- This topic has 210 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by
abell.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM #466638October 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #465817
Veritas
ParticipantAllan,
Nothing in print is binding. The bill will be totally porked up before it ever becomes law even if it is passed and a lot of the blue dogs are scared $hitless over the possibility of having to work for a living. They are all afraid of the back lash from the taxpayers. Unemployment is much higher than reported, California is bleeding red ink and this legislative boondoggle is nothing more than a power grab. All but the most ardent Marxist on Piggington’s get it and finally, none of it is about helping the poor. If it was there would be some tax relief, not VAT as proposed by that moron Pelosi. The only ones that will do well here are the very rich, who can go elsewhere for what they need, the very poor who will always be cared for here (until the revolution when they will resort to canibalism) and the corportate insurers who will become even wealthier when the uninsured by choice are force by fiat to get insurance. This disaster brought to you by well meaning ninnies in Congress! Choice and competition.
October 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #466006ParticipantAllan,
Nothing in print is binding. The bill will be totally porked up before it ever becomes law even if it is passed and a lot of the blue dogs are scared $hitless over the possibility of having to work for a living. They are all afraid of the back lash from the taxpayers. Unemployment is much higher than reported, California is bleeding red ink and this legislative boondoggle is nothing more than a power grab. All but the most ardent Marxist on Piggington’s get it and finally, none of it is about helping the poor. If it was there would be some tax relief, not VAT as proposed by that moron Pelosi. The only ones that will do well here are the very rich, who can go elsewhere for what they need, the very poor who will always be cared for here (until the revolution when they will resort to canibalism) and the corportate insurers who will become even wealthier when the uninsured by choice are force by fiat to get insurance. This disaster brought to you by well meaning ninnies in Congress! Choice and competition.
October 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #466362ParticipantAllan,
Nothing in print is binding. The bill will be totally porked up before it ever becomes law even if it is passed and a lot of the blue dogs are scared $hitless over the possibility of having to work for a living. They are all afraid of the back lash from the taxpayers. Unemployment is much higher than reported, California is bleeding red ink and this legislative boondoggle is nothing more than a power grab. All but the most ardent Marxist on Piggington’s get it and finally, none of it is about helping the poor. If it was there would be some tax relief, not VAT as proposed by that moron Pelosi. The only ones that will do well here are the very rich, who can go elsewhere for what they need, the very poor who will always be cared for here (until the revolution when they will resort to canibalism) and the corportate insurers who will become even wealthier when the uninsured by choice are force by fiat to get insurance. This disaster brought to you by well meaning ninnies in Congress! Choice and competition.
October 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #466435ParticipantAllan,
Nothing in print is binding. The bill will be totally porked up before it ever becomes law even if it is passed and a lot of the blue dogs are scared $hitless over the possibility of having to work for a living. They are all afraid of the back lash from the taxpayers. Unemployment is much higher than reported, California is bleeding red ink and this legislative boondoggle is nothing more than a power grab. All but the most ardent Marxist on Piggington’s get it and finally, none of it is about helping the poor. If it was there would be some tax relief, not VAT as proposed by that moron Pelosi. The only ones that will do well here are the very rich, who can go elsewhere for what they need, the very poor who will always be cared for here (until the revolution when they will resort to canibalism) and the corportate insurers who will become even wealthier when the uninsured by choice are force by fiat to get insurance. This disaster brought to you by well meaning ninnies in Congress! Choice and competition.
October 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #466643ParticipantAllan,
Nothing in print is binding. The bill will be totally porked up before it ever becomes law even if it is passed and a lot of the blue dogs are scared $hitless over the possibility of having to work for a living. They are all afraid of the back lash from the taxpayers. Unemployment is much higher than reported, California is bleeding red ink and this legislative boondoggle is nothing more than a power grab. All but the most ardent Marxist on Piggington’s get it and finally, none of it is about helping the poor. If it was there would be some tax relief, not VAT as proposed by that moron Pelosi. The only ones that will do well here are the very rich, who can go elsewhere for what they need, the very poor who will always be cared for here (until the revolution when they will resort to canibalism) and the corportate insurers who will become even wealthier when the uninsured by choice are force by fiat to get insurance. This disaster brought to you by well meaning ninnies in Congress! Choice and competition.
October 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM #465862sd_matt
Participant[quote=sd_matt][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=equalizer]
It is well laid out in this long article below which is titled
“How American Health Care Killed My Father”. Highly recommended for anyone who cares to understand the issues.Simple solution: Require catastrophic insurance for everyone (subsidy for poor) and have users pay (edit-) cash for everything else. This will increase competition, increase quality of care, and reduce costs.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/health-care/2%5B/quote%5D
I skipped to the end where he outlines his solution. It makes more sense to me than something ( whatever it may be ) designed by Congress.
To Nicole. Your a physician. What do you think about the solutions presented in the last page or two of this article?
Equalizer: That article should be required reading by everyone participating in the debate, whether individually or as part of the government effort.Absolutely excellent article and it laid everything out in clear, understandable terms and language.
