griffin federal reserve

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)
[/quote]
Um I think that may be “SK in CV” not “SV CV”.. not the ‘two’ mistake you were expecting?

Actually I would agree that SK in CV gets a pass. Their ‘creds’ were offered up by another person before they made any statement. Their statement might be considered clarification.

Now if Allan from Fallbrook brought up his own creds w/o being asked or prompted, that would be a different story.

[quote investor]
Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back?
[/quote]

umm.. bordering on slander via innuendo?

[SK in CV]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.

[SK in CV]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.

[SK in CV]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.

[SK in CV]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.

[SK in CV]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.

[ucodegen]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.[/quote]

I would think it would be a good idea to make the ownership public just from a public transparency standpoint. It is indirectly a branch of the government – almost FRE/FNM style.

[ucodegen]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.[/quote]

I would think it would be a good idea to make the ownership public just from a public transparency standpoint. It is indirectly a branch of the government – almost FRE/FNM style.

[ucodegen]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.[/quote]

I would think it would be a good idea to make the ownership public just from a public transparency standpoint. It is indirectly a branch of the government – almost FRE/FNM style.

[ucodegen]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.[/quote]

I would think it would be a good idea to make the ownership public just from a public transparency standpoint. It is indirectly a branch of the government – almost FRE/FNM style.

[ucodegen]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=pri_dk][quote=SK in CV]While the specific ownership isn’t public record[/quote]

Why is this kept secret?

I’m not losing any sleep over this, but it is kinda curious.[/quote]

That is a good question. I don’t really know the answer. I suspect it’s because there aren’t any regulations that make it mandatory. Solely in order to quell the paranoia of conspiracy theorists, it might not be a bad idea to create those regulations. On the other hand, since the paranoid conspiracy theorists don’t believe audited financial statements as it is, they probably wouldn’t believe any published ownership listing either.[/quote]

I would think it would be a good idea to make the ownership public just from a public transparency standpoint. It is indirectly a branch of the government – almost FRE/FNM style.

[ucodegen]

[quote davelj]
My deepest apologies. Rain check. I owe you two (Argentinian strippers, that is).
[/quote]
Umm.. I hope they are female Argentinian strippers(naturally, not surgically).
A Katoey or Bakla is too much for my mind to handle. I am not that far on the ‘wild side’..

[ucodegen]

[quote davelj]
My deepest apologies. Rain check. I owe you two (Argentinian strippers, that is).
[/quote]
Umm.. I hope they are female Argentinian strippers(naturally, not surgically).
A Katoey or Bakla is too much for my mind to handle. I am not that far on the ‘wild side’..

[ucodegen]

[quote davelj]
My deepest apologies. Rain check. I owe you two (Argentinian strippers, that is).
[/quote]
Umm.. I hope they are female Argentinian strippers(naturally, not surgically).
A Katoey or Bakla is too much for my mind to handle. I am not that far on the ‘wild side’..

[ucodegen]

[quote davelj]
My deepest apologies. Rain check. I owe you two (Argentinian strippers, that is).
[/quote]
Umm.. I hope they are female Argentinian strippers(naturally, not surgically).
A Katoey or Bakla is too much for my mind to handle. I am not that far on the ‘wild side’..

[Author]

Posts