- This topic has 86 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 13, 2007 at 5:25 AM #115833December 13, 2007 at 6:42 AM #116026JumbyParticipant
NeetaT,
I love you how you find a way to weave property taxes into every conversation….people usually don’t consider this on going expense…
December 13, 2007 at 6:42 AM #116064JumbyParticipantNeetaT,
I love you how you find a way to weave property taxes into every conversation….people usually don’t consider this on going expense…
December 13, 2007 at 6:42 AM #115859JumbyParticipantNeetaT,
I love you how you find a way to weave property taxes into every conversation….people usually don’t consider this on going expense…
December 13, 2007 at 6:42 AM #115990JumbyParticipantNeetaT,
I love you how you find a way to weave property taxes into every conversation….people usually don’t consider this on going expense…
December 13, 2007 at 6:42 AM #116022JumbyParticipantNeetaT,
I love you how you find a way to weave property taxes into every conversation….people usually don’t consider this on going expense…
December 13, 2007 at 7:33 AM #116027NeetaTParticipant“people usually don’t consider this on going expense…”
Yes, I believe you are correct in your assertion. People seem to be apathetic towards the subject of property tax, maybe because it’s out of one’s control. If San Diego or any other municipality can justify the need to spend two to three times what they spent 5yrs ago, I will listen. But I must confess that if you do the math, there is no way that much money is needed to fund a city. Give the property owners a break and let them spend the saved money on other things. If I were to buy a house now, I would possibly be paying more tax than my neighbor who bought several years ago all for the same sub standard services. I realize that very few people share my view including my wife.
December 13, 2007 at 7:33 AM #116031NeetaTParticipant“people usually don’t consider this on going expense…”
Yes, I believe you are correct in your assertion. People seem to be apathetic towards the subject of property tax, maybe because it’s out of one’s control. If San Diego or any other municipality can justify the need to spend two to three times what they spent 5yrs ago, I will listen. But I must confess that if you do the math, there is no way that much money is needed to fund a city. Give the property owners a break and let them spend the saved money on other things. If I were to buy a house now, I would possibly be paying more tax than my neighbor who bought several years ago all for the same sub standard services. I realize that very few people share my view including my wife.
December 13, 2007 at 7:33 AM #116069NeetaTParticipant“people usually don’t consider this on going expense…”
Yes, I believe you are correct in your assertion. People seem to be apathetic towards the subject of property tax, maybe because it’s out of one’s control. If San Diego or any other municipality can justify the need to spend two to three times what they spent 5yrs ago, I will listen. But I must confess that if you do the math, there is no way that much money is needed to fund a city. Give the property owners a break and let them spend the saved money on other things. If I were to buy a house now, I would possibly be paying more tax than my neighbor who bought several years ago all for the same sub standard services. I realize that very few people share my view including my wife.
December 13, 2007 at 7:33 AM #115995NeetaTParticipant“people usually don’t consider this on going expense…”
Yes, I believe you are correct in your assertion. People seem to be apathetic towards the subject of property tax, maybe because it’s out of one’s control. If San Diego or any other municipality can justify the need to spend two to three times what they spent 5yrs ago, I will listen. But I must confess that if you do the math, there is no way that much money is needed to fund a city. Give the property owners a break and let them spend the saved money on other things. If I were to buy a house now, I would possibly be paying more tax than my neighbor who bought several years ago all for the same sub standard services. I realize that very few people share my view including my wife.
December 13, 2007 at 7:33 AM #115864NeetaTParticipant“people usually don’t consider this on going expense…”
Yes, I believe you are correct in your assertion. People seem to be apathetic towards the subject of property tax, maybe because it’s out of one’s control. If San Diego or any other municipality can justify the need to spend two to three times what they spent 5yrs ago, I will listen. But I must confess that if you do the math, there is no way that much money is needed to fund a city. Give the property owners a break and let them spend the saved money on other things. If I were to buy a house now, I would possibly be paying more tax than my neighbor who bought several years ago all for the same sub standard services. I realize that very few people share my view including my wife.
December 13, 2007 at 8:08 AM #116014patientlywaitingParticipantNeetaT, I completely share your view.
The services were getting are certainly not proportional to the increase in property taxes we are paying.December 13, 2007 at 8:08 AM #116089patientlywaitingParticipantNeetaT, I completely share your view.
The services were getting are certainly not proportional to the increase in property taxes we are paying.December 13, 2007 at 8:08 AM #115884patientlywaitingParticipantNeetaT, I completely share your view.
The services were getting are certainly not proportional to the increase in property taxes we are paying.December 13, 2007 at 8:08 AM #116046patientlywaitingParticipantNeetaT, I completely share your view.
The services were getting are certainly not proportional to the increase in property taxes we are paying. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.