- This topic has 185 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by ltokuda.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 9, 2008 at 12:33 AM #183440April 9, 2008 at 6:59 AM #183402alarmclockParticipant
Isn’t it obvious to everyone that we have reached a new long-term stability point in the ratio (0.8)? From this data I would have to conclude that for the next 40 years, the ratio will oscillate around this value. The housing price correction is over, so get in now, while you still can!
April 9, 2008 at 6:59 AM #183415alarmclockParticipantIsn’t it obvious to everyone that we have reached a new long-term stability point in the ratio (0.8)? From this data I would have to conclude that for the next 40 years, the ratio will oscillate around this value. The housing price correction is over, so get in now, while you still can!
April 9, 2008 at 6:59 AM #183443alarmclockParticipantIsn’t it obvious to everyone that we have reached a new long-term stability point in the ratio (0.8)? From this data I would have to conclude that for the next 40 years, the ratio will oscillate around this value. The housing price correction is over, so get in now, while you still can!
April 9, 2008 at 6:59 AM #183449alarmclockParticipantIsn’t it obvious to everyone that we have reached a new long-term stability point in the ratio (0.8)? From this data I would have to conclude that for the next 40 years, the ratio will oscillate around this value. The housing price correction is over, so get in now, while you still can!
April 9, 2008 at 6:59 AM #183455alarmclockParticipantIsn’t it obvious to everyone that we have reached a new long-term stability point in the ratio (0.8)? From this data I would have to conclude that for the next 40 years, the ratio will oscillate around this value. The housing price correction is over, so get in now, while you still can!
April 9, 2008 at 7:33 AM #183412jimcavParticipanti also have trouble understanding what it means–from what i know, the HPI is an index, not actual home prices. it is a weighted average of repeat sales (how the value of a property sold at least twice has changed, not the absolute value of the property). if the ratio was something like home sales prices/annualized rents, then the ratio would obviously be 15-20 in san diego for many areas.
So, the graph says the value of homes is going up much fater than rents, and what no one knows is if it will come back down (either from dramatic drops in the HPI from repeat sales–those 550k otay homes now selling for 350k, or from similar dramitic rise in rents, not likely, or some combo, etc); or plateau as it has in the past. So I’ve been reading a ton and thinking about this housing and ecnomy issues.
My personal opinion, is much like the Soviet’s excessive defense/military focus/spending strained them to breaking, our current ineffective and incompetent spending and focus in iraq will hurt the economy short term and possibly long, as why we focus there, china and others expand their global footprint, influence, etc. So I see further trouble for our economies–so that globalization will help those at the top and make it harder for those lower down to move up in terms of salary, purchasing power, etc. But who knows, if suddenly the gates are shut to immigrants and Visa workers, and the same jobs get filled at higher wages, then you have better salaries and purchasing power on the lower end, but then those costs have to be passed on to consumers, well something has to change…
jimApril 9, 2008 at 7:33 AM #183424jimcavParticipanti also have trouble understanding what it means–from what i know, the HPI is an index, not actual home prices. it is a weighted average of repeat sales (how the value of a property sold at least twice has changed, not the absolute value of the property). if the ratio was something like home sales prices/annualized rents, then the ratio would obviously be 15-20 in san diego for many areas.
So, the graph says the value of homes is going up much fater than rents, and what no one knows is if it will come back down (either from dramatic drops in the HPI from repeat sales–those 550k otay homes now selling for 350k, or from similar dramitic rise in rents, not likely, or some combo, etc); or plateau as it has in the past. So I’ve been reading a ton and thinking about this housing and ecnomy issues.
My personal opinion, is much like the Soviet’s excessive defense/military focus/spending strained them to breaking, our current ineffective and incompetent spending and focus in iraq will hurt the economy short term and possibly long, as why we focus there, china and others expand their global footprint, influence, etc. So I see further trouble for our economies–so that globalization will help those at the top and make it harder for those lower down to move up in terms of salary, purchasing power, etc. But who knows, if suddenly the gates are shut to immigrants and Visa workers, and the same jobs get filled at higher wages, then you have better salaries and purchasing power on the lower end, but then those costs have to be passed on to consumers, well something has to change…
jimApril 9, 2008 at 7:33 AM #183453jimcavParticipanti also have trouble understanding what it means–from what i know, the HPI is an index, not actual home prices. it is a weighted average of repeat sales (how the value of a property sold at least twice has changed, not the absolute value of the property). if the ratio was something like home sales prices/annualized rents, then the ratio would obviously be 15-20 in san diego for many areas.
So, the graph says the value of homes is going up much fater than rents, and what no one knows is if it will come back down (either from dramatic drops in the HPI from repeat sales–those 550k otay homes now selling for 350k, or from similar dramitic rise in rents, not likely, or some combo, etc); or plateau as it has in the past. So I’ve been reading a ton and thinking about this housing and ecnomy issues.
My personal opinion, is much like the Soviet’s excessive defense/military focus/spending strained them to breaking, our current ineffective and incompetent spending and focus in iraq will hurt the economy short term and possibly long, as why we focus there, china and others expand their global footprint, influence, etc. So I see further trouble for our economies–so that globalization will help those at the top and make it harder for those lower down to move up in terms of salary, purchasing power, etc. But who knows, if suddenly the gates are shut to immigrants and Visa workers, and the same jobs get filled at higher wages, then you have better salaries and purchasing power on the lower end, but then those costs have to be passed on to consumers, well something has to change…
jimApril 9, 2008 at 7:33 AM #183459jimcavParticipanti also have trouble understanding what it means–from what i know, the HPI is an index, not actual home prices. it is a weighted average of repeat sales (how the value of a property sold at least twice has changed, not the absolute value of the property). if the ratio was something like home sales prices/annualized rents, then the ratio would obviously be 15-20 in san diego for many areas.
