- This topic has 350 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by cabal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM #478462November 4, 2009 at 8:31 PM #477748briansd1Guest
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
The sneering condescension, the hypocrisy and sanctimony is enough to make you retch.
[/quote]I learned that from the Catholic church ladies, especially the sanctimony part. π
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Hence, the use of terms like “prescience” (which is better than “omniscience” I suppose), which would be laughable if not so unutterably sad.[/quote]It seems to me that omniscience better applies to the Christian conservatives. After all they believe that they don’t need to learn anything new since everything is in the Bible.
I guess that’s why they want to “conserve” and home-school their children in creationism.
November 4, 2009 at 8:31 PM #477919briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
The sneering condescension, the hypocrisy and sanctimony is enough to make you retch.
[/quote]I learned that from the Catholic church ladies, especially the sanctimony part. π
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Hence, the use of terms like “prescience” (which is better than “omniscience” I suppose), which would be laughable if not so unutterably sad.[/quote]It seems to me that omniscience better applies to the Christian conservatives. After all they believe that they don’t need to learn anything new since everything is in the Bible.
I guess that’s why they want to “conserve” and home-school their children in creationism.
November 4, 2009 at 8:31 PM #478288briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
The sneering condescension, the hypocrisy and sanctimony is enough to make you retch.
[/quote]I learned that from the Catholic church ladies, especially the sanctimony part. π
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Hence, the use of terms like “prescience” (which is better than “omniscience” I suppose), which would be laughable if not so unutterably sad.[/quote]It seems to me that omniscience better applies to the Christian conservatives. After all they believe that they don’t need to learn anything new since everything is in the Bible.
I guess that’s why they want to “conserve” and home-school their children in creationism.
November 4, 2009 at 8:31 PM #478368briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
The sneering condescension, the hypocrisy and sanctimony is enough to make you retch.
[/quote]I learned that from the Catholic church ladies, especially the sanctimony part. π
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Hence, the use of terms like “prescience” (which is better than “omniscience” I suppose), which would be laughable if not so unutterably sad.[/quote]It seems to me that omniscience better applies to the Christian conservatives. After all they believe that they don’t need to learn anything new since everything is in the Bible.
I guess that’s why they want to “conserve” and home-school their children in creationism.
November 4, 2009 at 8:31 PM #478586briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
The sneering condescension, the hypocrisy and sanctimony is enough to make you retch.
[/quote]I learned that from the Catholic church ladies, especially the sanctimony part. π
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Hence, the use of terms like “prescience” (which is better than “omniscience” I suppose), which would be laughable if not so unutterably sad.[/quote]It seems to me that omniscience better applies to the Christian conservatives. After all they believe that they don’t need to learn anything new since everything is in the Bible.
I guess that’s why they want to “conserve” and home-school their children in creationism.
November 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM #478187CardiffBaseballParticipantC’mon Brian there are such a small number of people who match up to your stereotype of knuckle-dragging mouthbreaters, who breed and keep their kids ignorant. Every church I’ve ever been in including here in SD was full of very successful, well-educated professionals.
November 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM #478357CardiffBaseballParticipantC’mon Brian there are such a small number of people who match up to your stereotype of knuckle-dragging mouthbreaters, who breed and keep their kids ignorant. Every church I’ve ever been in including here in SD was full of very successful, well-educated professionals.
November 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM #478721CardiffBaseballParticipantC’mon Brian there are such a small number of people who match up to your stereotype of knuckle-dragging mouthbreaters, who breed and keep their kids ignorant. Every church I’ve ever been in including here in SD was full of very successful, well-educated professionals.
November 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM #478804CardiffBaseballParticipantC’mon Brian there are such a small number of people who match up to your stereotype of knuckle-dragging mouthbreaters, who breed and keep their kids ignorant. Every church I’ve ever been in including here in SD was full of very successful, well-educated professionals.
November 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM #479022CardiffBaseballParticipantC’mon Brian there are such a small number of people who match up to your stereotype of knuckle-dragging mouthbreaters, who breed and keep their kids ignorant. Every church I’ve ever been in including here in SD was full of very successful, well-educated professionals.
November 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM #478197surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]We shall see in 2010….
I was an Obama supporter from the beginning when the majority didn’t give him a chance of even beating Hillary. So guess who has more prescience?
[/quote]For those of us who have known of how little substance Obama had and has proven to have (a fact that even you have alluded to), it just shows that you have been one of the first to have the wool pulled over your eyes, that’s all.
November 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM #478366surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]We shall see in 2010….
I was an Obama supporter from the beginning when the majority didn’t give him a chance of even beating Hillary. So guess who has more prescience?
[/quote]For those of us who have known of how little substance Obama had and has proven to have (a fact that even you have alluded to), it just shows that you have been one of the first to have the wool pulled over your eyes, that’s all.
November 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM #478731surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]We shall see in 2010….
I was an Obama supporter from the beginning when the majority didn’t give him a chance of even beating Hillary. So guess who has more prescience?
[/quote]For those of us who have known of how little substance Obama had and has proven to have (a fact that even you have alluded to), it just shows that you have been one of the first to have the wool pulled over your eyes, that’s all.
November 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM #478814surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]We shall see in 2010….
I was an Obama supporter from the beginning when the majority didn’t give him a chance of even beating Hillary. So guess who has more prescience?
[/quote]For those of us who have known of how little substance Obama had and has proven to have (a fact that even you have alluded to), it just shows that you have been one of the first to have the wool pulled over your eyes, that’s all.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.