- This topic has 295 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by larrylujack.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 9, 2008 at 12:41 PM #183735April 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM #183687jpinpbParticipant
Rustico – I suck at math. Can you give an example w/numbers what you mean w/the 8%.
I love you math wizards, BTW. My greatest admiration to you all. I just have a little common sense, but suffer and struggle in the math department. Somehow I manage. Maybe just luck saving me.
April 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM #183701jpinpbParticipantRustico – I suck at math. Can you give an example w/numbers what you mean w/the 8%.
I love you math wizards, BTW. My greatest admiration to you all. I just have a little common sense, but suffer and struggle in the math department. Somehow I manage. Maybe just luck saving me.
April 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM #183728jpinpbParticipantRustico – I suck at math. Can you give an example w/numbers what you mean w/the 8%.
I love you math wizards, BTW. My greatest admiration to you all. I just have a little common sense, but suffer and struggle in the math department. Somehow I manage. Maybe just luck saving me.
April 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM #183734jpinpbParticipantRustico – I suck at math. Can you give an example w/numbers what you mean w/the 8%.
I love you math wizards, BTW. My greatest admiration to you all. I just have a little common sense, but suffer and struggle in the math department. Somehow I manage. Maybe just luck saving me.
April 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM #183740jpinpbParticipantRustico – I suck at math. Can you give an example w/numbers what you mean w/the 8%.
I love you math wizards, BTW. My greatest admiration to you all. I just have a little common sense, but suffer and struggle in the math department. Somehow I manage. Maybe just luck saving me.
April 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM #183697anParticipantjpinpb, now looking back at 2003, you can say that some were making “informed” speculation as well. If you look at the data back then, rates were extremely low, price were only above rent by a little bit, all the easy $ start to come in, economy was just exiting a recession, etc. All the variables were the inverse of what it is now. The main point is, price was near fundamental, which is rent.
April 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM #183711anParticipantjpinpb, now looking back at 2003, you can say that some were making “informed” speculation as well. If you look at the data back then, rates were extremely low, price were only above rent by a little bit, all the easy $ start to come in, economy was just exiting a recession, etc. All the variables were the inverse of what it is now. The main point is, price was near fundamental, which is rent.
April 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM #183738anParticipantjpinpb, now looking back at 2003, you can say that some were making “informed” speculation as well. If you look at the data back then, rates were extremely low, price were only above rent by a little bit, all the easy $ start to come in, economy was just exiting a recession, etc. All the variables were the inverse of what it is now. The main point is, price was near fundamental, which is rent.
April 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM #183746anParticipantjpinpb, now looking back at 2003, you can say that some were making “informed” speculation as well. If you look at the data back then, rates were extremely low, price were only above rent by a little bit, all the easy $ start to come in, economy was just exiting a recession, etc. All the variables were the inverse of what it is now. The main point is, price was near fundamental, which is rent.
April 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM #183749anParticipantjpinpb, now looking back at 2003, you can say that some were making “informed” speculation as well. If you look at the data back then, rates were extremely low, price were only above rent by a little bit, all the easy $ start to come in, economy was just exiting a recession, etc. All the variables were the inverse of what it is now. The main point is, price was near fundamental, which is rent.
April 9, 2008 at 1:01 PM #183702jpinpbParticipantOk. When the debt to income ratio is so out of whack and income is not even close to really paying for a house, it is speculation. The only information you have is rates are low and the possibility, which I think everyone will agree, that eventually the rates will rise. To speculate that rates would not rise is not being “informed” but stupid and/or ignorant and gamblig. To assume that one would continue to flip indefinitely, has never played musical chairs as a child.
I repeatedly have said, I do not have any kind of special degrees and the first to say my forte is not math, but even I saw that the subprime could only go one place, a very bad place. Until I came upon this board, I felt like I was the only one against the grain, refusing to succomb to this subprime insane train that everyone was eager to board, defying all logic.
My amazement is only that the ride lasted so long. And now I think the only amazement will be the reverse process.
I am sorry, but I disagree. I do not think there was any “informed” speculation. Only folly.
April 9, 2008 at 1:01 PM #183716jpinpbParticipantOk. When the debt to income ratio is so out of whack and income is not even close to really paying for a house, it is speculation. The only information you have is rates are low and the possibility, which I think everyone will agree, that eventually the rates will rise. To speculate that rates would not rise is not being “informed” but stupid and/or ignorant and gamblig. To assume that one would continue to flip indefinitely, has never played musical chairs as a child.
I repeatedly have said, I do not have any kind of special degrees and the first to say my forte is not math, but even I saw that the subprime could only go one place, a very bad place. Until I came upon this board, I felt like I was the only one against the grain, refusing to succomb to this subprime insane train that everyone was eager to board, defying all logic.
My amazement is only that the ride lasted so long. And now I think the only amazement will be the reverse process.
I am sorry, but I disagree. I do not think there was any “informed” speculation. Only folly.
April 9, 2008 at 1:01 PM #183743jpinpbParticipantOk. When the debt to income ratio is so out of whack and income is not even close to really paying for a house, it is speculation. The only information you have is rates are low and the possibility, which I think everyone will agree, that eventually the rates will rise. To speculate that rates would not rise is not being “informed” but stupid and/or ignorant and gamblig. To assume that one would continue to flip indefinitely, has never played musical chairs as a child.
I repeatedly have said, I do not have any kind of special degrees and the first to say my forte is not math, but even I saw that the subprime could only go one place, a very bad place. Until I came upon this board, I felt like I was the only one against the grain, refusing to succomb to this subprime insane train that everyone was eager to board, defying all logic.
My amazement is only that the ride lasted so long. And now I think the only amazement will be the reverse process.
I am sorry, but I disagree. I do not think there was any “informed” speculation. Only folly.
April 9, 2008 at 1:01 PM #183751jpinpbParticipantOk. When the debt to income ratio is so out of whack and income is not even close to really paying for a house, it is speculation. The only information you have is rates are low and the possibility, which I think everyone will agree, that eventually the rates will rise. To speculate that rates would not rise is not being “informed” but stupid and/or ignorant and gamblig. To assume that one would continue to flip indefinitely, has never played musical chairs as a child.
I repeatedly have said, I do not have any kind of special degrees and the first to say my forte is not math, but even I saw that the subprime could only go one place, a very bad place. Until I came upon this board, I felt like I was the only one against the grain, refusing to succomb to this subprime insane train that everyone was eager to board, defying all logic.
My amazement is only that the ride lasted so long. And now I think the only amazement will be the reverse process.
I am sorry, but I disagree. I do not think there was any “informed” speculation. Only folly.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.