- This topic has 90 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by
sdcellar.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM #18086October 18, 2010 at 4:25 AM #619348
joec
ParticipantI’ve read the deductibles are incredibly high so many people skip it (like 100k or more). I’ve also read, knock on wood that San Diego isn’t on any of the major fault lines. No comfort during the 2 or 3 recent pretty strong earthquakes here though.
We didn’t buy it.
October 18, 2010 at 4:25 AM #620420joec
ParticipantI’ve read the deductibles are incredibly high so many people skip it (like 100k or more). I’ve also read, knock on wood that San Diego isn’t on any of the major fault lines. No comfort during the 2 or 3 recent pretty strong earthquakes here though.
We didn’t buy it.
October 18, 2010 at 4:25 AM #620104joec
ParticipantI’ve read the deductibles are incredibly high so many people skip it (like 100k or more). I’ve also read, knock on wood that San Diego isn’t on any of the major fault lines. No comfort during the 2 or 3 recent pretty strong earthquakes here though.
We didn’t buy it.
October 18, 2010 at 4:25 AM #619983joec
ParticipantI’ve read the deductibles are incredibly high so many people skip it (like 100k or more). I’ve also read, knock on wood that San Diego isn’t on any of the major fault lines. No comfort during the 2 or 3 recent pretty strong earthquakes here though.
We didn’t buy it.
October 18, 2010 at 4:25 AM #619431joec
ParticipantI’ve read the deductibles are incredibly high so many people skip it (like 100k or more). I’ve also read, knock on wood that San Diego isn’t on any of the major fault lines. No comfort during the 2 or 3 recent pretty strong earthquakes here though.
We didn’t buy it.
October 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM #619551an
ParticipantEarthquake insurance is so cheap, I consider it worthwhile for me. They’re going for around 150-300/yr. for your typical tract homes. That’s $4500-9000 over 30 years. Even if nothing happen, I’ve wasted <$10k over 30 years. But if something does happen... after all, that's the whole point of insurance, right?
October 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM #620538an
ParticipantEarthquake insurance is so cheap, I consider it worthwhile for me. They’re going for around 150-300/yr. for your typical tract homes. That’s $4500-9000 over 30 years. Even if nothing happen, I’ve wasted <$10k over 30 years. But if something does happen... after all, that's the whole point of insurance, right?
October 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM #620224an
ParticipantEarthquake insurance is so cheap, I consider it worthwhile for me. They’re going for around 150-300/yr. for your typical tract homes. That’s $4500-9000 over 30 years. Even if nothing happen, I’ve wasted <$10k over 30 years. But if something does happen... after all, that's the whole point of insurance, right?
October 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM #620103an
ParticipantEarthquake insurance is so cheap, I consider it worthwhile for me. They’re going for around 150-300/yr. for your typical tract homes. That’s $4500-9000 over 30 years. Even if nothing happen, I’ve wasted <$10k over 30 years. But if something does happen... after all, that's the whole point of insurance, right?
October 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM #619468an
ParticipantEarthquake insurance is so cheap, I consider it worthwhile for me. They’re going for around 150-300/yr. for your typical tract homes. That’s $4500-9000 over 30 years. Even if nothing happen, I’ve wasted <$10k over 30 years. But if something does happen... after all, that's the whole point of insurance, right?
October 18, 2010 at 9:07 AM #619561UCGal
ParticipantWe had it for the first few years of owning our current house – it was $127/year. We dropped it after my husband (architect) went through and did a “seismic retrofit”. He basically improved the diagonal bracing, stiffened certain walls so they’d act as sheer walls, and added additional bolts and strapping from the sill to the foundation. He said we’ll withstand a decent earthquake now… and if it’s bigger than what the house will take, we have different problems.
Depending on where you are in San Diego – you *could* have a major fault near you. We’re close to the rose canyon fault… so it was a concern for us.
The work my husband did is overkill – but the standards are so much more rigorous now, compared to when the house was built in 63 or 64.
If your house was built in the past decade or so – you probably don’t need any retrofit.
October 18, 2010 at 9:07 AM #620548UCGal
ParticipantWe had it for the first few years of owning our current house – it was $127/year. We dropped it after my husband (architect) went through and did a “seismic retrofit”. He basically improved the diagonal bracing, stiffened certain walls so they’d act as sheer walls, and added additional bolts and strapping from the sill to the foundation. He said we’ll withstand a decent earthquake now… and if it’s bigger than what the house will take, we have different problems.
Depending on where you are in San Diego – you *could* have a major fault near you. We’re close to the rose canyon fault… so it was a concern for us.
The work my husband did is overkill – but the standards are so much more rigorous now, compared to when the house was built in 63 or 64.
If your house was built in the past decade or so – you probably don’t need any retrofit.
October 18, 2010 at 9:07 AM #620234UCGal
ParticipantWe had it for the first few years of owning our current house – it was $127/year. We dropped it after my husband (architect) went through and did a “seismic retrofit”. He basically improved the diagonal bracing, stiffened certain walls so they’d act as sheer walls, and added additional bolts and strapping from the sill to the foundation. He said we’ll withstand a decent earthquake now… and if it’s bigger than what the house will take, we have different problems.
Depending on where you are in San Diego – you *could* have a major fault near you. We’re close to the rose canyon fault… so it was a concern for us.
The work my husband did is overkill – but the standards are so much more rigorous now, compared to when the house was built in 63 or 64.
If your house was built in the past decade or so – you probably don’t need any retrofit.
October 18, 2010 at 9:07 AM #620113UCGal
ParticipantWe had it for the first few years of owning our current house – it was $127/year. We dropped it after my husband (architect) went through and did a “seismic retrofit”. He basically improved the diagonal bracing, stiffened certain walls so they’d act as sheer walls, and added additional bolts and strapping from the sill to the foundation. He said we’ll withstand a decent earthquake now… and if it’s bigger than what the house will take, we have different problems.
Depending on where you are in San Diego – you *could* have a major fault near you. We’re close to the rose canyon fault… so it was a concern for us.
The work my husband did is overkill – but the standards are so much more rigorous now, compared to when the house was built in 63 or 64.
If your house was built in the past decade or so – you probably don’t need any retrofit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.