Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Gold Redux: What do you folks thing about this?
- This topic has 495 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 31, 2009 at 7:24 PM #408668May 31, 2009 at 7:31 PM #407979Allan from FallbrookParticipant
[quote=flu][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I’m not saying you feel that there will be a wholesale collapse, either, but many of the folks out there shilling gold are. And they’re selling fear along with the coins. That’s why I keep saying that if you read history and find the proper analogies, they’ll lead you to an understanding that many other things possess value as well and will also survive the downturn.[/quote]In your view at the current time right now, what do you think would hold value (aside from precious metals). I don’t think we’ll have a total collapse of the dollar right away, but just curious. (I know you’ll laugh by my relative has a bunch of wine that’s held in an escrow storage, and they have been selling them at wine auctions for pretty hefty premiums even in present day…Unfortunately, I’ve never acquired a wine snobbery so it doesn’t ring a bell for me..) I won’t hold you accountable for your wisdom opinion. [/quote]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.
May 31, 2009 at 7:31 PM #408219Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=flu][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I’m not saying you feel that there will be a wholesale collapse, either, but many of the folks out there shilling gold are. And they’re selling fear along with the coins. That’s why I keep saying that if you read history and find the proper analogies, they’ll lead you to an understanding that many other things possess value as well and will also survive the downturn.[/quote]In your view at the current time right now, what do you think would hold value (aside from precious metals). I don’t think we’ll have a total collapse of the dollar right away, but just curious. (I know you’ll laugh by my relative has a bunch of wine that’s held in an escrow storage, and they have been selling them at wine auctions for pretty hefty premiums even in present day…Unfortunately, I’ve never acquired a wine snobbery so it doesn’t ring a bell for me..) I won’t hold you accountable for your wisdom opinion. [/quote]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.
May 31, 2009 at 7:31 PM #408463Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=flu][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I’m not saying you feel that there will be a wholesale collapse, either, but many of the folks out there shilling gold are. And they’re selling fear along with the coins. That’s why I keep saying that if you read history and find the proper analogies, they’ll lead you to an understanding that many other things possess value as well and will also survive the downturn.[/quote]In your view at the current time right now, what do you think would hold value (aside from precious metals). I don’t think we’ll have a total collapse of the dollar right away, but just curious. (I know you’ll laugh by my relative has a bunch of wine that’s held in an escrow storage, and they have been selling them at wine auctions for pretty hefty premiums even in present day…Unfortunately, I’ve never acquired a wine snobbery so it doesn’t ring a bell for me..) I won’t hold you accountable for your wisdom opinion. [/quote]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.
May 31, 2009 at 7:31 PM #408524Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=flu][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I’m not saying you feel that there will be a wholesale collapse, either, but many of the folks out there shilling gold are. And they’re selling fear along with the coins. That’s why I keep saying that if you read history and find the proper analogies, they’ll lead you to an understanding that many other things possess value as well and will also survive the downturn.[/quote]In your view at the current time right now, what do you think would hold value (aside from precious metals). I don’t think we’ll have a total collapse of the dollar right away, but just curious. (I know you’ll laugh by my relative has a bunch of wine that’s held in an escrow storage, and they have been selling them at wine auctions for pretty hefty premiums even in present day…Unfortunately, I’ve never acquired a wine snobbery so it doesn’t ring a bell for me..) I won’t hold you accountable for your wisdom opinion. [/quote]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.
May 31, 2009 at 7:31 PM #408673Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=flu][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I’m not saying you feel that there will be a wholesale collapse, either, but many of the folks out there shilling gold are. And they’re selling fear along with the coins. That’s why I keep saying that if you read history and find the proper analogies, they’ll lead you to an understanding that many other things possess value as well and will also survive the downturn.[/quote]In your view at the current time right now, what do you think would hold value (aside from precious metals). I don’t think we’ll have a total collapse of the dollar right away, but just curious. (I know you’ll laugh by my relative has a bunch of wine that’s held in an escrow storage, and they have been selling them at wine auctions for pretty hefty premiums even in present day…Unfortunately, I’ve never acquired a wine snobbery so it doesn’t ring a bell for me..) I won’t hold you accountable for your wisdom opinion. [/quote]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.
May 31, 2009 at 8:08 PM #408009ArrayaParticipantAllan-Gold is not bubbling yet, IMO. It decoupled from commodities in the fall and is now PROVEN as a safe haven along with US treasuries. And yes, it’s perception, but a universal one now, that you can deduce from recent behavior. Like a global economic/fiat stress meter. The meme is out there. The treasury safety perception won’t last because our economy is falling to fast with no end in sight. People need something to grab onto and there is no other deal in town today.
Don’t fight the herd, follow it and leave first. Lots more stress coming up and the herd will be flocking to safe havens. Nothing has fundamentals. We are in the twilight zone economically. Personally, I think you can throw historical contexts out the window at this point.
May 31, 2009 at 8:08 PM #408249ArrayaParticipantAllan-Gold is not bubbling yet, IMO. It decoupled from commodities in the fall and is now PROVEN as a safe haven along with US treasuries. And yes, it’s perception, but a universal one now, that you can deduce from recent behavior. Like a global economic/fiat stress meter. The meme is out there. The treasury safety perception won’t last because our economy is falling to fast with no end in sight. People need something to grab onto and there is no other deal in town today.