His solution, while simple and apparently workable, would undoubtedly be assailed viciously by industry lobbyists, which means it would probably work.[/quote]
This crossed my mind before but I still need to read the article.[/quote]
I skipped to the last page or two where he outlines his solution. Makes much more sense to me than any solution from the monkeys that make up Congress.
Nicole. You are a physician. What do you think about his idea. Last page or two.
October 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM #466051Participant[quote=sd_matt][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=equalizer]
It is well laid out in this long article below which is titled
“How American Health Care Killed My Father”. Highly recommended for anyone who cares to understand the issues.Simple solution: Require catastrophic insurance for everyone (subsidy for poor) and have users pay (edit-) cash for everything else. This will increase competition, increase quality of care, and reduce costs.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/health-care/2%5B/quote%5D
I skipped to the end where he outlines his solution. It makes more sense to me than something ( whatever it may be ) designed by Congress.
To Nicole. Your a physician. What do you think about the solutions presented in the last page or two of this article?
Equalizer: That article should be required reading by everyone participating in the debate, whether individually or as part of the government effort.Absolutely excellent article and it laid everything out in clear, understandable terms and language.
His solution, while simple and apparently workable, would undoubtedly be assailed viciously by industry lobbyists, which means it would probably work.[/quote]
This crossed my mind before but I still need to read the article.[/quote]
I skipped to the last page or two where he outlines his solution. Makes much more sense to me than any solution from the monkeys that make up Congress.
Nicole. You are a physician. What do you think about his idea. Last page or two.
October 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM #466407Participant[quote=sd_matt][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=equalizer]
It is well laid out in this long article below which is titled
“How American Health Care Killed My Father”. Highly recommended for anyone who cares to understand the issues.Simple solution: Require catastrophic insurance for everyone (subsidy for poor) and have users pay (edit-) cash for everything else. This will increase competition, increase quality of care, and reduce costs.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/health-care/2%5B/quote%5D
I skipped to the end where he outlines his solution. It makes more sense to me than something ( whatever it may be ) designed by Congress.
To Nicole. Your a physician. What do you think about the solutions presented in the last page or two of this article?
Equalizer: That article should be required reading by everyone participating in the debate, whether individually or as part of the government effort.Absolutely excellent article and it laid everything out in clear, understandable terms and language.
His solution, while simple and apparently workable, would undoubtedly be assailed viciously by industry lobbyists, which means it would probably work.[/quote]
This crossed my mind before but I still need to read the article.[/quote]
I skipped to the last page or two where he outlines his solution. Makes much more sense to me than any solution from the monkeys that make up Congress.
Nicole. You are a physician. What do you think about his idea. Last page or two.
October 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM #466481Participant[quote=sd_matt][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=equalizer]
It is well laid out in this long article below which is titled
“How American Health Care Killed My Father”. Highly recommended for anyone who cares to understand the issues.Simple solution: Require catastrophic insurance for everyone (subsidy for poor) and have users pay (edit-) cash for everything else. This will increase competition, increase quality of care, and reduce costs.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/health-care/2%5B/quote%5D
I skipped to the end where he outlines his solution. It makes more sense to me than something ( whatever it may be ) designed by Congress.
To Nicole. Your a physician. What do you think about the solutions presented in the last page or two of this article?
Equalizer: That article should be required reading by everyone participating in the debate, whether individually or as part of the government effort.Absolutely excellent article and it laid everything out in clear, understandable terms and language.
His solution, while simple and apparently workable, would undoubtedly be assailed viciously by industry lobbyists, which means it would probably work.[/quote]
This crossed my mind before but I still need to read the article.[/quote]
I skipped to the last page or two where he outlines his solution. Makes much more sense to me than any solution from the monkeys that make up Congress.
Nicole. You are a physician. What do you think about his idea. Last page or two.
October 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM #466688Participant[quote=sd_matt][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=equalizer]
It is well laid out in this long article below which is titled
“How American Health Care Killed My Father”. Highly recommended for anyone who cares to understand the issues.Simple solution: Require catastrophic insurance for everyone (subsidy for poor) and have users pay (edit-) cash for everything else. This will increase competition, increase quality of care, and reduce costs.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/health-care/2%5B/quote%5D
I skipped to the end where he outlines his solution. It makes more sense to me than something ( whatever it may be ) designed by Congress.
To Nicole. Your a physician. What do you think about the solutions presented in the last page or two of this article?
Equalizer: That article should be required reading by everyone participating in the debate, whether individually or as part of the government effort.Absolutely excellent article and it laid everything out in clear, understandable terms and language.
His solution, while simple and apparently workable, would undoubtedly be assailed viciously by industry lobbyists, which means it would probably work.[/quote]
This crossed my mind before but I still need to read the article.[/quote]
I skipped to the last page or two where he outlines his solution. Makes much more sense to me than any solution from the monkeys that make up Congress.
Nicole. You are a physician. What do you think about his idea. Last page or two.
October 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM #465882ParticipantOops I put my response in there twice in different place.
October 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM #466069ParticipantOops I put my response in there twice in different place.
October 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM #466426ParticipantOops I put my response in there twice in different place.
October 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM #466500ParticipantOops I put my response in there twice in different place.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
