- This topic has 45 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by latesummer2008.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 25, 2008 at 1:43 PM #246989July 26, 2008 at 11:46 AM #247423latesummer2008Participant
Anyone Know Price Per Square Foot changes in S.D. County from June 07 to June 08? It would be very interesting to see. This would correct for the marketing mix of homes being sold and give us a better idea of % declines in housing Year over Year (YOY). That, along with TOTAL SALES VOLUME (TSV) from June 07 to June 08 would paint a clearer picture of current market TRENDS.
If so, chime in and get this ball rolling….
July 26, 2008 at 11:46 AM #247577latesummer2008ParticipantAnyone Know Price Per Square Foot changes in S.D. County from June 07 to June 08? It would be very interesting to see. This would correct for the marketing mix of homes being sold and give us a better idea of % declines in housing Year over Year (YOY). That, along with TOTAL SALES VOLUME (TSV) from June 07 to June 08 would paint a clearer picture of current market TRENDS.
If so, chime in and get this ball rolling….
July 26, 2008 at 11:46 AM #247584latesummer2008ParticipantAnyone Know Price Per Square Foot changes in S.D. County from June 07 to June 08? It would be very interesting to see. This would correct for the marketing mix of homes being sold and give us a better idea of % declines in housing Year over Year (YOY). That, along with TOTAL SALES VOLUME (TSV) from June 07 to June 08 would paint a clearer picture of current market TRENDS.
If so, chime in and get this ball rolling….
July 26, 2008 at 11:46 AM #247641latesummer2008ParticipantAnyone Know Price Per Square Foot changes in S.D. County from June 07 to June 08? It would be very interesting to see. This would correct for the marketing mix of homes being sold and give us a better idea of % declines in housing Year over Year (YOY). That, along with TOTAL SALES VOLUME (TSV) from June 07 to June 08 would paint a clearer picture of current market TRENDS.
If so, chime in and get this ball rolling….
July 26, 2008 at 11:46 AM #247646latesummer2008ParticipantAnyone Know Price Per Square Foot changes in S.D. County from June 07 to June 08? It would be very interesting to see. This would correct for the marketing mix of homes being sold and give us a better idea of % declines in housing Year over Year (YOY). That, along with TOTAL SALES VOLUME (TSV) from June 07 to June 08 would paint a clearer picture of current market TRENDS.
If so, chime in and get this ball rolling….
July 27, 2008 at 8:39 AM #247916latesummer2008ParticipantLa Jolla at $583/sqft for SFRs…… Just saw this in the LA Times this morning. Anyone know what it was last June (2007)?
July 27, 2008 at 8:39 AM #247910latesummer2008ParticipantLa Jolla at $583/sqft for SFRs…… Just saw this in the LA Times this morning. Anyone know what it was last June (2007)?
July 27, 2008 at 8:39 AM #247848latesummer2008ParticipantLa Jolla at $583/sqft for SFRs…… Just saw this in the LA Times this morning. Anyone know what it was last June (2007)?
July 27, 2008 at 8:39 AM #247852latesummer2008ParticipantLa Jolla at $583/sqft for SFRs…… Just saw this in the LA Times this morning. Anyone know what it was last June (2007)?
July 27, 2008 at 8:39 AM #247692latesummer2008ParticipantLa Jolla at $583/sqft for SFRs…… Just saw this in the LA Times this morning. Anyone know what it was last June (2007)?
July 27, 2008 at 9:44 AM #247892sdrealtorParticipant$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.
In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.
Here’s a hypothetical example:
Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.
This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.
Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.
Make sure you get all the important facts.
I hope this makes sense to y’all.
July 27, 2008 at 9:44 AM #247899sdrealtorParticipant$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.
In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.
Here’s a hypothetical example:
Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.
This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.
Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.
Make sure you get all the important facts.
I hope this makes sense to y’all.
July 27, 2008 at 9:44 AM #247738sdrealtorParticipant$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.
In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.
Here’s a hypothetical example:
Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.
This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.
Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.
Make sure you get all the important facts.
I hope this makes sense to y’all.
July 27, 2008 at 9:44 AM #247955sdrealtorParticipant$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.
In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.
Here’s a hypothetical example:
Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.
This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.
Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.
Make sure you get all the important facts.
I hope this makes sense to y’all.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.