- This topic has 65 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 7, 2008 at 10:02 AM #300961November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #300991AecetiaParticipant
“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301350AecetiaParticipant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301358AecetiaParticipant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301374AecetiaParticipant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 10:28 AM #301427AecetiaParticipant“Taft was the fattest President. He was so severely overweight to the point that he became stuck in the bathtub in the White House several times, prompting the installation of a new bathtub capable of holding all of the men who installed it- a truth the White House denied until it was torn out years later. At 6 feet, and weighing over 350 pounds (159 kg), Taft was the heaviest President.(Jefferson, Lincoln, Johnson and Clinton were taller).”
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301477nostradamusParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301041nostradamusParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301400nostradamusParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301408nostradamusParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM #301424nostradamusParticipantCardiff are you talking about Misty May? A gold medalist, her photo was the most downloaded internet photo in 2004…
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301488CardiffBaseballParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301480CardiffBaseballParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301504CardiffBaseballParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
November 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM #301557CardiffBaseballParticipantNostra yes, and for the record I do not find her to be all that pretty, not ugly either just not those stunning facial features we associate with the super attractive types.. Yet she is incredibly appealing. Now this 2004 picture, she looks to have it all covered.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.