Don’t fight the herd, follow it and leave first. Lots more stress coming up and the herd will be flocking to safe havens. Nothing has fundamentals. We are in the twilight zone economically. Personally, I think you can throw historical contexts out the window at this point.
May 31, 2009 at 8:08 PM #408493ArrayaParticipantAllan-Gold is not bubbling yet, IMO. It decoupled from commodities in the fall and is now PROVEN as a safe haven along with US treasuries. And yes, it’s perception, but a universal one now, that you can deduce from recent behavior. Like a global economic/fiat stress meter. The meme is out there. The treasury safety perception won’t last because our economy is falling to fast with no end in sight. People need something to grab onto and there is no other deal in town today.
Don’t fight the herd, follow it and leave first. Lots more stress coming up and the herd will be flocking to safe havens. Nothing has fundamentals. We are in the twilight zone economically. Personally, I think you can throw historical contexts out the window at this point.
May 31, 2009 at 8:08 PM #408554ArrayaParticipantAllan-Gold is not bubbling yet, IMO. It decoupled from commodities in the fall and is now PROVEN as a safe haven along with US treasuries. And yes, it’s perception, but a universal one now, that you can deduce from recent behavior. Like a global economic/fiat stress meter. The meme is out there. The treasury safety perception won’t last because our economy is falling to fast with no end in sight. People need something to grab onto and there is no other deal in town today.
Don’t fight the herd, follow it and leave first. Lots more stress coming up and the herd will be flocking to safe havens. Nothing has fundamentals. We are in the twilight zone economically. Personally, I think you can throw historical contexts out the window at this point.
May 31, 2009 at 8:08 PM #408703ArrayaParticipantAllan-Gold is not bubbling yet, IMO. It decoupled from commodities in the fall and is now PROVEN as a safe haven along with US treasuries. And yes, it’s perception, but a universal one now, that you can deduce from recent behavior. Like a global economic/fiat stress meter. The meme is out there. The treasury safety perception won’t last because our economy is falling to fast with no end in sight. People need something to grab onto and there is no other deal in town today.
Don’t fight the herd, follow it and leave first. Lots more stress coming up and the herd will be flocking to safe havens. Nothing has fundamentals. We are in the twilight zone economically. Personally, I think you can throw historical contexts out the window at this point.
May 31, 2009 at 8:42 PM #408041CoronitaParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.[/quote]
Actually that helps. See in my more youthful years, I took the advice of colleagues and friends to try to “speculate” in higher risk items. The rationale was that if I wipe out when I’m young, I still have a ways to go to make up the difference. It sometimes worked, sometimes didn’t. Now, I’m beginning to realize that I’m not as young as I use to be…Hence, I’m starting to think even more cautiously now. There were times when I use to think 4-6% was a joke…I’m not laughing anymore.
May 31, 2009 at 8:42 PM #408280CoronitaParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.[/quote]
Actually that helps. See in my more youthful years, I took the advice of colleagues and friends to try to “speculate” in higher risk items. The rationale was that if I wipe out when I’m young, I still have a ways to go to make up the difference. It sometimes worked, sometimes didn’t. Now, I’m beginning to realize that I’m not as young as I use to be…Hence, I’m starting to think even more cautiously now. There were times when I use to think 4-6% was a joke…I’m not laughing anymore.
May 31, 2009 at 8:42 PM #408523CoronitaParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.[/quote]
Actually that helps. See in my more youthful years, I took the advice of colleagues and friends to try to “speculate” in higher risk items. The rationale was that if I wipe out when I’m young, I still have a ways to go to make up the difference. It sometimes worked, sometimes didn’t. Now, I’m beginning to realize that I’m not as young as I use to be…Hence, I’m starting to think even more cautiously now. There were times when I use to think 4-6% was a joke…I’m not laughing anymore.
May 31, 2009 at 8:42 PM #408586CoronitaParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
FLU: I wish I had an answer, I honestly do. I’m completely out of the market presently, but that’s because every spare dime is going into my business to finance engineering and design costs. Business is booming (no pun intended; I’m in blast engineering), but that’s more a function of the times than anything else.
I’ve got friends in banking, finance and accounting, and all of them are advocating different approaches to investing.
When I invested seriously before (personally and institutionally), I was a devoted advocate of Ben Graham and value investing. I will tell you that I stayed away from stocks religiously and played for years in the bond market. I wasn’t looking to be a world beater, but to maintain a consistent return net of inflation and any costs of funds (institutionally). In this regard, I considered myself successful, generally returning between 4 – 6% total net return.[/quote]
Actually that helps. See in my more youthful years, I took the advice of colleagues and friends to try to “speculate” in higher risk items. The rationale was that if I wipe out when I’m young, I still have a ways to go to make up the difference. It sometimes worked, sometimes didn’t. Now, I’m beginning to realize that I’m not as young as I use to be…Hence, I’m starting to think even more cautiously now. There were times when I use to think 4-6% was a joke…I’m not laughing anymore.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.