Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Elimination of Mortgage Deduction
- This topic has 230 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 25, 2010 at 1:07 PM #18115October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #622496
Coronita
Participantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #622579Coronita
Participantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #623140Coronita
Participantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #623264Coronita
Participantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #623582Coronita
Participantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #622501SD Transplant
ParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #622584SD Transplant
ParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #623145SD Transplant
ParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #623269SD Transplant
ParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #623587SD Transplant
ParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #622516davelj
ParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #622599davelj
ParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #623160davelj
ParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #623284davelj
ParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.