Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Gold Redux: What do you folks thing about this?
- This topic has 495 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 31, 2009 at 3:30 PM #408633May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM #407944scaredyclassicParticipant
actualy, now that i think about it, im starting to lose faith in gold.
sell!!!!
disclosure. im talking my book currently and have had largish for me bet on gold …
i dont know if i’d previously discussed, but i think actually the best investment, much better than gold , is to invest in the self. myself is a much better investment. i have been increasing in my income producing value.
if i coudl wring another 5-20 productive years outta me, that’d be a good bet.
forget gold, real estate, wine…I’m going long on me.
not sure exactly how to invest in myself. maybe i’ll go to the doctor, geta haircut, keep the brain nimble, take a vacation, learn to relax, exercise, stop arguing about the value of gold on the internet.
May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM #408184scaredyclassicParticipantactualy, now that i think about it, im starting to lose faith in gold.
sell!!!!
disclosure. im talking my book currently and have had largish for me bet on gold …
i dont know if i’d previously discussed, but i think actually the best investment, much better than gold , is to invest in the self. myself is a much better investment. i have been increasing in my income producing value.
if i coudl wring another 5-20 productive years outta me, that’d be a good bet.
forget gold, real estate, wine…I’m going long on me.
not sure exactly how to invest in myself. maybe i’ll go to the doctor, geta haircut, keep the brain nimble, take a vacation, learn to relax, exercise, stop arguing about the value of gold on the internet.
May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM #408428scaredyclassicParticipantactualy, now that i think about it, im starting to lose faith in gold.
sell!!!!
disclosure. im talking my book currently and have had largish for me bet on gold …
i dont know if i’d previously discussed, but i think actually the best investment, much better than gold , is to invest in the self. myself is a much better investment. i have been increasing in my income producing value.
if i coudl wring another 5-20 productive years outta me, that’d be a good bet.
forget gold, real estate, wine…I’m going long on me.
not sure exactly how to invest in myself. maybe i’ll go to the doctor, geta haircut, keep the brain nimble, take a vacation, learn to relax, exercise, stop arguing about the value of gold on the internet.
May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM #408489scaredyclassicParticipantactualy, now that i think about it, im starting to lose faith in gold.
sell!!!!
disclosure. im talking my book currently and have had largish for me bet on gold …
i dont know if i’d previously discussed, but i think actually the best investment, much better than gold , is to invest in the self. myself is a much better investment. i have been increasing in my income producing value.
if i coudl wring another 5-20 productive years outta me, that’d be a good bet.
forget gold, real estate, wine…I’m going long on me.
not sure exactly how to invest in myself. maybe i’ll go to the doctor, geta haircut, keep the brain nimble, take a vacation, learn to relax, exercise, stop arguing about the value of gold on the internet.
May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM #408638scaredyclassicParticipantactualy, now that i think about it, im starting to lose faith in gold.
sell!!!!
disclosure. im talking my book currently and have had largish for me bet on gold …
i dont know if i’d previously discussed, but i think actually the best investment, much better than gold , is to invest in the self. myself is a much better investment. i have been increasing in my income producing value.
if i coudl wring another 5-20 productive years outta me, that’d be a good bet.
forget gold, real estate, wine…I’m going long on me.
not sure exactly how to invest in myself. maybe i’ll go to the doctor, geta haircut, keep the brain nimble, take a vacation, learn to relax, exercise, stop arguing about the value of gold on the internet.
May 31, 2009 at 3:54 PM #407954peterbParticipantGold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.May 31, 2009 at 3:54 PM #408193peterbParticipantGold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.May 31, 2009 at 3:54 PM #408437peterbParticipantGold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.May 31, 2009 at 3:54 PM #408499peterbParticipantGold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.May 31, 2009 at 3:54 PM #408648peterbParticipantGold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.May 31, 2009 at 7:24 PM #407974Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=peterb]Gold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.[/quote]Peter: I don’t have any issues with gold. What I have an issue with is an asset class being bid up bullishly without any supporting facts (stop me if you’ve heard this one) by supposed “experts” who are using fear to push their product.
Your use of “perceived value” is the key. Gold, throughout history, has simply been one of many things that served as a placeholder for value. Sometimes it was greater than other things, sometimes less.
