- This topic has 65 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 7, 2008 at 10:02 AM #300961November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #300991
Aecetia
Participant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301350Aecetia
Participant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301358Aecetia
Participant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301374Aecetia
Participant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301427Aecetia
Participant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301477nostradamus
ParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301041nostradamus
ParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301400nostradamus
ParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301408nostradamus
ParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301424nostradamus
ParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301488CardiffBaseball
ParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301480CardiffBaseball
ParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301504CardiffBaseball
ParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301557CardiffBaseball
ParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.