- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 18, 2010 at 5:10 PM #515217February 18, 2010 at 5:49 PM #515580
Eugene
ParticipantWhat expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.
February 18, 2010 at 5:49 PM #515247Eugene
ParticipantWhat expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.
February 18, 2010 at 5:49 PM #515335Eugene
ParticipantWhat expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.
February 18, 2010 at 5:49 PM #514686Eugene
ParticipantWhat expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.
February 18, 2010 at 5:49 PM #514828Eugene
ParticipantWhat expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.
February 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM #514953capeman
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Yea I think they would have a hard time doing that at 15 or 20 % unemployment.[/quote]
We’re already at 15 or 20%. Look at U-6.
Fed didn’t do anything but turn the knob to make their number look like the real number the market has been pushing for weeks. Rate’s will go up until more people get scared back into Ts. Euro fall could be the catalyst in the near term.
February 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM #515705capeman
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Yea I think they would have a hard time doing that at 15 or 20 % unemployment.[/quote]
We’re already at 15 or 20%. Look at U-6.
Fed didn’t do anything but turn the knob to make their number look like the real number the market has been pushing for weeks. Rate’s will go up until more people get scared back into Ts. Euro fall could be the catalyst in the near term.
February 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM #515371capeman
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Yea I think they would have a hard time doing that at 15 or 20 % unemployment.[/quote]
We’re already at 15 or 20%. Look at U-6.
Fed didn’t do anything but turn the knob to make their number look like the real number the market has been pushing for weeks. Rate’s will go up until more people get scared back into Ts. Euro fall could be the catalyst in the near term.
February 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM #514809capeman
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Yea I think they would have a hard time doing that at 15 or 20 % unemployment.[/quote]
We’re already at 15 or 20%. Look at U-6.
Fed didn’t do anything but turn the knob to make their number look like the real number the market has been pushing for weeks. Rate’s will go up until more people get scared back into Ts. Euro fall could be the catalyst in the near term.
February 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM #515459capeman
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Yea I think they would have a hard time doing that at 15 or 20 % unemployment.[/quote]
We’re already at 15 or 20%. Look at U-6.
Fed didn’t do anything but turn the knob to make their number look like the real number the market has been pushing for weeks. Rate’s will go up until more people get scared back into Ts. Euro fall could be the catalyst in the near term.
February 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM #514978temeculaguy
Participant[quote=Eugene]What expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.[/quote]
Good old cnbc, they modified the article from what was originally posted.
Now it says that the guy they interviewed expects the march meeting to result in a raise and initially it said “widely believed.” I didn’t look at the current betting line and apparently after it was posted, the editor did.
February 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM #515730temeculaguy
Participant[quote=Eugene]What expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.[/quote]
Good old cnbc, they modified the article from what was originally posted.
Now it says that the guy they interviewed expects the march meeting to result in a raise and initially it said “widely believed.” I didn’t look at the current betting line and apparently after it was posted, the editor did.
February 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM #515395temeculaguy
Participant[quote=Eugene]What expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.[/quote]
Good old cnbc, they modified the article from what was originally posted.
Now it says that the guy they interviewed expects the march meeting to result in a raise and initially it said “widely believed.” I didn’t look at the current betting line and apparently after it was posted, the editor did.
February 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM #514834temeculaguy
Participant[quote=Eugene]What expected march tick up in the fed funds rate? We’re still strongly up against the zero bound. Current market expectations are for the first tick up (to 0.5%) to occur either in September or in November.[/quote]
Good old cnbc, they modified the article from what was originally posted.
Now it says that the guy they interviewed expects the march meeting to result in a raise and initially it said “widely believed.” I didn’t look at the current betting line and apparently after it was posted, the editor did.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.