griffin federal reserve

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=davelj][quote=Rich Toscano][quote=davelj] (You may not know, but his policy for the last couple of years has been to post only in threads he starts or to questions about something he’s specifically posted previously.) [/quote]

Actually, davelj gives me too much credit here… he is assuming that my lack of forum participation is the result of a policy when it is, in fact, purely a result of laziness. :-)[/quote]

Perhaps I should have said your policy of laziness. Ha! Seriously, though, I thought there were potential compliance issues related to your day job with posting here (or anywhere else), so you wanted to keep it to a minimum. But perhaps I misremember (to quote W).[/quote]

I see… yeah, you are partly correct. I can’t really join discussions about securities (at least, not without causing a bit of hassle). So I steer clear of that topic for regulatory reasons. In most cases, though, it’s the sloth.

[SK in CV]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.

[SK in CV]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.

[SK in CV]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.

[SK in CV]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.

[SK in CV]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.

[afx114]

What’s my nickname? I want a nickname.

[afx114]

What’s my nickname? I want a nickname.

[afx114]

What’s my nickname? I want a nickname.

[afx114]

What’s my nickname? I want a nickname.

[afx114]

What’s my nickname? I want a nickname.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.[/quote]

SK: I’m going to cut-and-paste this into a Word doc and save it. That post is pure frickin’ genius! I was howling when I read that.

Dan: Please get back on your meds. Please.

Afx: You SHOULD have a nickname. As one of the true liberal posters (not a stinky Leftie) you should receive a special moniker.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.[/quote]

SK: I’m going to cut-and-paste this into a Word doc and save it. That post is pure frickin’ genius! I was howling when I read that.

Dan: Please get back on your meds. Please.

Afx: You SHOULD have a nickname. As one of the true liberal posters (not a stinky Leftie) you should receive a special moniker.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.[/quote]

SK: I’m going to cut-and-paste this into a Word doc and save it. That post is pure frickin’ genius! I was howling when I read that.

Dan: Please get back on your meds. Please.

Afx: You SHOULD have a nickname. As one of the true liberal posters (not a stinky Leftie) you should receive a special moniker.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=urbanrealtor]
Thankfully, SK is back and we can get back to more clear discussions about how his involvment with the Fed has caused our large shark subsidies to wane.[/quote]

That’s the difference between you and me. I’m all for shark subsidies. But only SMALL shark subsidies. You just want to subsidize the large sharks, which, over the last 40 years, have grown bigger and bigger, as the small sharks shrink. Our economy grew strong during the middle of this century on the jobs created by small sharks. The nurses, the sands, the Dwarf Lanternfish (yeah, I looked that one up)….and you want to fund the threshers, the great whites and the hammerheads. That trickle down sharkonomy just doesn’t work. It’s a fallacy. Probably invented by Ronald Reagan.[/quote]

SK: I’m going to cut-and-paste this into a Word doc and save it. That post is pure frickin’ genius! I was howling when I read that.

Dan: Please get back on your meds. Please.

Afx: You SHOULD have a nickname. As one of the true liberal posters (not a stinky Leftie) you should receive a special moniker.

[Author]

Posts