So, the graph says the value of homes is going up much fater than rents, and what no one knows is if it will come back down (either from dramatic drops in the HPI from repeat sales–those 550k otay homes now selling for 350k, or from similar dramitic rise in rents, not likely, or some combo, etc); or plateau as it has in the past. So I’ve been reading a ton and thinking about this housing and ecnomy issues.
My personal opinion, is much like the Soviet’s excessive defense/military focus/spending strained them to breaking, our current ineffective and incompetent spending and focus in iraq will hurt the economy short term and possibly long, as why we focus there, china and others expand their global footprint, influence, etc. So I see further trouble for our economies–so that globalization will help those at the top and make it harder for those lower down to move up in terms of salary, purchasing power, etc. But who knows, if suddenly the gates are shut to immigrants and Visa workers, and the same jobs get filled at higher wages, then you have better salaries and purchasing power on the lower end, but then those costs have to be passed on to consumers, well something has to change…
jimApril 9, 2008 at 7:33 AM #183465jimcavParticipanti also have trouble understanding what it means–from what i know, the HPI is an index, not actual home prices. it is a weighted average of repeat sales (how the value of a property sold at least twice has changed, not the absolute value of the property). if the ratio was something like home sales prices/annualized rents, then the ratio would obviously be 15-20 in san diego for many areas.
So, the graph says the value of homes is going up much fater than rents, and what no one knows is if it will come back down (either from dramatic drops in the HPI from repeat sales–those 550k otay homes now selling for 350k, or from similar dramitic rise in rents, not likely, or some combo, etc); or plateau as it has in the past. So I’ve been reading a ton and thinking about this housing and ecnomy issues.
My personal opinion, is much like the Soviet’s excessive defense/military focus/spending strained them to breaking, our current ineffective and incompetent spending and focus in iraq will hurt the economy short term and possibly long, as why we focus there, china and others expand their global footprint, influence, etc. So I see further trouble for our economies–so that globalization will help those at the top and make it harder for those lower down to move up in terms of salary, purchasing power, etc. But who knows, if suddenly the gates are shut to immigrants and Visa workers, and the same jobs get filled at higher wages, then you have better salaries and purchasing power on the lower end, but then those costs have to be passed on to consumers, well something has to change…
jimApril 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM #183432ltokudaParticipantI think you might be onto something, but I am having trouble understanding this…
ratio = price / rent
What numbers specifically do you use for the graph? Median prices? Annualized median rents? How come your ratio is below 1?
Sandi, for the price index numbers, I got the data from http://www.irrationalexuberance.com. For the rent numbers, I got the data from http://www.bls.gov/data/home.htm. To get the ratio, I just divided those numbers for each year.
The price numbers represent the median house price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. So a single price number by itself doesn't really tell us anything about how much a house costs. But when you graph a series of these numbers over time, it shows you how prices have changed over the years.
The same is true with the rent numbers. The rent numbers represent the median rent price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. I only use this data to see how rent prices have changed over time.
The ratio (price/rent) is also meaningless if you just look at a single value. What's important here is to look at how that ratio has changed over time.
April 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM #183446ltokudaParticipantI think you might be onto something, but I am having trouble understanding this…
ratio = price / rent
What numbers specifically do you use for the graph? Median prices? Annualized median rents? How come your ratio is below 1?
Sandi, for the price index numbers, I got the data from http://www.irrationalexuberance.com. For the rent numbers, I got the data from http://www.bls.gov/data/home.htm. To get the ratio, I just divided those numbers for each year.
The price numbers represent the median house price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. So a single price number by itself doesn't really tell us anything about how much a house costs. But when you graph a series of these numbers over time, it shows you how prices have changed over the years.
The same is true with the rent numbers. The rent numbers represent the median rent price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. I only use this data to see how rent prices have changed over time.
The ratio (price/rent) is also meaningless if you just look at a single value. What's important here is to look at how that ratio has changed over time.
April 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM #183473ltokudaParticipantI think you might be onto something, but I am having trouble understanding this…
ratio = price / rent
What numbers specifically do you use for the graph? Median prices? Annualized median rents? How come your ratio is below 1?
Sandi, for the price index numbers, I got the data from http://www.irrationalexuberance.com. For the rent numbers, I got the data from http://www.bls.gov/data/home.htm. To get the ratio, I just divided those numbers for each year.
The price numbers represent the median house price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. So a single price number by itself doesn't really tell us anything about how much a house costs. But when you graph a series of these numbers over time, it shows you how prices have changed over the years.
The same is true with the rent numbers. The rent numbers represent the median rent price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. I only use this data to see how rent prices have changed over time.
The ratio (price/rent) is also meaningless if you just look at a single value. What's important here is to look at how that ratio has changed over time.
April 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM #183479ltokudaParticipantI think you might be onto something, but I am having trouble understanding this…
ratio = price / rent
What numbers specifically do you use for the graph? Median prices? Annualized median rents? How come your ratio is below 1?
Sandi, for the price index numbers, I got the data from http://www.irrationalexuberance.com. For the rent numbers, I got the data from http://www.bls.gov/data/home.htm. To get the ratio, I just divided those numbers for each year.
The price numbers represent the median house price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. So a single price number by itself doesn't really tell us anything about how much a house costs. But when you graph a series of these numbers over time, it shows you how prices have changed over the years.
The same is true with the rent numbers. The rent numbers represent the median rent price but do not tell you the actual $ amount. I only use this data to see how rent prices have changed over time.
The ratio (price/rent) is also meaningless if you just look at a single value. What's important here is to look at how that ratio has changed over time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.