- This topic has 295 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by
larrylujack.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 9, 2008 at 12:09 PM #183669April 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #183632
jpinpb
ParticipantThis is begging the question. If my rent equals what a mortgage is, then I would just buy rather than rent. For me, the whole point of renting is I’m saving money rather than buying right now anyway.
April 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #183646jpinpb
ParticipantThis is begging the question. If my rent equals what a mortgage is, then I would just buy rather than rent. For me, the whole point of renting is I’m saving money rather than buying right now anyway.
April 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #183673jpinpb
ParticipantThis is begging the question. If my rent equals what a mortgage is, then I would just buy rather than rent. For me, the whole point of renting is I’m saving money rather than buying right now anyway.
April 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #183679jpinpb
ParticipantThis is begging the question. If my rent equals what a mortgage is, then I would just buy rather than rent. For me, the whole point of renting is I’m saving money rather than buying right now anyway.
April 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #183684jpinpb
ParticipantThis is begging the question. If my rent equals what a mortgage is, then I would just buy rather than rent. For me, the whole point of renting is I’m saving money rather than buying right now anyway.
April 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM #183637NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe AN is right. I think it should be worth not much more than a much smaller one in the same area is worth. This condition is establishing itself in Chula Vista and Temecula. I think it should be a smaller premium to those around it,especially single story with bigger lots, since they enjoy the same location ammenities. $800k could be a good floor if the smaller homes are done falling,not likely. I like Poway and RP for holding power of more average houses, not absolute but relative.
This one might get bid up but I think it could go for 700k, or less, in the future re-adjsuted for future evidence of course(next 6 to 12 months). I want to say 500K but I might be imposing my value perceptions a little much!April 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM #183651NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe AN is right. I think it should be worth not much more than a much smaller one in the same area is worth. This condition is establishing itself in Chula Vista and Temecula. I think it should be a smaller premium to those around it,especially single story with bigger lots, since they enjoy the same location ammenities. $800k could be a good floor if the smaller homes are done falling,not likely. I like Poway and RP for holding power of more average houses, not absolute but relative.
This one might get bid up but I think it could go for 700k, or less, in the future re-adjsuted for future evidence of course(next 6 to 12 months). I want to say 500K but I might be imposing my value perceptions a little much!April 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM #183678NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe AN is right. I think it should be worth not much more than a much smaller one in the same area is worth. This condition is establishing itself in Chula Vista and Temecula. I think it should be a smaller premium to those around it,especially single story with bigger lots, since they enjoy the same location ammenities. $800k could be a good floor if the smaller homes are done falling,not likely. I like Poway and RP for holding power of more average houses, not absolute but relative.
This one might get bid up but I think it could go for 700k, or less, in the future re-adjsuted for future evidence of course(next 6 to 12 months). I want to say 500K but I might be imposing my value perceptions a little much!April 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM #183685NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe AN is right. I think it should be worth not much more than a much smaller one in the same area is worth. This condition is establishing itself in Chula Vista and Temecula. I think it should be a smaller premium to those around it,especially single story with bigger lots, since they enjoy the same location ammenities. $800k could be a good floor if the smaller homes are done falling,not likely. I like Poway and RP for holding power of more average houses, not absolute but relative.
This one might get bid up but I think it could go for 700k, or less, in the future re-adjsuted for future evidence of course(next 6 to 12 months). I want to say 500K but I might be imposing my value perceptions a little much!April 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM #183690NotCranky
ParticipantMaybe AN is right. I think it should be worth not much more than a much smaller one in the same area is worth. This condition is establishing itself in Chula Vista and Temecula. I think it should be a smaller premium to those around it,especially single story with bigger lots, since they enjoy the same location ammenities. $800k could be a good floor if the smaller homes are done falling,not likely. I like Poway and RP for holding power of more average houses, not absolute but relative.
This one might get bid up but I think it could go for 700k, or less, in the future re-adjsuted for future evidence of course(next 6 to 12 months). I want to say 500K but I might be imposing my value perceptions a little much!April 9, 2008 at 12:24 PM #183647an
Participantjpinpb, I completely agree. That’s why it’s getting really hard to sign another year lease when your rent is equal to mortgage w/out any down payment. I’m speculating that waiting another year will yield a saving due to price decline, but that in itself is a speculation, which is the same as those who bought in 2003 speculating it’ll continue to go up.
April 9, 2008 at 12:24 PM #183661an
Participantjpinpb, I completely agree. That’s why it’s getting really hard to sign another year lease when your rent is equal to mortgage w/out any down payment. I’m speculating that waiting another year will yield a saving due to price decline, but that in itself is a speculation, which is the same as those who bought in 2003 speculating it’ll continue to go up.
April 9, 2008 at 12:24 PM #183688an
Participantjpinpb, I completely agree. That’s why it’s getting really hard to sign another year lease when your rent is equal to mortgage w/out any down payment. I’m speculating that waiting another year will yield a saving due to price decline, but that in itself is a speculation, which is the same as those who bought in 2003 speculating it’ll continue to go up.
April 9, 2008 at 12:24 PM #183694an
Participantjpinpb, I completely agree. That’s why it’s getting really hard to sign another year lease when your rent is equal to mortgage w/out any down payment. I’m speculating that waiting another year will yield a saving due to price decline, but that in itself is a speculation, which is the same as those who bought in 2003 speculating it’ll continue to go up.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
