- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 12, 2010 at 5:13 PM #630412November 12, 2010 at 5:19 PM #630990UCGalParticipant
When they eliminated the credit card interest deductions people didn’t stop buying stuff on credit.
History – when income tax came into play – the personal income exemption was above the average income… so only above average income folks and businesses paid income tax. The tax code reflected that it was geared towards businesses – since most people did not even have a mortgage. It wasn’t till the end of WWII that mortgages became common.
Prior to that people saved money, borrowed from family, but it was unusual to take a 30 year mortgage.
They’ve eliminated interest deductions for everything BUT homeownership, over time. I don’t think homeownership rates will change dramatically if they eliminate the deduction.
November 12, 2010 at 5:19 PM #631437UCGalParticipantWhen they eliminated the credit card interest deductions people didn’t stop buying stuff on credit.
History – when income tax came into play – the personal income exemption was above the average income… so only above average income folks and businesses paid income tax. The tax code reflected that it was geared towards businesses – since most people did not even have a mortgage. It wasn’t till the end of WWII that mortgages became common.
Prior to that people saved money, borrowed from family, but it was unusual to take a 30 year mortgage.
They’ve eliminated interest deductions for everything BUT homeownership, over time. I don’t think homeownership rates will change dramatically if they eliminate the deduction.
November 12, 2010 at 5:19 PM #630417UCGalParticipantWhen they eliminated the credit card interest deductions people didn’t stop buying stuff on credit.
History – when income tax came into play – the personal income exemption was above the average income… so only above average income folks and businesses paid income tax. The tax code reflected that it was geared towards businesses – since most people did not even have a mortgage. It wasn’t till the end of WWII that mortgages became common.
Prior to that people saved money, borrowed from family, but it was unusual to take a 30 year mortgage.
They’ve eliminated interest deductions for everything BUT homeownership, over time. I don’t think homeownership rates will change dramatically if they eliminate the deduction.
November 12, 2010 at 5:19 PM #630339UCGalParticipantWhen they eliminated the credit card interest deductions people didn’t stop buying stuff on credit.
History – when income tax came into play – the personal income exemption was above the average income… so only above average income folks and businesses paid income tax. The tax code reflected that it was geared towards businesses – since most people did not even have a mortgage. It wasn’t till the end of WWII that mortgages became common.
Prior to that people saved money, borrowed from family, but it was unusual to take a 30 year mortgage.
They’ve eliminated interest deductions for everything BUT homeownership, over time. I don’t think homeownership rates will change dramatically if they eliminate the deduction.
November 12, 2010 at 5:19 PM #631118UCGalParticipantWhen they eliminated the credit card interest deductions people didn’t stop buying stuff on credit.
History – when income tax came into play – the personal income exemption was above the average income… so only above average income folks and businesses paid income tax. The tax code reflected that it was geared towards businesses – since most people did not even have a mortgage. It wasn’t till the end of WWII that mortgages became common.
Prior to that people saved money, borrowed from family, but it was unusual to take a 30 year mortgage.
They’ve eliminated interest deductions for everything BUT homeownership, over time. I don’t think homeownership rates will change dramatically if they eliminate the deduction.
November 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM #630432temeculaguyParticipantThere is another thread going that talks about how that is already somewhat in place because of the AMT which is set to return. If you’ve got the income to have more than a 500k loan, you are likely going to get clobbered anyway. It’s only going to screw California and New York, traditionally blue states, I doubt Obama wants to piss off all the rich democrats. But something like that could pass, it would only hurt certain markets in a few states. 90% of the country would consider people in 700k+ homes as rich, which isn’t really accurate in a few california cities. I wonder what percentage of San Diego has more than 500k loans. A lot of areas have higher than 500k values but that doesn’t always mean they have loans that high.
November 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM #631452temeculaguyParticipantThere is another thread going that talks about how that is already somewhat in place because of the AMT which is set to return. If you’ve got the income to have more than a 500k loan, you are likely going to get clobbered anyway. It’s only going to screw California and New York, traditionally blue states, I doubt Obama wants to piss off all the rich democrats. But something like that could pass, it would only hurt certain markets in a few states. 90% of the country would consider people in 700k+ homes as rich, which isn’t really accurate in a few california cities. I wonder what percentage of San Diego has more than 500k loans. A lot of areas have higher than 500k values but that doesn’t always mean they have loans that high.
November 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM #630354temeculaguyParticipantThere is another thread going that talks about how that is already somewhat in place because of the AMT which is set to return. If you’ve got the income to have more than a 500k loan, you are likely going to get clobbered anyway. It’s only going to screw California and New York, traditionally blue states, I doubt Obama wants to piss off all the rich democrats. But something like that could pass, it would only hurt certain markets in a few states. 90% of the country would consider people in 700k+ homes as rich, which isn’t really accurate in a few california cities. I wonder what percentage of San Diego has more than 500k loans. A lot of areas have higher than 500k values but that doesn’t always mean they have loans that high.
November 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM #631133temeculaguyParticipantThere is another thread going that talks about how that is already somewhat in place because of the AMT which is set to return. If you’ve got the income to have more than a 500k loan, you are likely going to get clobbered anyway. It’s only going to screw California and New York, traditionally blue states, I doubt Obama wants to piss off all the rich democrats. But something like that could pass, it would only hurt certain markets in a few states. 90% of the country would consider people in 700k+ homes as rich, which isn’t really accurate in a few california cities. I wonder what percentage of San Diego has more than 500k loans. A lot of areas have higher than 500k values but that doesn’t always mean they have loans that high.
November 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM #631005temeculaguyParticipantThere is another thread going that talks about how that is already somewhat in place because of the AMT which is set to return. If you’ve got the income to have more than a 500k loan, you are likely going to get clobbered anyway. It’s only going to screw California and New York, traditionally blue states, I doubt Obama wants to piss off all the rich democrats. But something like that could pass, it would only hurt certain markets in a few states. 90% of the country would consider people in 700k+ homes as rich, which isn’t really accurate in a few california cities. I wonder what percentage of San Diego has more than 500k loans. A lot of areas have higher than 500k values but that doesn’t always mean they have loans that high.
November 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM #631143jpinpbParticipantMy bad. I didn’t see the other thread. Thanks. I’ll post there.
November 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM #630364jpinpbParticipantMy bad. I didn’t see the other thread. Thanks. I’ll post there.
November 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM #631015jpinpbParticipantMy bad. I didn’t see the other thread. Thanks. I’ll post there.
November 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM #630442jpinpbParticipantMy bad. I didn’t see the other thread. Thanks. I’ll post there.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.