In terms of investment value, ask anyone that fell into the gold trap that ended in either 1980 or 1982 (I forget which). I was a teenager at the time and my uncle was in investment banking with Merrill Lynch. Gold had emerged as a market beater and people were piling in enthusiastically. Gold went nearly to $900 and then back down into the $200s, where it remained for years upon years. He had been telling clients to be careful, but his advice was ignored.
You hear people on this board and in other investment blogs touting gold and offering “expert” advice that gold will break $2,000 an ounce. Well, I’m wary of experts, especially those who sell fear as a commodity. We’ve all seen how that works out.
May 31, 2009 at 7:24 PM #408214Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=peterb]Gold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.[/quote]Peter: I don’t have any issues with gold. What I have an issue with is an asset class being bid up bullishly without any supporting facts (stop me if you’ve heard this one) by supposed “experts” who are using fear to push their product.
Your use of “perceived value” is the key. Gold, throughout history, has simply been one of many things that served as a placeholder for value. Sometimes it was greater than other things, sometimes less.
In terms of investment value, ask anyone that fell into the gold trap that ended in either 1980 or 1982 (I forget which). I was a teenager at the time and my uncle was in investment banking with Merrill Lynch. Gold had emerged as a market beater and people were piling in enthusiastically. Gold went nearly to $900 and then back down into the $200s, where it remained for years upon years. He had been telling clients to be careful, but his advice was ignored.
You hear people on this board and in other investment blogs touting gold and offering “expert” advice that gold will break $2,000 an ounce. Well, I’m wary of experts, especially those who sell fear as a commodity. We’ve all seen how that works out.
May 31, 2009 at 7:24 PM #408458Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=peterb]Gold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.[/quote]Peter: I don’t have any issues with gold. What I have an issue with is an asset class being bid up bullishly without any supporting facts (stop me if you’ve heard this one) by supposed “experts” who are using fear to push their product.
Your use of “perceived value” is the key. Gold, throughout history, has simply been one of many things that served as a placeholder for value. Sometimes it was greater than other things, sometimes less.
In terms of investment value, ask anyone that fell into the gold trap that ended in either 1980 or 1982 (I forget which). I was a teenager at the time and my uncle was in investment banking with Merrill Lynch. Gold had emerged as a market beater and people were piling in enthusiastically. Gold went nearly to $900 and then back down into the $200s, where it remained for years upon years. He had been telling clients to be careful, but his advice was ignored.
You hear people on this board and in other investment blogs touting gold and offering “expert” advice that gold will break $2,000 an ounce. Well, I’m wary of experts, especially those who sell fear as a commodity. We’ve all seen how that works out.
May 31, 2009 at 7:24 PM #408519Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=peterb]Gold’s been used as money for a long time throughout history, around the world. When fiats fail, they tend to come back to gold. There’s a lot documentation on this. Sure, there are times when there’s some other asset that’s out performing gold. But when the economic climate starts getting sketchy, it’s relative strength is increased. Everything has some kind of purchasing power. So measuring items against a similar group may be a more useful method of determining value. Gold/CRB is one way to calculate it’s real value.
My point about venetian bonds and silk is that they were at sometime in the past an outperforming asset to gold. But today we speak of gold. And we have for many centuries, off and on. Eventhough all kinds of things have come and gone from percieved value.[/quote]Peter: I don’t have any issues with gold. What I have an issue with is an asset class being bid up bullishly without any supporting facts (stop me if you’ve heard this one) by supposed “experts” who are using fear to push their product.
Your use of “perceived value” is the key. Gold, throughout history, has simply been one of many things that served as a placeholder for value. Sometimes it was greater than other things, sometimes less.
In terms of investment value, ask anyone that fell into the gold trap that ended in either 1980 or 1982 (I forget which). I was a teenager at the time and my uncle was in investment banking with Merrill Lynch. Gold had emerged as a market beater and people were piling in enthusiastically. Gold went nearly to $900 and then back down into the $200s, where it remained for years upon years. He had been telling clients to be careful, but his advice was ignored.
You hear people on this board and in other investment blogs touting gold and offering “expert” advice that gold will break $2,000 an ounce. Well, I’m wary of experts, especially those who sell fear as a commodity. We’ve all seen how that works out.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.