Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Elimination of Mortgage Deduction
- This topic has 230 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 25, 2010 at 1:07 PM #18115October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #622496CoronitaParticipant
ain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #622579CoronitaParticipantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #623140CoronitaParticipantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #623264CoronitaParticipantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:17 PM #623582CoronitaParticipantain’t gonna happen.
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #622501SD TransplantParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #622584SD TransplantParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #623145SD TransplantParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #623269SD TransplantParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM #623587SD TransplantParticipantI’ve heard the child deduction is in the package as well….
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #622516daveljParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #622599daveljParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #623160daveljParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
October 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM #623284daveljParticipantNot gonna happen anytime soon, at least. But even if they try to start phasing it out in, say, five years or so (presumably after housing has stabilized) you still have the issue of how many folks benefit from it (homeowners with mortgages) versus how many folks don’t (renters and homeowners with no mortgage). I think it’s possible several years down the road, but it’s a tough sell when over half of all households benefit from it on net basis. I don’t see a lot of politicians jumping on this bandwagon, but… what is more likely is a lower cap on the deduction, such that only the folks with the largest mortgages are getting penalized. Democracy being what it is, that could pass.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.