- This topic has 770 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by rubbieslippers.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2008 at 11:33 AM #204864May 15, 2008 at 11:39 AM #204747anParticipant
If the government feel the need to interfere with the definitely of “marriage” and their reason to ban gay marriage is to protect the sanctity of marriage, then they should also ban divorce as well, since divorce ruin the sanctity of marriage.
May 15, 2008 at 11:39 AM #204794anParticipantIf the government feel the need to interfere with the definitely of “marriage” and their reason to ban gay marriage is to protect the sanctity of marriage, then they should also ban divorce as well, since divorce ruin the sanctity of marriage.
May 15, 2008 at 11:39 AM #204825anParticipantIf the government feel the need to interfere with the definitely of “marriage” and their reason to ban gay marriage is to protect the sanctity of marriage, then they should also ban divorce as well, since divorce ruin the sanctity of marriage.
May 15, 2008 at 11:39 AM #204846anParticipantIf the government feel the need to interfere with the definitely of “marriage” and their reason to ban gay marriage is to protect the sanctity of marriage, then they should also ban divorce as well, since divorce ruin the sanctity of marriage.
May 15, 2008 at 11:39 AM #204880anParticipantIf the government feel the need to interfere with the definitely of “marriage” and their reason to ban gay marriage is to protect the sanctity of marriage, then they should also ban divorce as well, since divorce ruin the sanctity of marriage.
May 15, 2008 at 11:45 AM #204752SK in CVParticipantMarriage is a state institution.
Has been since states began issuing marriage licenses. States use the same word as religion, but neither has the right to claim ownership of that word. (There is nothing “sacred” about the word.) My religion has no problem with Adam and Steve. Time for everyone to get over arrogant superiority syndrome.
Hopefully this landmark decision will encourage another 48 states to follow, along with the repeal of the draconian federal defense of marriage act. This is a great day for those who are comitted to equal rights for all.
May 15, 2008 at 11:45 AM #204798SK in CVParticipantMarriage is a state institution.
Has been since states began issuing marriage licenses. States use the same word as religion, but neither has the right to claim ownership of that word. (There is nothing “sacred” about the word.) My religion has no problem with Adam and Steve. Time for everyone to get over arrogant superiority syndrome.
Hopefully this landmark decision will encourage another 48 states to follow, along with the repeal of the draconian federal defense of marriage act. This is a great day for those who are comitted to equal rights for all.
May 15, 2008 at 11:45 AM #204829SK in CVParticipantMarriage is a state institution.
Has been since states began issuing marriage licenses. States use the same word as religion, but neither has the right to claim ownership of that word. (There is nothing “sacred” about the word.) My religion has no problem with Adam and Steve. Time for everyone to get over arrogant superiority syndrome.
Hopefully this landmark decision will encourage another 48 states to follow, along with the repeal of the draconian federal defense of marriage act. This is a great day for those who are comitted to equal rights for all.
May 15, 2008 at 11:45 AM #204849SK in CVParticipantMarriage is a state institution.
Has been since states began issuing marriage licenses. States use the same word as religion, but neither has the right to claim ownership of that word. (There is nothing “sacred” about the word.) My religion has no problem with Adam and Steve. Time for everyone to get over arrogant superiority syndrome.
Hopefully this landmark decision will encourage another 48 states to follow, along with the repeal of the draconian federal defense of marriage act. This is a great day for those who are comitted to equal rights for all.
May 15, 2008 at 11:45 AM #204886SK in CVParticipantMarriage is a state institution.
Has been since states began issuing marriage licenses. States use the same word as religion, but neither has the right to claim ownership of that word. (There is nothing “sacred” about the word.) My religion has no problem with Adam and Steve. Time for everyone to get over arrogant superiority syndrome.
Hopefully this landmark decision will encourage another 48 states to follow, along with the repeal of the draconian federal defense of marriage act. This is a great day for those who are comitted to equal rights for all.
May 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #204762AnonymousGuestI’m against gay marriage. I don’t think it sends the right message to today’s youth. People can do what they want in private, and they do, but marriage should be between a man and a woman.
May 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #204808AnonymousGuestI’m against gay marriage. I don’t think it sends the right message to today’s youth. People can do what they want in private, and they do, but marriage should be between a man and a woman.
May 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #204841AnonymousGuestI’m against gay marriage. I don’t think it sends the right message to today’s youth. People can do what they want in private, and they do, but marriage should be between a man and a woman.
May 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #204860AnonymousGuestI’m against gay marriage. I don’t think it sends the right message to today’s youth. People can do what they want in private, and they do, but marriage should be between a man and a woman.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.