- This topic has 345 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM #266898September 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM #266603
Eugene
ParticipantJust because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education.
Your abilities to advance through education are limited by your genetics. If you have good genetics, chances are, you already live in an upper-middle-class neighborhood with good schools. If, by some fluke of nature, you’re a bright kid born to white-trash janitor parents, there are magnet schools (Preuss), GATE programs, etc. So, you’re not entirely on your own.
In the perfect world, all children would be segregated by their learning capabilities. So you won’t have a situation where bright kids are bored because they are not challenged enough, and not-so-bright kids aren’t getting proper education because the class as a whole moves too fast for them. The existing scheme where children are segregated by parents’ incomes is not perfect, but it is a big step in the right direction.
September 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM #266821Eugene
ParticipantJust because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education.
Your abilities to advance through education are limited by your genetics. If you have good genetics, chances are, you already live in an upper-middle-class neighborhood with good schools. If, by some fluke of nature, you’re a bright kid born to white-trash janitor parents, there are magnet schools (Preuss), GATE programs, etc. So, you’re not entirely on your own.
In the perfect world, all children would be segregated by their learning capabilities. So you won’t have a situation where bright kids are bored because they are not challenged enough, and not-so-bright kids aren’t getting proper education because the class as a whole moves too fast for them. The existing scheme where children are segregated by parents’ incomes is not perfect, but it is a big step in the right direction.
September 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM #266835Eugene
ParticipantJust because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education.
Your abilities to advance through education are limited by your genetics. If you have good genetics, chances are, you already live in an upper-middle-class neighborhood with good schools. If, by some fluke of nature, you’re a bright kid born to white-trash janitor parents, there are magnet schools (Preuss), GATE programs, etc. So, you’re not entirely on your own.
In the perfect world, all children would be segregated by their learning capabilities. So you won’t have a situation where bright kids are bored because they are not challenged enough, and not-so-bright kids aren’t getting proper education because the class as a whole moves too fast for them. The existing scheme where children are segregated by parents’ incomes is not perfect, but it is a big step in the right direction.
September 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM #266879Eugene
ParticipantJust because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education.
Your abilities to advance through education are limited by your genetics. If you have good genetics, chances are, you already live in an upper-middle-class neighborhood with good schools. If, by some fluke of nature, you’re a bright kid born to white-trash janitor parents, there are magnet schools (Preuss), GATE programs, etc. So, you’re not entirely on your own.
In the perfect world, all children would be segregated by their learning capabilities. So you won’t have a situation where bright kids are bored because they are not challenged enough, and not-so-bright kids aren’t getting proper education because the class as a whole moves too fast for them. The existing scheme where children are segregated by parents’ incomes is not perfect, but it is a big step in the right direction.
September 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM #266913Eugene
ParticipantJust because it’s impossible to make all the schools better, doesn’t mean people have to be stuck in their social-economic wrung without an easier way to advance through education.
Your abilities to advance through education are limited by your genetics. If you have good genetics, chances are, you already live in an upper-middle-class neighborhood with good schools. If, by some fluke of nature, you’re a bright kid born to white-trash janitor parents, there are magnet schools (Preuss), GATE programs, etc. So, you’re not entirely on your own.
In the perfect world, all children would be segregated by their learning capabilities. So you won’t have a situation where bright kids are bored because they are not challenged enough, and not-so-bright kids aren’t getting proper education because the class as a whole moves too fast for them. The existing scheme where children are segregated by parents’ incomes is not perfect, but it is a big step in the right direction.
September 5, 2008 at 3:45 PM #266608Anonymous
GuestThe university system is mostly a mixture of choice by merit and choice by money. The private K-12 is similar. There are also merit-based programs within the public school, especially high school.
Neither you or Mr. McCain is proposing anything to help the social-economically disadvantaged students to perform better.
The competition does exist in public school. You just vote with where you live. Are you suggesting to use a merit based system to decide who goes to which public elementary school? I don’t think it is a bad idea but it will not happen.
September 5, 2008 at 3:45 PM #266826Anonymous
GuestThe university system is mostly a mixture of choice by merit and choice by money. The private K-12 is similar. There are also merit-based programs within the public school, especially high school.
Neither you or Mr. McCain is proposing anything to help the social-economically disadvantaged students to perform better.
