Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Getting started with Muli-Family investments
- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by Ren.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 28, 2009 at 5:39 PM #450461August 28, 2009 at 6:27 PM #450275RenParticipant
[quote=jamsvet]I just don’t think that anything now makes economic sense.[/quote]
It depends on the area. Check out Riverside county. Using the 50% rule, there are a lot of profitable properties out there, in decent neighborhoods.
The biggest mistake I’ve seen residential landlords make (over and over and over again) is to get greedy with rent. They charge over market because they’re convinced they have the nicest house on the block, but the only people willing to pay that are the ones with questionable credit. Three months later, they wonder why they always end up with an eviction and damage.
If you pay the right amount for a property, you can charge below market, get well-qualified tenants, and still have very positive cash flow.
August 28, 2009 at 6:27 PM #450875RenParticipant[quote=jamsvet]I just don’t think that anything now makes economic sense.[/quote]
It depends on the area. Check out Riverside county. Using the 50% rule, there are a lot of profitable properties out there, in decent neighborhoods.
The biggest mistake I’ve seen residential landlords make (over and over and over again) is to get greedy with rent. They charge over market because they’re convinced they have the nicest house on the block, but the only people willing to pay that are the ones with questionable credit. Three months later, they wonder why they always end up with an eviction and damage.
If you pay the right amount for a property, you can charge below market, get well-qualified tenants, and still have very positive cash flow.
August 28, 2009 at 6:27 PM #450465RenParticipant[quote=jamsvet]I just don’t think that anything now makes economic sense.[/quote]
It depends on the area. Check out Riverside county. Using the 50% rule, there are a lot of profitable properties out there, in decent neighborhoods.
The biggest mistake I’ve seen residential landlords make (over and over and over again) is to get greedy with rent. They charge over market because they’re convinced they have the nicest house on the block, but the only people willing to pay that are the ones with questionable credit. Three months later, they wonder why they always end up with an eviction and damage.
If you pay the right amount for a property, you can charge below market, get well-qualified tenants, and still have very positive cash flow.
August 28, 2009 at 6:27 PM #450803RenParticipant[quote=jamsvet]I just don’t think that anything now makes economic sense.[/quote]
It depends on the area. Check out Riverside county. Using the 50% rule, there are a lot of profitable properties out there, in decent neighborhoods.
The biggest mistake I’ve seen residential landlords make (over and over and over again) is to get greedy with rent. They charge over market because they’re convinced they have the nicest house on the block, but the only people willing to pay that are the ones with questionable credit. Three months later, they wonder why they always end up with an eviction and damage.
If you pay the right amount for a property, you can charge below market, get well-qualified tenants, and still have very positive cash flow.
August 28, 2009 at 6:27 PM #451063RenParticipant[quote=jamsvet]I just don’t think that anything now makes economic sense.[/quote]
It depends on the area. Check out Riverside county. Using the 50% rule, there are a lot of profitable properties out there, in decent neighborhoods.
The biggest mistake I’ve seen residential landlords make (over and over and over again) is to get greedy with rent. They charge over market because they’re convinced they have the nicest house on the block, but the only people willing to pay that are the ones with questionable credit. Three months later, they wonder why they always end up with an eviction and damage.
If you pay the right amount for a property, you can charge below market, get well-qualified tenants, and still have very positive cash flow.
August 28, 2009 at 10:49 PM #451157jamsvetParticipantI think the number one rule of investment property is don’t buy something that you don’t drive past on your way to work. If you are going to purchase investment property, you have to visit it frequently.
I guess I’m showing my inexperience, what is the 50% rule?
August 28, 2009 at 10:49 PM #450969jamsvetParticipantI think the number one rule of investment property is don’t buy something that you don’t drive past on your way to work. If you are going to purchase investment property, you have to visit it frequently.
I guess I’m showing my inexperience, what is the 50% rule?
August 28, 2009 at 10:49 PM #450367jamsvetParticipantI think the number one rule of investment property is don’t buy something that you don’t drive past on your way to work. If you are going to purchase investment property, you have to visit it frequently.
I guess I’m showing my inexperience, what is the 50% rule?
August 28, 2009 at 10:49 PM #450894jamsvetParticipantI think the number one rule of investment property is don’t buy something that you don’t drive past on your way to work. If you are going to purchase investment property, you have to visit it frequently.
I guess I’m showing my inexperience, what is the 50% rule?
August 28, 2009 at 10:49 PM #450557jamsvetParticipantI think the number one rule of investment property is don’t buy something that you don’t drive past on your way to work. If you are going to purchase investment property, you have to visit it frequently.
I guess I’m showing my inexperience, what is the 50% rule?
August 29, 2009 at 1:54 PM #451324RenParticipantIt’s not inexperience, I don’t think many people go by it. It’s just this – as a general rule, long-term maintenance costs (including vacancies, property management, and major expenses like flooring and roof) run about 40-50% of rental income, not counting the mortgage. If you manage your own property, it’s closer to 40%.
August 29, 2009 at 1:54 PM #450530RenParticipantIt’s not inexperience, I don’t think many people go by it. It’s just this – as a general rule, long-term maintenance costs (including vacancies, property management, and major expenses like flooring and roof) run about 40-50% of rental income, not counting the mortgage. If you manage your own property, it’s closer to 40%.
August 29, 2009 at 1:54 PM #450720RenParticipantIt’s not inexperience, I don’t think many people go by it. It’s just this – as a general rule, long-term maintenance costs (including vacancies, property management, and major expenses like flooring and roof) run about 40-50% of rental income, not counting the mortgage. If you manage your own property, it’s closer to 40%.
August 29, 2009 at 1:54 PM #451133RenParticipantIt’s not inexperience, I don’t think many people go by it. It’s just this – as a general rule, long-term maintenance costs (including vacancies, property management, and major expenses like flooring and roof) run about 40-50% of rental income, not counting the mortgage. If you manage your own property, it’s closer to 40%.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.