- This topic has 102 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by
Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2010 at 3:58 PM #545565April 28, 2010 at 4:18 PM #544623
SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with FLU however full disclosure about the neighborhood nuisance would be required.
April 28, 2010 at 4:18 PM #544738SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with FLU however full disclosure about the neighborhood nuisance would be required.
April 28, 2010 at 4:18 PM #545216SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with FLU however full disclosure about the neighborhood nuisance would be required.
April 28, 2010 at 4:18 PM #545313SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with FLU however full disclosure about the neighborhood nuisance would be required.
April 28, 2010 at 4:18 PM #545585SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with FLU however full disclosure about the neighborhood nuisance would be required.
April 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM #544654EconProf
ParticipantYou and the neighbors can sue them as a neighborhood nuisance that is hurting your quality of life. I and a bunch of my tenants did it successfully years ago in a Normal Heights rental complex I owned. The Apt. building next door had years upon years of drug dealing, junked cars, trash, noise, crime, police visits, etc.
Under a San Diego program I hope is still in place, we kept logs, photographs, police report logs, & other evidence of the neighborhood disruption (what we economists call negative externalities) as spewed by the nonresponsive and utterly indifferent owner/landlord.
Went to court, won. Every tenant participating got from several hundred $ to several thousand, based on proximity to the problem.
That was soooo satisfying.
The problems abated, somewhat. Had they continued, we could have repeated the process.April 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM #544768EconProf
ParticipantYou and the neighbors can sue them as a neighborhood nuisance that is hurting your quality of life. I and a bunch of my tenants did it successfully years ago in a Normal Heights rental complex I owned. The Apt. building next door had years upon years of drug dealing, junked cars, trash, noise, crime, police visits, etc.
Under a San Diego program I hope is still in place, we kept logs, photographs, police report logs, & other evidence of the neighborhood disruption (what we economists call negative externalities) as spewed by the nonresponsive and utterly indifferent owner/landlord.
Went to court, won. Every tenant participating got from several hundred $ to several thousand, based on proximity to the problem.
That was soooo satisfying.
The problems abated, somewhat. Had they continued, we could have repeated the process.April 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM #545246EconProf
ParticipantYou and the neighbors can sue them as a neighborhood nuisance that is hurting your quality of life. I and a bunch of my tenants did it successfully years ago in a Normal Heights rental complex I owned. The Apt. building next door had years upon years of drug dealing, junked cars, trash, noise, crime, police visits, etc.
Under a San Diego program I hope is still in place, we kept logs, photographs, police report logs, & other evidence of the neighborhood disruption (what we economists call negative externalities) as spewed by the nonresponsive and utterly indifferent owner/landlord.
Went to court, won. Every tenant participating got from several hundred $ to several thousand, based on proximity to the problem.
That was soooo satisfying.
The problems abated, somewhat. Had they continued, we could have repeated the process.April 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM #545343EconProf
ParticipantYou and the neighbors can sue them as a neighborhood nuisance that is hurting your quality of life. I and a bunch of my tenants did it successfully years ago in a Normal Heights rental complex I owned. The Apt. building next door had years upon years of drug dealing, junked cars, trash, noise, crime, police visits, etc.
Under a San Diego program I hope is still in place, we kept logs, photographs, police report logs, & other evidence of the neighborhood disruption (what we economists call negative externalities) as spewed by the nonresponsive and utterly indifferent owner/landlord.
Went to court, won. Every tenant participating got from several hundred $ to several thousand, based on proximity to the problem.
That was soooo satisfying.
The problems abated, somewhat. Had they continued, we could have repeated the process.April 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM #545615EconProf
ParticipantYou and the neighbors can sue them as a neighborhood nuisance that is hurting your quality of life. I and a bunch of my tenants did it successfully years ago in a Normal Heights rental complex I owned. The Apt. building next door had years upon years of drug dealing, junked cars, trash, noise, crime, police visits, etc.
Under a San Diego program I hope is still in place, we kept logs, photographs, police report logs, & other evidence of the neighborhood disruption (what we economists call negative externalities) as spewed by the nonresponsive and utterly indifferent owner/landlord.
Went to court, won. Every tenant participating got from several hundred $ to several thousand, based on proximity to the problem.
That was soooo satisfying.
The problems abated, somewhat. Had they continued, we could have repeated the process.April 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM #544664PCinSD
GuestThis nice lady in Del Mar has a colony of bees she is giving away:
April 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM #544778PCinSD
GuestThis nice lady in Del Mar has a colony of bees she is giving away:
April 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM #545256PCinSD
GuestThis nice lady in Del Mar has a colony of bees she is giving away:
April 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM #545353PCinSD
GuestThis nice lady in Del Mar has a colony of bees she is giving away:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.