- This topic has 140 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
Cube.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2010 at 1:03 PM #522747March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #521829
NotCranky
ParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #521968NotCranky
ParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #522399NotCranky
ParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #522493NotCranky
ParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM #522752NotCranky
ParticipantBack on the water… By comaprision to the well costs, water districts were charging between 5K to 15K for a meter to a undeveloped lot in their district. If the water line had to be extended, whoever was developing the lot had to do that.They were on the hook for Fire hydrant lines too in some cases.Then you have a water bill
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #521839Aecetia
ParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #521978Aecetia
ParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #522409Aecetia
ParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #522503Aecetia
ParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM #522762Aecetia
ParticipantI live in an association with some landscaped areas that have lawns, trees, paths and barbecues. We have three wells to pay for the landscape which works pretty well. Unfortunately, during the drought, the Indian wells that were dug (super wells) took most of the water. I am all for self-sufficiency and would like a windmill if we could have it.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #521848NotCranky
ParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #521988NotCranky
ParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #522419NotCranky
ParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
March 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM #522513NotCranky
ParticipantAecetia,
Have you installed ballasted flourescent lights? I guess some people don’t like the light they make, but they do save lots of energy.I know if you have fancy fixtures the conversion is very expensive to get nice replacements. In my case the simple, big box retail ones are good enough and are very inexpensive.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
