griffin federal reserve

[ucodegen]

[quote davelj]
My deepest apologies. Rain check. I owe you two (Argentinian strippers, that is).
[/quote]
Umm.. I hope they are female Argentinian strippers(naturally, not surgically).
A Katoey or Bakla is too much for my mind to handle. I am not that far on the ‘wild side’..

[aldante]

But to get back to the original point, I don’t have any great problem with the fractional reserve system in general. But I have a big problem with the manner in which it has been administered – problems exacerbated by the likes of Greenspan, Bernanke, Summers, et al. But let’s not confuse the two issues. And, more on topic, none of this has anything to do with the legitimacy of Edward Griffin. In this debate, both Greenspan and Griffin can be quacks. It’s not a mutually exclusive condition.[/quote]

I am glad that you have reached this conclusion. Becasue
My Point is this…….Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The entire money printing system is thus out of joint and needs to be changed.
By the way most of the Economic papers I have read use Scientific evidence. And while “discovery of priciples” those priciples are only valid if they can predict outcomes.

[aldante]

But to get back to the original point, I don’t have any great problem with the fractional reserve system in general. But I have a big problem with the manner in which it has been administered – problems exacerbated by the likes of Greenspan, Bernanke, Summers, et al. But let’s not confuse the two issues. And, more on topic, none of this has anything to do with the legitimacy of Edward Griffin. In this debate, both Greenspan and Griffin can be quacks. It’s not a mutually exclusive condition.[/quote]

I am glad that you have reached this conclusion. Becasue
My Point is this…….Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The entire money printing system is thus out of joint and needs to be changed.
By the way most of the Economic papers I have read use Scientific evidence. And while “discovery of priciples” those priciples are only valid if they can predict outcomes.

[aldante]

But to get back to the original point, I don’t have any great problem with the fractional reserve system in general. But I have a big problem with the manner in which it has been administered – problems exacerbated by the likes of Greenspan, Bernanke, Summers, et al. But let’s not confuse the two issues. And, more on topic, none of this has anything to do with the legitimacy of Edward Griffin. In this debate, both Greenspan and Griffin can be quacks. It’s not a mutually exclusive condition.[/quote]

I am glad that you have reached this conclusion. Becasue
My Point is this…….Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The entire money printing system is thus out of joint and needs to be changed.
By the way most of the Economic papers I have read use Scientific evidence. And while “discovery of priciples” those priciples are only valid if they can predict outcomes.

[aldante]

But to get back to the original point, I don’t have any great problem with the fractional reserve system in general. But I have a big problem with the manner in which it has been administered – problems exacerbated by the likes of Greenspan, Bernanke, Summers, et al. But let’s not confuse the two issues. And, more on topic, none of this has anything to do with the legitimacy of Edward Griffin. In this debate, both Greenspan and Griffin can be quacks. It’s not a mutually exclusive condition.[/quote]

I am glad that you have reached this conclusion. Becasue
My Point is this…….Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The entire money printing system is thus out of joint and needs to be changed.
By the way most of the Economic papers I have read use Scientific evidence. And while “discovery of priciples” those priciples are only valid if they can predict outcomes.

[aldante]

But to get back to the original point, I don’t have any great problem with the fractional reserve system in general. But I have a big problem with the manner in which it has been administered – problems exacerbated by the likes of Greenspan, Bernanke, Summers, et al. But let’s not confuse the two issues. And, more on topic, none of this has anything to do with the legitimacy of Edward Griffin. In this debate, both Greenspan and Griffin can be quacks. It’s not a mutually exclusive condition.[/quote]

I am glad that you have reached this conclusion. Becasue
My Point is this…….Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The entire money printing system is thus out of joint and needs to be changed.
By the way most of the Economic papers I have read use Scientific evidence. And while “discovery of priciples” those priciples are only valid if they can predict outcomes.

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?[/quote]
I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?[/quote]
I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?[/quote]
I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?[/quote]
I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?[/quote]
I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?[/quote]

I’m sure you do consider a CPA an academic position (its not, of course). CPA stands for “Certified Public Accountant” and is a statutory title, not a degree. I do have respect for the work SK put in, hence my referencing his CPA in one of my earlier posts.

