- This topic has 220 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 3, 2010 at 6:15 AM #613101October 3, 2010 at 7:56 AM #612053BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipant
I think this is a way for the top 1 percenters to keep those at the bottom from rising up. If people at the bottom are able to stay in their homes and not have to make mortgage payments, then they can survive on welfare and food stamps. The top 1 percenters want those at the bottom to feel guilt as opposed to anger. So far it’s working.
This squeezes the middle class and causes the middle class to direct their anger to those at the bottom (hello Tea Party!) as opposed to those at the top.
October 3, 2010 at 7:56 AM #612141BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantI think this is a way for the top 1 percenters to keep those at the bottom from rising up. If people at the bottom are able to stay in their homes and not have to make mortgage payments, then they can survive on welfare and food stamps. The top 1 percenters want those at the bottom to feel guilt as opposed to anger. So far it’s working.
This squeezes the middle class and causes the middle class to direct their anger to those at the bottom (hello Tea Party!) as opposed to those at the top.
October 3, 2010 at 7:56 AM #612687BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantI think this is a way for the top 1 percenters to keep those at the bottom from rising up. If people at the bottom are able to stay in their homes and not have to make mortgage payments, then they can survive on welfare and food stamps. The top 1 percenters want those at the bottom to feel guilt as opposed to anger. So far it’s working.
This squeezes the middle class and causes the middle class to direct their anger to those at the bottom (hello Tea Party!) as opposed to those at the top.
October 3, 2010 at 7:56 AM #612804BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantI think this is a way for the top 1 percenters to keep those at the bottom from rising up. If people at the bottom are able to stay in their homes and not have to make mortgage payments, then they can survive on welfare and food stamps. The top 1 percenters want those at the bottom to feel guilt as opposed to anger. So far it’s working.
This squeezes the middle class and causes the middle class to direct their anger to those at the bottom (hello Tea Party!) as opposed to those at the top.
October 3, 2010 at 7:56 AM #613121BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantI think this is a way for the top 1 percenters to keep those at the bottom from rising up. If people at the bottom are able to stay in their homes and not have to make mortgage payments, then they can survive on welfare and food stamps. The top 1 percenters want those at the bottom to feel guilt as opposed to anger. So far it’s working.
This squeezes the middle class and causes the middle class to direct their anger to those at the bottom (hello Tea Party!) as opposed to those at the top.
October 3, 2010 at 9:02 AM #612063jimklingeParticipantOn the BofA-holding-back-properties topic, the BofA employee in this video says that they have no intention of holding properties off the market, or renting them. The majority of those sitting by idly are due to clear-title issues.
His comments start at the 5-minute mark, but crank your volume:
October 3, 2010 at 9:02 AM #612150jimklingeParticipantOn the BofA-holding-back-properties topic, the BofA employee in this video says that they have no intention of holding properties off the market, or renting them. The majority of those sitting by idly are due to clear-title issues.
His comments start at the 5-minute mark, but crank your volume:
October 3, 2010 at 9:02 AM #612697jimklingeParticipantOn the BofA-holding-back-properties topic, the BofA employee in this video says that they have no intention of holding properties off the market, or renting them. The majority of those sitting by idly are due to clear-title issues.
His comments start at the 5-minute mark, but crank your volume:
October 3, 2010 at 9:02 AM #612814jimklingeParticipantOn the BofA-holding-back-properties topic, the BofA employee in this video says that they have no intention of holding properties off the market, or renting them. The majority of those sitting by idly are due to clear-title issues.
His comments start at the 5-minute mark, but crank your volume:
October 3, 2010 at 9:02 AM #613131jimklingeParticipantOn the BofA-holding-back-properties topic, the BofA employee in this video says that they have no intention of holding properties off the market, or renting them. The majority of those sitting by idly are due to clear-title issues.
His comments start at the 5-minute mark, but crank your volume:
October 4, 2010 at 6:35 AM #612226ctr70ParticipantYes penalize the banks for making some mistakes on documents. But I hope this country doesn’t continue to reward the idiots who signed up for more house than they could afford buy reducing their principles or giving them their homes back after foreclosure, and then continue to penalize people who PAY their bills and/or did NOT sign up for the $5,000/mo payment back in 2005 by keeping cheap homes off the market that they should be able to buy right now.
I’m so sick of homeowners blaming it on everyone but themselves for signing up for a payment they can’t afford. This whole new culture (encouraged by the Government) of blaming everyone but yourself and trying to weasal out of stuff on technicalities sickens me. Zero personal responsibility left.
Let’s get back to the 2 choices it’s always been, either pay your mortgage that you signed up for, or send the keys back to the bank and get out of the house. If you don’t pay, you should get your butt booted out of the house (with steel toed boots).
October 4, 2010 at 6:35 AM #612313ctr70ParticipantYes penalize the banks for making some mistakes on documents. But I hope this country doesn’t continue to reward the idiots who signed up for more house than they could afford buy reducing their principles or giving them their homes back after foreclosure, and then continue to penalize people who PAY their bills and/or did NOT sign up for the $5,000/mo payment back in 2005 by keeping cheap homes off the market that they should be able to buy right now.
I’m so sick of homeowners blaming it on everyone but themselves for signing up for a payment they can’t afford. This whole new culture (encouraged by the Government) of blaming everyone but yourself and trying to weasal out of stuff on technicalities sickens me. Zero personal responsibility left.
Let’s get back to the 2 choices it’s always been, either pay your mortgage that you signed up for, or send the keys back to the bank and get out of the house. If you don’t pay, you should get your butt booted out of the house (with steel toed boots).
October 4, 2010 at 6:35 AM #612862ctr70ParticipantYes penalize the banks for making some mistakes on documents. But I hope this country doesn’t continue to reward the idiots who signed up for more house than they could afford buy reducing their principles or giving them their homes back after foreclosure, and then continue to penalize people who PAY their bills and/or did NOT sign up for the $5,000/mo payment back in 2005 by keeping cheap homes off the market that they should be able to buy right now.
I’m so sick of homeowners blaming it on everyone but themselves for signing up for a payment they can’t afford. This whole new culture (encouraged by the Government) of blaming everyone but yourself and trying to weasal out of stuff on technicalities sickens me. Zero personal responsibility left.
Let’s get back to the 2 choices it’s always been, either pay your mortgage that you signed up for, or send the keys back to the bank and get out of the house. If you don’t pay, you should get your butt booted out of the house (with steel toed boots).
October 4, 2010 at 6:35 AM #612979ctr70ParticipantYes penalize the banks for making some mistakes on documents. But I hope this country doesn’t continue to reward the idiots who signed up for more house than they could afford buy reducing their principles or giving them their homes back after foreclosure, and then continue to penalize people who PAY their bills and/or did NOT sign up for the $5,000/mo payment back in 2005 by keeping cheap homes off the market that they should be able to buy right now.
I’m so sick of homeowners blaming it on everyone but themselves for signing up for a payment they can’t afford. This whole new culture (encouraged by the Government) of blaming everyone but yourself and trying to weasal out of stuff on technicalities sickens me. Zero personal responsibility left.
Let’s get back to the 2 choices it’s always been, either pay your mortgage that you signed up for, or send the keys back to the bank and get out of the house. If you don’t pay, you should get your butt booted out of the house (with steel toed boots).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.