Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Economics and Investing
- This topic has 175 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 12 months ago by
p-dude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 12, 2007 at 8:35 AM #115162December 12, 2007 at 9:24 AM #115010
drunkle
Participantcfc doubled, citi tripled. cut those positions in half, see what happens the rest of the week…
i’m still holding on to $30 dec citi puts from earlier, i need those to get working…
builder stocks are acting stupid though. dec plays in meritage and dr horton look like they’ll end worthless.
December 12, 2007 at 9:24 AM #115139drunkle
Participantcfc doubled, citi tripled. cut those positions in half, see what happens the rest of the week…
i’m still holding on to $30 dec citi puts from earlier, i need those to get working…
builder stocks are acting stupid though. dec plays in meritage and dr horton look like they’ll end worthless.
December 12, 2007 at 9:24 AM #115172drunkle
Participantcfc doubled, citi tripled. cut those positions in half, see what happens the rest of the week…
i’m still holding on to $30 dec citi puts from earlier, i need those to get working…
builder stocks are acting stupid though. dec plays in meritage and dr horton look like they’ll end worthless.
December 12, 2007 at 9:24 AM #115176drunkle
Participantcfc doubled, citi tripled. cut those positions in half, see what happens the rest of the week…
i’m still holding on to $30 dec citi puts from earlier, i need those to get working…
builder stocks are acting stupid though. dec plays in meritage and dr horton look like they’ll end worthless.
December 12, 2007 at 9:24 AM #115214drunkle
Participantcfc doubled, citi tripled. cut those positions in half, see what happens the rest of the week…
i’m still holding on to $30 dec citi puts from earlier, i need those to get working…
builder stocks are acting stupid though. dec plays in meritage and dr horton look like they’ll end worthless.
December 12, 2007 at 2:34 PM #115210EconProf
ParticipantBobS
To Rather Opinionated:
The markets just closed and SRS is up for the day. Thanks for your comments–you are a great contrary indicator. Can I get your advice again some time?December 12, 2007 at 2:34 PM #115337EconProf
ParticipantBobS
To Rather Opinionated:
The markets just closed and SRS is up for the day. Thanks for your comments–you are a great contrary indicator. Can I get your advice again some time?December 12, 2007 at 2:34 PM #115371EconProf
ParticipantBobS
To Rather Opinionated:
The markets just closed and SRS is up for the day. Thanks for your comments–you are a great contrary indicator. Can I get your advice again some time?December 12, 2007 at 2:34 PM #115379EconProf
ParticipantBobS
To Rather Opinionated:
The markets just closed and SRS is up for the day. Thanks for your comments–you are a great contrary indicator. Can I get your advice again some time?December 12, 2007 at 2:34 PM #115412EconProf
ParticipantBobS
To Rather Opinionated:
The markets just closed and SRS is up for the day. Thanks for your comments–you are a great contrary indicator. Can I get your advice again some time?December 12, 2007 at 5:29 PM #115365cooperthedog
ParticipantHere are my thoughts, take them for what you will.
Determine what timeframe you are investing for. Are you looking to make short term trades or hold for months? The ideal risk/reward entry points into shorting financials and builders has passed, but trading can be profitable, though you will have to accept more risk, volatility, etc.
As someone mentioned above, preserving capital is very important. Use predetermined loss points and stick to them, and use trailing stops to (hopefully) let your profits run & lock in gains.
Large drawdowns can cripple your portfolio. Leverage and volatile investments magnify this affect. Large losses are also exponentially harder to recover from:
10% loss requires a subsequent 11% gain
20% -> 25%
30% -> 43%
40% -> 67%
50% -> 100%SRS, SKF, & SCC are all ultra bear funds, which means they are internally leveraged (using derivatives to attempt to perform 2x the inverse of the underlying). These can be excellent tools if used appropriately, but placing too large of a chunk of your portfolio into these is risky. Even though they are “diversified” in that they track an index, they are considerably more volatile than broad-based ETF’s that track large sections of the market (e.g. SPY). Be prepared for large gaps overnight.
As has been noted before, financials and builders may have more room to slide but aren’t ideal for non-traders at this point.
The next sector to potentially take a hit is the consumers, and I agree with the poster above that it is still relatively early on these. SCC trades very thinly, so I would avoid that for now.
If we assume that the housing mess coupled with the inability to extract equity will cause consumers to tighten up, which consumer stocks are the most vulnerable? I would stay away from the value side, such as the Walmart’s & Costco’s and would focus on the “faux-luxury” stocks like COH, TIF, NORD, GES, etc.
Best of luck.
December 12, 2007 at 5:29 PM #115494cooperthedog
ParticipantHere are my thoughts, take them for what you will.
Determine what timeframe you are investing for. Are you looking to make short term trades or hold for months? The ideal risk/reward entry points into shorting financials and builders has passed, but trading can be profitable, though you will have to accept more risk, volatility, etc.
