Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Founder Of Reaganomics Says That “Without A Revolution, Americans Are History”
- This topic has 285 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 18, 2010 at 9:09 AM #593498August 18, 2010 at 9:34 AM #592467
Arraya
ParticipantSure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
Brian,you can’t frown upon the unsustainable, irrational american financial practices and cheer for the emerging developing nations, when one was needed to fuel the other. Essentially, to be consistent, you have for cheer both. Of course, we call the aggregate american behavior “rational self-interest”
August 18, 2010 at 9:34 AM #592563Arraya
ParticipantSure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
Brian,you can’t frown upon the unsustainable, irrational american financial practices and cheer for the emerging developing nations, when one was needed to fuel the other. Essentially, to be consistent, you have for cheer both. Of course, we call the aggregate american behavior “rational self-interest”
August 18, 2010 at 9:34 AM #593097Arraya
ParticipantSure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
Brian,you can’t frown upon the unsustainable, irrational american financial practices and cheer for the emerging developing nations, when one was needed to fuel the other. Essentially, to be consistent, you have for cheer both. Of course, we call the aggregate american behavior “rational self-interest”
August 18, 2010 at 9:34 AM #593209Arraya
ParticipantSure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
Brian,you can’t frown upon the unsustainable, irrational american financial practices and cheer for the emerging developing nations, when one was needed to fuel the other. Essentially, to be consistent, you have for cheer both. Of course, we call the aggregate american behavior “rational self-interest”
August 18, 2010 at 9:34 AM #593518Arraya
ParticipantSure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
Brian,you can’t frown upon the unsustainable, irrational american financial practices and cheer for the emerging developing nations, when one was needed to fuel the other. Essentially, to be consistent, you have for cheer both. Of course, we call the aggregate american behavior “rational self-interest”
August 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM #592477davelj
Participant[quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.
August 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM #592573davelj
Participant[quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.
August 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM #593108davelj
Participant[quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.
August 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM #593219davelj
Participant[quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.
August 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM #593528davelj
Participant[quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.
August 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM #592497Arraya
Participant[quote=davelj][quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.[/quote]
With the gargantuan mosaic of global statistics, one could see many pictures, depending on how you tilt your head and squint our eyes.
August 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM #592593Arraya
Participant[quote=davelj][quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.[/quote]
With the gargantuan mosaic of global statistics, one could see many pictures, depending on how you tilt your head and squint our eyes.
August 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM #593128Arraya
Participant[quote=davelj][quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.[/quote]
With the gargantuan mosaic of global statistics, one could see many pictures, depending on how you tilt your head and squint our eyes.
August 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM #593239Arraya
Participant[quote=davelj][quote=Arraya]Sure, Dave, global utilitarianism,”the greatest good for the greatest number of people”, is where we are headed.
[/quote]You say that in jest, but the fact remains that overall standards of living are rising quite rapidly in the developing world – which is most of the world on a total population basis. It’s just rising, to a certain extent, at the expense of the middle class in the developed world, which is a pretty small minority of the world’s population. I think what really bothers you is that while all of this is going on wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of the world’s top 1%, a group that’s becoming farther removed from either of the other two groups. But this doesn’t change the fact in my first sentence.[/quote]
With the gargantuan mosaic of global statistics, one could see many pictures, depending on how you tilt your head and squint our eyes.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
