- This topic has 770 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
rubbieslippers.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM #205249May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM #205130
scaredyclassic
ParticipantThe weirdest thing just happened. I was reading this thread and became gay.
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM #205178ParticipantThe weirdest thing just happened. I was reading this thread and became gay.
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM #205211ParticipantThe weirdest thing just happened. I was reading this thread and became gay.
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM #205232ParticipantThe weirdest thing just happened. I was reading this thread and became gay.
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM #205265ParticipantThe weirdest thing just happened. I was reading this thread and became gay.
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 4:04 PM #205134Anonymous
GuestAlong the same lines, I hope I don’t wake up tomorrow and-“POW!”-find that the gay transformation happened while I slept!
(lmao)
May 15, 2008 at 4:04 PM #205183GuestAlong the same lines, I hope I don’t wake up tomorrow and-“POW!”-find that the gay transformation happened while I slept!
(lmao)
May 15, 2008 at 4:04 PM #205216GuestAlong the same lines, I hope I don’t wake up tomorrow and-“POW!”-find that the gay transformation happened while I slept!
(lmao)
May 15, 2008 at 4:04 PM #205237GuestAlong the same lines, I hope I don’t wake up tomorrow and-“POW!”-find that the gay transformation happened while I slept!
(lmao)
May 15, 2008 at 4:04 PM #205269GuestAlong the same lines, I hope I don’t wake up tomorrow and-“POW!”-find that the gay transformation happened while I slept!
(lmao)
May 15, 2008 at 4:12 PM #205145ParticipantJudges shouldn’t interpret the constitution. It says we’re all entitled to the equal protection of the laws. that should be so clear any idiot can interpret it wihtout any disagreement. Oh wait. Dammit. Nobody’s been able to agree on it for a couple hundred years! Read the constitution. it’s open to interpretation baby…
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 4:12 PM #205193ParticipantJudges shouldn’t interpret the constitution. It says we’re all entitled to the equal protection of the laws. that should be so clear any idiot can interpret it wihtout any disagreement. Oh wait. Dammit. Nobody’s been able to agree on it for a couple hundred years! Read the constitution. it’s open to interpretation baby…
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 4:12 PM #205226ParticipantJudges shouldn’t interpret the constitution. It says we’re all entitled to the equal protection of the laws. that should be so clear any idiot can interpret it wihtout any disagreement. Oh wait. Dammit. Nobody’s been able to agree on it for a couple hundred years! Read the constitution. it’s open to interpretation baby…
Drink Heavily.
May 15, 2008 at 4:12 PM #205247ParticipantJudges shouldn’t interpret the constitution. It says we’re all entitled to the equal protection of the laws. that should be so clear any idiot can interpret it wihtout any disagreement. Oh wait. Dammit. Nobody’s been able to agree on it for a couple hundred years! Read the constitution. it’s open to interpretation baby…
Drink Heavily.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.