- This topic has 70 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2010 at 4:30 PM #17264March 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM #531221anParticipant
I’m not surprised at all. I’m pulling out my popcorn and enjoying the fight. Foreclosure tsunami vs US Government.
March 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM #532157anParticipantI’m not surprised at all. I’m pulling out my popcorn and enjoying the fight. Foreclosure tsunami vs US Government.
March 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM #531898anParticipantI’m not surprised at all. I’m pulling out my popcorn and enjoying the fight. Foreclosure tsunami vs US Government.
March 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM #531800anParticipantI’m not surprised at all. I’m pulling out my popcorn and enjoying the fight. Foreclosure tsunami vs US Government.
March 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM #531349anParticipantI’m not surprised at all. I’m pulling out my popcorn and enjoying the fight. Foreclosure tsunami vs US Government.
March 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM #531913jpinpbParticipantMy favorite line was:
The changes “will better assist responsible homeowners who have been affected by the economic crisis through no fault of their own,” an administration official said.
However, the catch is this:
“The program is designed to lower borrowers’ monthly payments by reducing mortgage rates to as low as 2 percent for five years and extending loan terms up to 40 years. To complete the program, homeowners need to go through a three month trial period and provide proof of their income, plus a letter documenting their financial hardship.”
I’m thinking all these programs have failed b/c people just plain and simple can’t afford the houses they bought during the bubble. They can’t modify the loan b/c the people can’t prove they can make the payments.
For those who can prove they can make the payments, what kind of incentive is a low rate for only 5 years and extending the loan to 40 years. Seems like more temporary band-aids.
March 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM #532172jpinpbParticipantMy favorite line was:
The changes “will better assist responsible homeowners who have been affected by the economic crisis through no fault of their own,” an administration official said.
However, the catch is this:
“The program is designed to lower borrowers’ monthly payments by reducing mortgage rates to as low as 2 percent for five years and extending loan terms up to 40 years. To complete the program, homeowners need to go through a three month trial period and provide proof of their income, plus a letter documenting their financial hardship.”
I’m thinking all these programs have failed b/c people just plain and simple can’t afford the houses they bought during the bubble. They can’t modify the loan b/c the people can’t prove they can make the payments.
For those who can prove they can make the payments, what kind of incentive is a low rate for only 5 years and extending the loan to 40 years. Seems like more temporary band-aids.
March 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM #531815jpinpbParticipantMy favorite line was:
The changes “will better assist responsible homeowners who have been affected by the economic crisis through no fault of their own,” an administration official said.
However, the catch is this:
“The program is designed to lower borrowers’ monthly payments by reducing mortgage rates to as low as 2 percent for five years and extending loan terms up to 40 years. To complete the program, homeowners need to go through a three month trial period and provide proof of their income, plus a letter documenting their financial hardship.”
I’m thinking all these programs have failed b/c people just plain and simple can’t afford the houses they bought during the bubble. They can’t modify the loan b/c the people can’t prove they can make the payments.
For those who can prove they can make the payments, what kind of incentive is a low rate for only 5 years and extending the loan to 40 years. Seems like more temporary band-aids.
March 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM #531364jpinpbParticipantMy favorite line was:
The changes “will better assist responsible homeowners who have been affected by the economic crisis through no fault of their own,” an administration official said.
However, the catch is this:
“The program is designed to lower borrowers’ monthly payments by reducing mortgage rates to as low as 2 percent for five years and extending loan terms up to 40 years. To complete the program, homeowners need to go through a three month trial period and provide proof of their income, plus a letter documenting their financial hardship.”
I’m thinking all these programs have failed b/c people just plain and simple can’t afford the houses they bought during the bubble. They can’t modify the loan b/c the people can’t prove they can make the payments.
For those who can prove they can make the payments, what kind of incentive is a low rate for only 5 years and extending the loan to 40 years. Seems like more temporary band-aids.
March 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM #531236jpinpbParticipantMy favorite line was:
The changes “will better assist responsible homeowners who have been affected by the economic crisis through no fault of their own,” an administration official said.
However, the catch is this:
“The program is designed to lower borrowers’ monthly payments by reducing mortgage rates to as low as 2 percent for five years and extending loan terms up to 40 years. To complete the program, homeowners need to go through a three month trial period and provide proof of their income, plus a letter documenting their financial hardship.”
I’m thinking all these programs have failed b/c people just plain and simple can’t afford the houses they bought during the bubble. They can’t modify the loan b/c the people can’t prove they can make the payments.
For those who can prove they can make the payments, what kind of incentive is a low rate for only 5 years and extending the loan to 40 years. Seems like more temporary band-aids.
March 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM #531834sdrealtorParticipantThat sounds like the HAMP program.
March 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM #531384sdrealtorParticipantThat sounds like the HAMP program.
March 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM #531255sdrealtorParticipantThat sounds like the HAMP program.
March 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM #531933sdrealtorParticipantThat sounds like the HAMP program.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.