The competition does exist in public school. You just vote with where you live. Are you suggesting to use a merit based system to decide who goes to which public elementary school? I don’t think it is a bad idea but it will not happen.
September 5, 2008 at 3:45 PM #266840Anonymous
GuestThe university system is mostly a mixture of choice by merit and choice by money. The private K-12 is similar. There are also merit-based programs within the public school, especially high school.
Neither you or Mr. McCain is proposing anything to help the social-economically disadvantaged students to perform better.
The competition does exist in public school. You just vote with where you live. Are you suggesting to use a merit based system to decide who goes to which public elementary school? I don’t think it is a bad idea but it will not happen.
September 5, 2008 at 3:45 PM #266884Anonymous
GuestThe university system is mostly a mixture of choice by merit and choice by money. The private K-12 is similar. There are also merit-based programs within the public school, especially high school.
Neither you or Mr. McCain is proposing anything to help the social-economically disadvantaged students to perform better.
The competition does exist in public school. You just vote with where you live. Are you suggesting to use a merit based system to decide who goes to which public elementary school? I don’t think it is a bad idea but it will not happen.
September 5, 2008 at 3:45 PM #266918Anonymous
GuestThe university system is mostly a mixture of choice by merit and choice by money. The private K-12 is similar. There are also merit-based programs within the public school, especially high school.
Neither you or Mr. McCain is proposing anything to help the social-economically disadvantaged students to perform better.
The competition does exist in public school. You just vote with where you live. Are you suggesting to use a merit based system to decide who goes to which public elementary school? I don’t think it is a bad idea but it will not happen.
September 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM #266613temeculaguy
ParticipantI think goldfish best represents what I was trying to point out earlier. Let go of your personal feeling about schools and just understand that API is not about teachers or schools, they have no magic tricks to teach, they have better students. Not smarter students but kids from more educated parents, so their vocabulary benefits by osmosis and the values instilled are different.
API doesn’t mean the school is better, it means the neigborhood is.
Cardiff, Texas football is an entirely different animal and in no way can my theory be extended to include Texas. It is one of the few places in the world where a town’s identity and pride is directly tied to it’s high school team, more so than professional or college teams. It is also probably the only thing I envy about Texas but I don’t think that phenomena will spread here, it’s a Texas thing.
September 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM #266831temeculaguy
ParticipantI think goldfish best represents what I was trying to point out earlier. Let go of your personal feeling about schools and just understand that API is not about teachers or schools, they have no magic tricks to teach, they have better students. Not smarter students but kids from more educated parents, so their vocabulary benefits by osmosis and the values instilled are different.
API doesn’t mean the school is better, it means the neigborhood is.
Cardiff, Texas football is an entirely different animal and in no way can my theory be extended to include Texas. It is one of the few places in the world where a town’s identity and pride is directly tied to it’s high school team, more so than professional or college teams. It is also probably the only thing I envy about Texas but I don’t think that phenomena will spread here, it’s a Texas thing.
September 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM #266845temeculaguy
ParticipantI think goldfish best represents what I was trying to point out earlier. Let go of your personal feeling about schools and just understand that API is not about teachers or schools, they have no magic tricks to teach, they have better students. Not smarter students but kids from more educated parents, so their vocabulary benefits by osmosis and the values instilled are different.
API doesn’t mean the school is better, it means the neigborhood is.
Cardiff, Texas football is an entirely different animal and in no way can my theory be extended to include Texas. It is one of the few places in the world where a town’s identity and pride is directly tied to it’s high school team, more so than professional or college teams. It is also probably the only thing I envy about Texas but I don’t think that phenomena will spread here, it’s a Texas thing.
September 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM #266890temeculaguy
ParticipantI think goldfish best represents what I was trying to point out earlier. Let go of your personal feeling about schools and just understand that API is not about teachers or schools, they have no magic tricks to teach, they have better students. Not smarter students but kids from more educated parents, so their vocabulary benefits by osmosis and the values instilled are different.
API doesn’t mean the school is better, it means the neigborhood is.
Cardiff, Texas football is an entirely different animal and in no way can my theory be extended to include Texas. It is one of the few places in the world where a town’s identity and pride is directly tied to it’s high school team, more so than professional or college teams. It is also probably the only thing I envy about Texas but I don’t think that phenomena will spread here, it’s a Texas thing.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.