As someone mentioned above, preserving capital is very important. Use predetermined loss points and stick to them, and use trailing stops to (hopefully) let your profits run & lock in gains.
Large drawdowns can cripple your portfolio. Leverage and volatile investments magnify this affect. Large losses are also exponentially harder to recover from:
10% loss requires a subsequent 11% gain
20% -> 25%
30% -> 43%
40% -> 67%
50% -> 100%SRS, SKF, & SCC are all ultra bear funds, which means they are internally leveraged (using derivatives to attempt to perform 2x the inverse of the underlying). These can be excellent tools if used appropriately, but placing too large of a chunk of your portfolio into these is risky. Even though they are “diversified” in that they track an index, they are considerably more volatile than broad-based ETF’s that track large sections of the market (e.g. SPY). Be prepared for large gaps overnight.
As has been noted before, financials and builders may have more room to slide but aren’t ideal for non-traders at this point.
The next sector to potentially take a hit is the consumers, and I agree with the poster above that it is still relatively early on these. SCC trades very thinly, so I would avoid that for now.
If we assume that the housing mess coupled with the inability to extract equity will cause consumers to tighten up, which consumer stocks are the most vulnerable? I would stay away from the value side, such as the Walmart’s & Costco’s and would focus on the “faux-luxury” stocks like COH, TIF, NORD, GES, etc.
Best of luck.
December 12, 2007 at 5:29 PM #115528cooperthedog
ParticipantHere are my thoughts, take them for what you will.
Determine what timeframe you are investing for. Are you looking to make short term trades or hold for months? The ideal risk/reward entry points into shorting financials and builders has passed, but trading can be profitable, though you will have to accept more risk, volatility, etc.
As someone mentioned above, preserving capital is very important. Use predetermined loss points and stick to them, and use trailing stops to (hopefully) let your profits run & lock in gains.
Large drawdowns can cripple your portfolio. Leverage and volatile investments magnify this affect. Large losses are also exponentially harder to recover from:
10% loss requires a subsequent 11% gain
20% -> 25%
30% -> 43%
40% -> 67%
50% -> 100%SRS, SKF, & SCC are all ultra bear funds, which means they are internally leveraged (using derivatives to attempt to perform 2x the inverse of the underlying). These can be excellent tools if used appropriately, but placing too large of a chunk of your portfolio into these is risky. Even though they are “diversified” in that they track an index, they are considerably more volatile than broad-based ETF’s that track large sections of the market (e.g. SPY). Be prepared for large gaps overnight.
As has been noted before, financials and builders may have more room to slide but aren’t ideal for non-traders at this point.
The next sector to potentially take a hit is the consumers, and I agree with the poster above that it is still relatively early on these. SCC trades very thinly, so I would avoid that for now.
If we assume that the housing mess coupled with the inability to extract equity will cause consumers to tighten up, which consumer stocks are the most vulnerable? I would stay away from the value side, such as the Walmart’s & Costco’s and would focus on the “faux-luxury” stocks like COH, TIF, NORD, GES, etc.
Best of luck.
December 12, 2007 at 5:29 PM #115531cooperthedog
ParticipantHere are my thoughts, take them for what you will.
Determine what timeframe you are investing for. Are you looking to make short term trades or hold for months? The ideal risk/reward entry points into shorting financials and builders has passed, but trading can be profitable, though you will have to accept more risk, volatility, etc.
As someone mentioned above, preserving capital is very important. Use predetermined loss points and stick to them, and use trailing stops to (hopefully) let your profits run & lock in gains.
Large drawdowns can cripple your portfolio. Leverage and volatile investments magnify this affect. Large losses are also exponentially harder to recover from:
10% loss requires a subsequent 11% gain
20% -> 25%
30% -> 43%
40% -> 67%
50% -> 100%SRS, SKF, & SCC are all ultra bear funds, which means they are internally leveraged (using derivatives to attempt to perform 2x the inverse of the underlying). These can be excellent tools if used appropriately, but placing too large of a chunk of your portfolio into these is risky. Even though they are “diversified” in that they track an index, they are considerably more volatile than broad-based ETF’s that track large sections of the market (e.g. SPY). Be prepared for large gaps overnight.
As has been noted before, financials and builders may have more room to slide but aren’t ideal for non-traders at this point.
The next sector to potentially take a hit is the consumers, and I agree with the poster above that it is still relatively early on these. SCC trades very thinly, so I would avoid that for now.
If we assume that the housing mess coupled with the inability to extract equity will cause consumers to tighten up, which consumer stocks are the most vulnerable? I would stay away from the value side, such as the Walmart’s & Costco’s and would focus on the “faux-luxury” stocks like COH, TIF, NORD, GES, etc.
Best of luck.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