And, yes, I got your little barb about my not having a CPA, and, truthfully, not a night goes by that I don’t cry myself to sleep over it. I’ve also not run with the bulls in Pamplona, nor have I danced with the Bolshoi Ballet. All of these things haunt me ceaselessly.

I would opine that, if I were to have spent 16 years in Collage, I’d be pretty peeved with the results of my efforts, if this is the best you can come up with. I’d certainly hope for some blistering ripostes and the ability to showcase my towering intellect with a carefully crafted and splendidly deployed campaign of rhetorical “shock and awe”. A virtuoso tour-de-force, if you will.

Instead we’re treated to schoolyard putdowns and a stumbling, ham-handed assault that would embarrass a 4th grader. I’m guessing its hard to see through your tears and that snot is fouling the keyboard, thus causing this level of fumbling ineptitude.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?[/quote]

I’m sure you do consider a CPA an academic position (its not, of course). CPA stands for “Certified Public Accountant” and is a statutory title, not a degree. I do have respect for the work SK put in, hence my referencing his CPA in one of my earlier posts.

And, yes, I got your little barb about my not having a CPA, and, truthfully, not a night goes by that I don’t cry myself to sleep over it. I’ve also not run with the bulls in Pamplona, nor have I danced with the Bolshoi Ballet. All of these things haunt me ceaselessly.

I would opine that, if I were to have spent 16 years in Collage, I’d be pretty peeved with the results of my efforts, if this is the best you can come up with. I’d certainly hope for some blistering ripostes and the ability to showcase my towering intellect with a carefully crafted and splendidly deployed campaign of rhetorical “shock and awe”. A virtuoso tour-de-force, if you will.

Instead we’re treated to schoolyard putdowns and a stumbling, ham-handed assault that would embarrass a 4th grader. I’m guessing its hard to see through your tears and that snot is fouling the keyboard, thus causing this level of fumbling ineptitude.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?[/quote]

I’m sure you do consider a CPA an academic position (its not, of course). CPA stands for “Certified Public Accountant” and is a statutory title, not a degree. I do have respect for the work SK put in, hence my referencing his CPA in one of my earlier posts.

And, yes, I got your little barb about my not having a CPA, and, truthfully, not a night goes by that I don’t cry myself to sleep over it. I’ve also not run with the bulls in Pamplona, nor have I danced with the Bolshoi Ballet. All of these things haunt me ceaselessly.

I would opine that, if I were to have spent 16 years in Collage, I’d be pretty peeved with the results of my efforts, if this is the best you can come up with. I’d certainly hope for some blistering ripostes and the ability to showcase my towering intellect with a carefully crafted and splendidly deployed campaign of rhetorical “shock and awe”. A virtuoso tour-de-force, if you will.

Instead we’re treated to schoolyard putdowns and a stumbling, ham-handed assault that would embarrass a 4th grader. I’m guessing its hard to see through your tears and that snot is fouling the keyboard, thus causing this level of fumbling ineptitude.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I consider a CPA an academic position. Maybe you don’t have the respect I do for the work that went into obtaining it. But, then again, you don’t have one do you?[/quote]

I’m sure you do consider a CPA an academic position (its not, of course). CPA stands for “Certified Public Accountant” and is a statutory title, not a degree. I do have respect for the work SK put in, hence my referencing his CPA in one of my earlier posts.

And, yes, I got your little barb about my not having a CPA, and, truthfully, not a night goes by that I don’t cry myself to sleep over it. I’ve also not run with the bulls in Pamplona, nor have I danced with the Bolshoi Ballet. All of these things haunt me ceaselessly.

I would opine that, if I were to have spent 16 years in Collage, I’d be pretty peeved with the results of my efforts, if this is the best you can come up with. I’d certainly hope for some blistering ripostes and the ability to showcase my towering intellect with a carefully crafted and splendidly deployed campaign of rhetorical “shock and awe”. A virtuoso tour-de-force, if you will.

Instead we’re treated to schoolyard putdowns and a stumbling, ham-handed assault that would embarrass a 4th grader. I’m guessing its hard to see through your tears and that snot is fouling the keyboard, thus causing this level of fumbling ineptitude.

[Author]

Posts