtor
ParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #364159urbanrealtor
ParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
March 10, 2009 at 8:49 PM #364195urbanrealtor
ParticipantSheldon,
Has it occurred to you that the programs can be abbreviated “HAR” and “HAM”?Just sayin’
Dan
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
