- This topic has 140 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by Cube.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2010 at 1:03 PM #522747March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #521829NotCrankyParticipant
Back on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #521968NotCrankyParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #522399NotCrankyParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #522493NotCrankyParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #522752NotCrankyParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #521839AecetiaParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #521978AecetiaParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #522409AecetiaParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #522503AecetiaParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #522762AecetiaParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #521848NotCrankyParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #521988NotCrankyParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #522419NotCrankyParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #522513NotCrankyParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.